squint
Well-Known Member
I do no such thing and repeated accusations will not change that, You accuse me falsely without any knowledge of what I truly believe. I identify myself as a Calvinist, and you think that therefore, I MUST believe whatever false impression you have of Calvinism. And you claim you're not judging me? Bullwinky!
Then tell me if your "Calvinist Position" at least makes the "possibility" that God will save all mankind. That should settle the issue eh?
You have babbled on about nonsensical universalist views of which several have been conclusively shown to be misinterpretation and ignorance of context.
Specific criteria is the mother of legitimate critique.
There is no need to waste my time with a know-it-all.
Calling someone names would appear to be good exegesis? Why bother?
Ah, here we go.....squint has "special knowledge"...."knowledge not generally known"....the very definition of Gnosticism. Thank you for clearing that up.
I have claimed no "special knowledge" except from your lips to mine, which of course speaks for only your lips from your lips.
Will not the Lord of all the Earth do right? They are His problem, not mine. And, they are really no problem for Him, either. He has already said what He will do.
Who is "they?"
My measure is what God's Word specifically says about the fate of all who do not obey the Gospel, or glorify God as God, or believe on His Name. And it was people He was talking about.
Perhaps you can make a case that "some other person" never loved, did righteousness or good, but if they did, I have a very fair "scriptural measure" that says they know God and are born of same, and I really doubt that there is anyone who has not loved, done righteousness, or good.
Except Calvinists....
Calvinism is a compilation of ideas, not "mankind." I don't mix doctrines with those who hold same.
Metaphysical mumbo-jumbo. Was that a "crystal revelation"?
Read and respond with specifics if you want to take issue. I claim the ability to read and comprehend plain speaking from scripture.
And yet, you've offended every Calvinist here with your falsehoods and false accusations....go figure.
That is only what "you" think you hear. I can certainly take issue with a position quite apart from the person. I happen to love people even if they are democrat and I am republican. Get it?
And we have shown you that Paul did not say that all mankind are God's offspring,
I really didn't SEE where that statement from Paul was eliminated from the scriptures yet, so you have shown ZERO as it pertains to the elimination of Paul's statements other than the desire to make them go away.
and that Jesus specifically said that those who do not believe are of their father the devil. Jesus was not talking to demons, He was talking to human beings, just like you and me.
I happen to believe that Jesus was actually speaking to those whom he said, children of the devil, who you may aptly note were often chided, commanded, and even cast out of MANKIND. If you do not see that what do you really expect me to say? I can read. He also called those same ones in so obviously there is more going on here than what you are able to see or even less to accept. What is that to me?
In other words, I must 'buy in" to the thinking before I dare find fault? Sorry, I don't pollute my mind with gnostic myths.
Gnostic is again, only your term attempting to paste itself to my lips. When I say a clear statement such as Paul's statement that "all mankind are Gods offspring" it does not make me "gnostic" and it does not take "special revelation" to read and comprehend that statement, nor is it "revelation" to accept that statement, and to believe what those words say, regardless of what you may think about it.
You have no trouble criticizing Calvinism, even though you haven't "bought into" it. Your requirement is bogus, because you don't practice it yourself.
I gave specific scriptural critique and exception to Calvin's positions. That specific criteria can be addressed specifically if you like, or you can simply rail at yourself. Makes no diff to me. Legitimate critique I can respond to. The other I can't or won't cause it's just you against yourself.
And yet you have done nothing but condemn Calvinists since you showed up with your "special knowledge". So I daresay, I do have a point.
Only in your mind.
Men love darkness rather than the light. That is not something within them that is not them, that is the way they are born. MEN love Darkness rather than light.
Depends on "which men" we are talking about. Even "Lucifer" was called "a man" in text, and of course I don't consider that Lucifer was a man, but the devil. Sometimes these terms get tossed around a little loosely. Angels can also be termed "men." The terms "angel, or men" are multifunctional terms that apply several ways. Scripture 101
As for your statement, "The "practice" of Irresistible Grace is upon you", I have no idea what you mean. Is that like "the eyes of the Ranger are upon you"?
Calvinist's have a term called Irresistible Grace, but of course they don't really apply it that way except in limited fashions.
It is more mumbo-jumbo, as far as I'm concerned.
Universalism was and still is heresy, according to the Early Church and numerous Councils and Synods. Historically, you haven't got a leg to stand on.
Like I said before, even the Catholics accept the possibility of after death salvation, and that cannot be termed therefore "heretical" or "unorthodox" as it doesn't get more "orthodox" than they.
enjoy!
squint
Upvote
0