Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So, God abandons you after a couple weeks of pornography and you fall from grace. So, he takes back the gift that his word says is irrevocable and I'm unsealed (permanent marking) and the holy spirit that was given to me leaves. Now, what exact work do I have to do to get back into his graces? Just stop the action altogether or say another special prayer? In your perfectionist doctrine there is no room for justification or sanctification. I agree that we all repent from sins, in the sense that we recognize them as what they are, but I don't believe Christ takes back what he gives and I don't believe that any true Christian does live in a constant state of sin for instance. However , as I said before, I don't believe once you are saved you instantly are cured from any addiction you ever had or that you don't have trouble with anger or controlling your mouth. You may come from a privileged upbringing and enjoyed the shading of a nice rock and a silver spoon (who knows?), but some of us have lived life and been to some pretty bad places. And I think it's pretty crappy that you want to demonize and send to hell everyone who's life is still being worked on, because they don't fit your doctrines of salvation and not Christ's. We can turn scripture or isolate specific passages all day, but his gift is irrevocable and we are sealed and hath salvation (present tense) (That means now btw). I never avoided your question about having a favorite sin, because I don't have one. Each of my sins disgusts me, sometimes to the point of depression and exacerbates other mental issues I already have. Like I said I have struggled with alcoholism in the past and smoking and none of those issues were cut and dry. They took work and that's real obiendience and freedom and strength. I know we wont see eye to eye on anything, but I wanted to reply to your last post, because I was busy all day and didn't have the chance. I'm also not afraid to admit that I've struggled with pornography addiction since I was about 9 that stemmed from multiple cases of sexual abuse. I'm doing extremely well now (though probably absolutely hell bound for even writing that sentence.). I've also had a long history of self-harm and 2 incidents of nearly completed, but interrupted suicides. (Make fun of those too please)
You also seem to flip flop on what lands you out of grace and what doesn't. As I said in my earlier post, your version of salvation makes the bibles seem insane, because it's incomplete. I don't know if you have kids, but when I bought mine one of those little cars that you can get into and use your feet to drive it came with a manual. This manual was clear and precise about exactly what I had to do to put it together (once i found the English directions). Now, I know you can quote a scripture here and a few over there, but you never use all the scripture. You always leave out the OSAS passages and don't want to look at them and can't justify why they exist, because in my estimation they far out weigh what I've found for arguments against OSAS (I wasn't always OSAS btw and no that doesn't mean that I was anti-osas until i found a really cool sin. Can't oversimplify things here). So, what I'm saying is that your Bible is going to save no one and can't fully explain it's most important doctrine clearly enough (like my technical manual). I have trouble reconciling that. I once got into a discussion with a perfectionist like yourself on youtube and he suffered from severe anger issues, guess he's hell bound lol. Anyway, that's really all I have to say.
PS if you want to edit my grammatical errors feel free, I'm sure there are plenty![]()
I first want to say thank you for your service to the Lord and your faithful work in ministry. As far scripture that supports my position. I have provided several in this thread. In order to keep this post short i will only provide a couple. It is a copy/paste and i will provide a link. Only to show you that there is a sound argument against osas. That is why Augustine's position on single predestination was rejected by the Council of Nicea and it is why the RC and EO reject it.I think your incorrect. But no matter how much proof I give, no matter how much scripture I gave, You have given none. Please support you position with Scripture, then we can dialogue. Our opinions are just that.
never meet any one who says that .. after all, when Paul speaks against salvation by works he is very specifically referring to blood sacrifices and circumcision .. the works of " the law ' .. i have never met any one who teaches such works for salvation
if your saved , of you are set free ... because one who is saved from bondage is set free from bondage .. then why don't you live as one set free and stop living as one who is still in bondage ?
If we continue in sin, after we have asked Jesus to be our personal Savior, are we really in a saved relationship, are we converted? "For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins." Hebrews 10:26.
Don't you see your error here?
You set it up by defining our action as, "after we have asked Jesus to be our personal Savior". The action being done here is repenting.
Then you quote a verse with a completely different action, "after that we have received the knowledge of the truth", and then equate them together as if they were the same thing. They are not.
Mere knowledge of the truth cannot save. Even the Devil and his minions know the truth.
And the scriptueyou base that on is....? Where does scripture define Doing rightousness as "working to earn salvation ?" john states that those who do not practice rightousness(practice is an action)are not of god..he then states those that continue to practice sin (practice is an action) are of the devil.- yup thats written.Sure you have. It usually comes across using such language as saying salvation is lost if we don't "follow him", or if we "fall away", or if we "fall into sin", and all the different variants thereof.
Every version of where we do something to be unsaved by not being "christian enough" is salvation by works. And as it happens, a false gospel.
Your beliefs and even your replies have become more underwhelming with continuing scrutiny. I guess that's really all we have to say to each other on the issue. Disappointing.
Are you implying these scriptures do not exist ?Not to mention that the same verse that he is quoting says the if it were even possible to fall away, a person who has done so would not be able to be saved again. Every works/perfectionist leaves that part out. All a part of there pick and choose fill in the blank philosophy.
If you are still practicing the sin..youhave not yet repented of itDon't you see your error here?
You set it up by defining our action as, "after we have asked Jesus to be our personal Savior". The action being done here is repenting.
Then you quote a verse with a completely different action, "after that we have received the knowledge of the truth", and then equate them together as if they were the same thing. They are not.
Mere knowledge of the truth cannot save. Even the Devil and his minions know the truth.
Sadly its not scripture..it is a partial sentance and presenting it itas a partial sentance makes it a pat truth and we know a part truth can promote a part lie.Just felt inspired to add this to the discussion since it doesn't appear to have been mentioned as yet.
Romans 8:1
Reading all of the author of Romans in that chapter is good in order to get the context. However, I believe verse 1 helps in this moment to reassure those who may be confused by the discussion thus far and due to the differing perspectives, including as has been mentioned numerous times, the wrong or false teachings or understandings related to eternal salvation.
![]()
Well, that's why I stated to read Romans 8 in context so that you wouldn't have to attempt to call the Roman writer a liar because you missed that part of my post in order to criticize without cause.Sadly its not scripture..it is a partial sentance and presenting it itas a partial sentance makes it a pat truth and we know a part truth can promote a part lie.
I hope you find a church you can trust to educate you as to what it means to be in Christ.Sadly its not scripture..it is a partial sentance and presenting it itas a partial sentance makes it a pat truth and we know a part truth can promote a part lie.
Lets give it more referencable scope...
--
Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. - Romans 8:1-4
Aah now we see a conditional state of living by faith that acompanies the text.and so we see the textdoes not apply to all who claim faith.but those who live on obedience to the holy spirit.it does not apply to those who live according to the flesh...
Just adding the balance.
Lol so many wrongful assumptions in this post it would take another thread to adress them all.
I hope you find a church you can trust to educate you as to what it means to be in Christ.
Christians are indwelt with the holy spirit. The text is talking about the difference between those who are nominal christians and those who are indwelt and are in Christ .
I hope you can find the difference with strong study of the Bible. As it is, you have no understanding of the NT and no place in hoping to lead people when you don't know the passages and how they apply yourself.