- Jul 17, 2005
- 21,378
- 1,650
- 58
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
That post needs to be reported.
The whole thread is full of the same. I'm not reporting it though. I just think it is ironic.
Lisa
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That post needs to be reported.
I work in human resources and one of the things I have to teach is harassment. Intent is not even the issue, the legal question is how is it received. What one person finds offensive may not offend someone else.
Yes we should be able to voice our opinions, but it might solve a lot of problems if we stop and ask ourselves: How would an outsider feel about this post? Does this comment glorify God?
To label someone as "liberal" or "conservative" or even "fundie" is to immediately introduce a whole host of assumptions about that person's beliefs, conveniently located under the umbrella of that "label". Conservatives Christians are not bad Christians because they are conservative, nor are Liberal Christians evil because they are liberal.
I saw this quote somewhere I liked it. Can't remember who said it but I know it was a Lutheran scholastic.There should be unity in essentials, liberty in non-essentials, charity in all things. So denominations dont necessarily suggest disunity. Genuine Christians of different denominations can work together, pray together, and evangelize together.
So we Christians who are genuinely united by Gods Spirit should seek to make visible the invisible unity we all share even though we will disagree on some issues.
I rather be a Christian that is humbled and Scripture-seeking rather than arrogant and smug. I love it that the Apostle Paul, who was willing to confront Peter to his face when the gospel was at stake while at the same time Paul said live at peace with everyone if at all possible.
so is it generally going to be regarded i this forum that to say 'there are liberals saved and those claiming christianity, and we are supposed to seperate from those expousing liberal doctrine because it waters down scripture' something like this is now considered a flame?

I think one big issue we have about "flames" and reports is with individual people. Some people see "flames" where others do not. Some people ARE predisposed to being defensive and taking things personally where another may not. This is especially true of those with a "victim mentality" where everything that may resound as truth within themselves sets off all sorts of triggers within an individual and then the whole screen is aflame where another not pre-disposed to this thought patterns sees the same page as clear, cool water...
I think this is something that all moderators should be keeping in mind as well... I personally have seen quite a few moderators operate from this mentality in reports (the reports that come to mind have honestly nothing to do with CC).
This is more of a human nature issue where some people are easily offended vs. others... And one, that unfortunately moderators need to take into account as well. Also, one should never let someone operating from a "victim mentality" run roughshod over others who are clearly expressing their opinions and are not slighting others.

I agree - lots to absorb in your post.Thank you, once again, you offer very calm, clear insights. Whilst reading this thread very carefully, some great ideas came to me. When I try to express them, they will likely take off like a herd of flamingos.....
Recently, I received a pm from other members seeking to solve the problems of flames and reports by not responding and not reporting those we feel are insincere.
Now I think we should take advantage of the "stats" Father Rick presented about the reports. What if we did agree with each other never to post any more reports?
Wouldn't that bring to light who are using the rules against others for the wrong reasons? And would that also let the mods know that us Inner Conservatives are not to blame for the spite and contention?
Consider how we got into the habit of making strong statements and standing us for our rights to believe and express our opinions and even opposition?
Apologetics and debate is the core infection of CF. We are almost trained to express ourselves in battle mode. Those who are much better at playing the game and more coldly clever at manipulation though this mode of communication are winning the battle and the war.
They have almost made us the victims and casualties of our own Christianity.
I am saying this because I have fought and defended my faith for too long not to see how futile it is. We say that God is more powerful than we are and than is our opponents.
Surely God also gave us the intelligence to recognize our downfall was due to our willingness to play their games and subject ourselves to their rules.
Are we defending our faith here, or is this really just a turf war? If so, we lost it already. Now we are trying to come up with other ways of doing the same thing.
How about we stop contending with staff and troublemakers and start coping with the realities in the Light of our Faith?
Can we stop expecting everything from others to help us? Can we stop thinking if we can just manage ways around the trouble, we can overcome it all?
Let's cease trying so hard to make others see our way and start turning to one another to enjoy posting again.
LeeD himself spoke very clearly about part of what he is trying to do here:
If you think you are being flamed, choose *not* to be offended, but instead take a break, and communicate,
rather than escalating or accusing others.
It looks to me like what he is telling us is that we need to relate honestly with each other and stop playing the angry victim card to make trouble or to take revenge.
That means spite reports are out. Period.
That means not relying on staff to make everyone be fair with each other. That does not work, big time.
I have also just read the new system of warnings, infractions, and bans. Take heed of this.
LeeD is serious and he is not Erwin.
I suspected that the recent chaos in CCC were the last chance forays against conservative Christians. Those who oppose us knew well before us that the new owner will not put up with all the nonsense going on for years and escalating in the total ruins we have today.
![]()
Latreia, you just confirmed something to me in this post... I had just said this about our motives & activity here in CC in the new thread that I PRAY doesn't turn into WW5 (a few thoughts, by Mnphysicist)Thanks Nadiine. LeeD and his leadership of Christian Forums is where we need to direct our full attention.
Flaming Christians is going to take on a very special meaning under his plans.
Neither will he allow Christians to be flammed, NOR is he going to put up with Christians who flame others. To me that sounds like THE solution for those who are insincere, in every way.
What he is implementing here is quite clearly members' self-control, and that is all of us.
From his Under New Management OP:
Use the brain God gave you. Think before you post.
Think about how your post may affect someone else.
This is not a suggestion, it is under the Temporary Rules List there. But take heed of the fact it will be very much in the permanent rules.
He has cut cleanly to the very cancer and he is dealing with it.
I plan to cooperate with all my strength.
What others dislike about this new vision and new rules, reassures me that it is going to work. I just want to see it.
![]()
BTW, my site supporter status is now paid up through 30th September 2010.
![]()