My recollection is this has all been debunked. But just things I see that are flawed -- why are there no links to this "data" from the NY Times? Is there a reason I should trust them -- particularly when the charts they show (which do not appear to be from the NY Times) votes to two decimal places? For example, they claim the negative votes taken from Biden were 330,153.34; how is 1/3 of a vote being taken away -- particular since the vote total before it was 1,771,657.95 -- how were there 19/20ths of a vote?
Next, they show roughly 640,000 votes taken away from Biden and only about 120,000 votes taken away from Trump -- wouldn't the charge be that Trump/Republicans cheated since Biden was the one that lost so many votes?
But the biggest thing, why are they using NY Times data -- the NY Times merely reported the data they received and, as can often happen, mistakes may have been made when they received the data and, if they made mistakes, it didn't effect the official vote count. If this had really happened, they'd be showing the official vote count by the State of Virginia. The fact they use the NY Times data would imply that the NY Times made a mistake (if this "data" is honest and accurate) and corrected it when they realized their count did not agree with the official Virginia count.
The fact is, from everything I've seen, there were no errors in the "official" count in any state -- every time it has been pointed out they've pointed out corrections by news organizations, where that company made mistakes, I've not seen any "corrections" like that in the official count of any state.
Next, counts did not stop in the swing states -- they are flat out wrong (or lying) about that. Some precincts shut down. The "famous" alleged "shut down" that led to these claims was in Fulton County, GA; where people were told that they were going to shut down for the night, workers thought they were shutting down, but then they were told they needed to keep counting the vote.
As for Trump having an early lead -- this was predicted well before the election (
this article is from Oct. 9, 2020, almost a month before the election) -- due to how the counts were required to occur by law. As a general rule, most of Pres. Trumps votes were made by people voting in person and most of the votes for Joe Biden were going to be "mail in" votes. In most states -- including the swing states -- the law says that mail in votes cannot be counted until after the polls close. As such, the in person votes, the strong Trump vote, were counted first (the machines basically counted them as they were cast during the day) and then they started processing the mail in votes later in the evening -- so Trump had an early lead which gradually went away, particularly as the votes from large urban areas (which tend to vote Democratic) were counted.