- Aug 21, 2003
- 28,580
- 6,065
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I do have a big problem with your reply. Had you actually read my post you would know that I said very clearly that there were different Jewish views on the fate of the wicked. That does not disprove anything I said.I'm not sure why you say this when about everybody knows that "Gehenna is considered a purgatory-like place where the wicked go to suffer until they have atoned for their sins. It is stated in most Jewish sources that the maximum amount of time a sinner can spend in Gehenna is one year."
Gehenna - Wikipedia
In the 1st century, relatives of a deceased person usually picked up his remaining bones after 11 months and put them in an "ossuary." They did this so as not to imply that their relative was a terrible sinner deserving of the maximum time in Gehenna.
Caiaphas ossuary - Wikipedia
Is this another logical trick ? In 700 BC, the Jews spoke Hebrew, right. Did the Jews know about "Hell" from the Old Norse mythology in 700 BC? "The modern English word hell is derived from Old English hel, helle (first attested around 725 AD to refer to a nether world of the dead) reaching into the Anglo-Saxon pagan period.[1] The word has cognates in all branches of the Germanic languages, including Old Norse hel (which refers to both a location and goddess-like being in Norse mythology), Old Frisian helle, Old Saxon hellia, Old High German hella, and Gothic halja. All forms ultimately derive from the reconstructed Proto-Germanic feminine noun *xaljō or *haljō ('concealed place, the underworld')."
Hell - Wikipedia
Most Jews did not believe Gehenna was eternal. But they did believe some extremely evil people will have eternal punishment (not in Gehenna). I don't believe in universal salvation.
I accept this. I don't believe in annihilation.
If I missed any important points, plz let me know.
I quoted from three Jewish sources, records of Jewish history prepared by Jewish scholars; the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud. The Jewish Encyclopedia was compiled/reviewed by 50+ Jewish scholars.
And you claim Wiki, which is entered by anonymous people is more authoritative than these 3 sources.
Wikipedia has [edit] links on every page. Anyone can change, add, post anything they want to without review. I have done it a few times to prove that it can be done.
That a word in another languages many, many years ago sounds or looks like "hell" is not evidence that "hell" was derived from them. Etymology is not a reliable way of determining the meaning of a word. Example, when we say "truck" in English we think of a big boxy vehicle for hauling large, heavy loads. The original meaning of "truck" was vegetables.
Upvote
0