Noah's Ark

[AV1611VET]

24th century BC - Wikipedia

Nope, no flood.

Genesis 7

Nope, no Wikipedia.

 

[VirOptimus]

Genesis 7

Nope, no Wikipedia.

One is sourced and built on observation and diligant work.

The other is a myth.

 

[AV1611VET]

One is sourced and built on observation and diligant work.

If you're talking about Wikipedia, Wikipedia wasn't there in 2348 BC.

And if it had been, it would have been washed away.

So observation can take a hike.

 

[Goonie]

Completed about 2560bc. Evidence of flood zero.

 

[AV1611VET]

Evidence of flood zero.

Evidence of flood two.

 

[VirOptimus]

If you're talking about Wikipedia, Wikipedia wasn't there in 2348 BC.

And if it had been, it would have been washed away.

So observation can take a hike.

No, that is not how it works.

Your claim is unsubstantiated and disproven.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It wouldn't in it's state of being "upheld".

I believe as an article of faith that the story is true. I'm not trying to prove that the flood happened, I'm speculating about how it might have happened.

Ow, okay.

So basically, you believe simply because you want to believe. You have no actual proper reason to believe?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Stealing, lying, murder, adultery, for example.

So, in what secular society are these things allowed?

So why all the fuss over those things?

Because you are claiming them facts.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

God has led me to believe what I believe, otherwise I wouldn't believe it.

Owkay.

This is indistinguishable from a hindu saying the same thing, though.
Unfalsifiable statements that are actually quite indistinguishable from mere imagination.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, that is not how it works.

Your claim is unsubstantiated and disproven.

Guess I'll have to believe it by faith then, won't I?

 

[AV1611VET]

Ow, okay.

So basically, you believe simply because you want to believe. You have no actual proper reason to believe?

Is faith proper?

 

[VirOptimus]

Guess I'll have to believe it by faith then, won't I?

You can belive whatevere you want of course. A bit silly when physical reality says otherwise, but knock yourself out.

 

[AV1611VET]

A bit silly when physical reality says otherwise, but knock yourself out.

Physical reality talks funny: often saying contradictory things.

How does physical reality say we got our moon?

And of all the ways, which one does physical reality say is the best one?

 

[Subduction Zone]

2348 BC

Refuted by several civilizations that continued on, both before and after this date as if nothing happened.


Dern fureners.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Guess I'll have to believe it by faith then, won't I?

That is what people that are wrong tend to do.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is faith proper?

Faith is not a road to truth. It will lead you to Islam, Christianity, or Hinduism, based mainly upon where you were born.

So, no.

 

[AV1611VET]

Refuted by several civilizations that continued on, both before and after this date as if nothing happened.

Like the Sumerian empire, built by a backslider? an empire that wrote its own version of the Flood in order to mock it? an empire so evil the Antichrist will resurrect it in the Tribulation?

Or the Egyptian empire? an empire that, in Bible typology, is a type of the world? an empire that enslaved the Hebrews and attempted genocide by prolicide? the one God calls the "iron furnace"? the one that was placed off-limits to Old Testament saints?

 

[AV1611VET]

That is what people that are wrong tend to do.

Ya ... faith in a product of science got us a generation of Thalidomites, didn't it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Faith is not a road to truth. It will lead you to Islam, Christianity, or Hinduism, based mainly upon where you were born.

And where does faith lead you?

 

[Jimmy D]

Evidence of flood two.

I've always wondered why you think the white cliffs of Dover were formed by a flood? I'm sure you've explained it before but I must have missed it.