Noah way?

[Loudmouth]

A woman dresses for a party in a hideous gown and asks both her friend and husband how it looks. The friend says it looks fine. The husband says, "It's hideous. change it. People will laugh at you if you wear that."
Who shows greater love?

God strikes her down for wearing a gown made of mixed fibers. Who shows greater love?

 

[Loudmouth]

On paper.

In fossils.

Also, in DNA.

 

[Aman777]

Were there no rainbows before the Noachian flood?

Dear selfinflikted, No. This is demonstrated by the Fact that Noah remained in the Ark long after he knew the land was dry. The difference between our Earth and Adam's is that it didn't rain on Adam's Earth UNTIL the Flood, which "clean dissolved" it. Isa 24:19 Noah did not come out of the Ark until God assured him that never again would He destroy the earth in a Flood. Gen 9:11 Can you imagine the fear which came upon Noah when the first rain fell after his whole world was destroyed in the rain?

In Love,
Aman

 

[Loudmouth]

Dear Loudmouth, False, since your "evidence" is the DNA and ERVs of the common ancestor of Apes. God refutes your "so called" evidence by showing us how Human blood was contaminated with animal blood.

Sorry, but you were asked to present scientific evidence. Where is it?

Pretending to be God is not evidence.

In the process Humans lost some 90% of our lifespans, when Noah's grandsons, had NO other Humans to marry. They married and produced chidlren who inherited Adam's intelligence AND the blood of filthy animals.

So you were lying when you said that you had scientific evidence. You were also lying when you said that scientists did not have evidence.

Go figure.

 

[Queller]

Like it matters ... right?

Genesis 6:12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.

Of course it matters:

Genesis 6:12 God saw how corrupt the earth had become, for all the people on earth had corrupted their ways.

 

[selfinflikted]

Dear selfinflikted, No. This is demonstrated by the Fact that Noah remained in the Ark long after he knew the land was dry. The difference between our Earth and Adam's is that it didn't rain on Adam's Earth UNTIL the Flood, which "clean dissolved" it. Isa 24:19 Noah did not come out of the Ark until God assured him that never again would He destroy the earth in a Flood. Gen 9:11 Can you imagine the fear which came upon Noah when the first rain fell after his whole world was destroyed in the rain?

In Love,
Aman

No rain? How did life sustain itself without a hydrologic cycle?

 

[Queller]

Genesis 6:12

Genesis 6:12

God saw how corrupt the earth had become, for all the people on earth had corrupted their ways.

 

[AV1611VET]

Sure AV, that's all it is, drawings, charts whatever. Keep telling yourself that.

Then take my Daisy Chain Challenge.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Then take my Daisy Chain Challenge.

Which is?

 

[Aman777]

Originally Posted by Aman777

Dear Loudmouth, False, since your "evidence" is the DNA and ERVs of the common ancestor of Apes. God refutes your "so called" evidence by showing us how Human blood was contaminated with animal blood.
​

Sorry, but you were asked to present scientific evidence. Where is it?

Dear Loudmouth, It's non-existent since godless scientists reject God's Truth. I also notice that you did NOT refute my evidence which is the ONLY and BEST evidence available.

Pretending to be God is not evidence.

Agreed. WHY do you pretend to know more than God? He told us the Truth but you seem to think that you know more than what He told us in Genesis 6:1-4. How long have you believed such foolishness?

In the process Humans lost some 90% of our lifespans, when Noah's grandsons, had NO other Humans to marry. They married and produced chidlren who inherited Adam's intelligence AND the blood of filthy animals.
​

So you were lying when you said that you had scientific evidence. You were also lying when you said that scientists did not have evidence.

Go figure.

I gave you the evidence and you failed to refute me. Now, you ask me to prove something which godless men reject. The proof is within EVERY human on Earth today since all of us have the DNA and ERVs of the common ancestor of Apes AND the Human intelligence of Adam.

Can you tell us HOW we inherited the Human intelligence which ONLY Adam and God had? Genesis 3:22 Or must you claim that today's scientists are totally ignorant of the only evidence available? Such deceptive questioning tells us a lot more about you than the willing ignorance of today's incomplete, untrue, false ToE.

BTW, I've noticed that your view is a one trick pony view since you always ask for evidence, and then ignore it. Have you read about the Scoffers of the last days? ll Peter 3:3-7 I think it is speaking of people who think like YOU. What is your opinion?

In Love,
Aman

 

[Queller]

Sorry. I get a little angry sometimes.

For the sake of your soul, listen to me. There is going to be a judgment and vengeance. The Lord is going to win. If you do not believe in the Son of God, you have no chance. It's believe or be destroyed. There is no third option.

What if we believe in Jesus but don't take the entire Bible literally. Then what?

 

[Aman777]

No rain? How did life sustain itself without a hydrologic cycle?

Dear selfinflikted, It's another reason WHY Adam's Earth was totally different than the present Earth.

Gen 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

See? God's Truth is the Truth in EVERY way. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[AV1611VET]

Which is?

QV:

Can we take every single piece of physical biological evidence for evolution that is currently on display everywhere, and line them up side-by-side in a way that can account for every single year in history since abiogenesis?

If so, if I just arbitrarily asked what piece of physical biological evidence represents 494,012 B.C., it could be produced?

Or are there more years in existence since abiogenesis, than there are pieces of physical biological evidence representing each individual year?

In other words: missing links that make daisy-chaining impossible?

 

[selfinflikted]

Dear selfinflikted, It's another reason WHY Adam's Earth was totally different than the present Earth.

Gen 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

See? God's Truth is the Truth in EVERY way. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

I'm sure you realize the physical evidence doesn't support your assertion that there was no precipitation before the flood. Right?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Then take my Daisy Chain Challenge.

You mean the one that you admitted defeat in in only the fourth post?

You do know that when you say "can take a hike" we all see that as an admission of defeat on your part. It shows that you have no answer for a reasoned argument.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Well AV, if we don't count abiogenesis itself, I can get quite a bit of information. So much that it would be unreasonable to post it all. How about you pick a specific creature at random that exists today and I construct the evolutionary timeline that we know of for it for you instead? I would be writing the content of multiple books if I wrote down all the information we had on the evolution of everything.

 

[AV1611VET]

Well AV, if we don't count abiogenesis itself, I can get quite a bit of information.

And if you laid them side-by-side, you would have so many gaps between them, one would die of thirst trying to fly from one to another in a saber jet.

So much that it would be unreasonable to post it all.

That's right.

It would probably have to stretch to Pluto and back several thousand times.

How about you pick a specific creature at random that exists today and I construct the evolutionary timeline that we know of for it for you instead?

No, mam.

That's not the point of my challenge.

If I told you I had evidence of a 45-character alphabet from Neptune, but could only produce three characters, but demanded you "connect the dots" on paper ... I'm sure you wouldn't believe me.

I would be writing the content of multiple books if I wrote down all the information we had on the evolution of everything.

Imagine what you would have to make up to fill in the gaps!?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Come on AV, I am trying my best, to give you every bit of information is just too much for one person to do, and too much to expect you to read it all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And if you laid them side-by-side, you would have so many gaps between them, one would die of thirst trying to fly from one to another in a saber jet.

Why do you make this claim? How much space does a "gap" take?

Failed analogy.

That's right.

It would probably have to stretch to Pluto and back several thousand times.

Again, how much space does a "gap" take?

Yet another failed analogy.

No, mam.

That's not the point of my challenge.

Your challenges never have a point. That is the point of your challenges.

If I told you I had evidence of a 45-character alphabet from Neptune, but could only produce three characters, but demanded you "connect the dots" on paper ... I'm sure you wouldn't believe me.

Imagine what you would have to make up to fill in the gaps!?

No one has claimed how many steps there were, and how do steps correspond to an alphabet? At best a step might be a word written in an alphabet, not the alphabet itself.

So a doubly failed analogy.

AV, your analogies need some practice. When they fail so badly they do not make you look good.

The fact is that every fossil found to date fits the evolutionary paradigm. This is a paradigm that is falsifiable by fossils. In other words we have found millions of fossils and none of them counter evolution.

Meanwhile creationists have no viable explanation for the fossils. Not how they were made. Not how we find them. Their ideas are not supported by the real world.

 

[poikilotherm]

AV, you of all people shouldn't be criticizing things "on paper."

Can I vote for this one?