1. The fossil evidence doesn't show evolution occurring. Evolutionists claim they can fit the data into some models, but the same data can fit into other non-evolutionary models as well.
There is nothing about the fossil record to prove evolution.
2. Genetics: While the study of genetics is relatively young such that certain ideas should be taken with a grain of salt until they withstand the test of time, one thing we do know. Mutations are rare, and often not beneficial. It appears from genetics that evolution is unlikely.
3. Micro-evolution: This is what evolutionists used to rely on as proof, things like Darwin's finches, but as creationist models predict micro-evolution as well, there is no conclusive evidence for common descent here.
4. similarites of all life forms: This is just as much evidence of a Common Designer as it is for common descent.
5. Abiogenesis: Unlikely if not impossible for this to occur from natural processes. If, as evolutionists insist, natural processes can explain the origin of all species, why can it not explain adequately the origin of the first species under its scenario. This is the Achilles Heel of evolutionary theory, and basically destroys it though the proponents will insist on drawing a line in the process and excluding the development of the first cell from evolution as a semantic means of clinging to a dying myth.
6. Living systems: It is now theorized that whole species did not evolve for the most part, but rather isolated groups. If that is the case, why did so many of the original species go extinct. In other words, why don't see the halfway intermediary species still living? We see perhaps not one example, at least of something larger than a tiny creature, and even this is debatable. Basically, living systems don't appear to have evolved other than in a micro-manner.
