Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is why you are unqualified to discuss this.Then you are just repeating what I already told you I disagree with. Now it you are still trying to convince me science proves nothing..didn't work.
This is why you are unqualified to discuss this.you are clearly trying to overload me with something I don't know about
Evolution only accounts for our "outside shell." If the outside shell isn't important then it doesn't matter whether God created man from a handful of dust, or from some precursor primate.
This is why you are unqualified to discuss this.
This is why you are unqualified to discuss this.
Which genetic evidence?So what? The genetic evidence still says that we share a common ancestor with chimpanzees.
The original starting point of course. All that a scientist can do is back into the physical evidence that he has. He can’t go back to the very beginningwhat "original and pure" state?
lol, wait.....
Are you saying that a human and a non-human ape had sex, had viable off spring and that we descend from that "hybrid"?
Lots of different kinds of evidence. Take this, for example. The genetic differences between humans and chimpanzees look exactly like lots of accumulated mutations. Why should that be true if the similarities are the result of hybridization?Which genetic evidence?
I don't know what that means in terms of actual genetics. All functional genes in both humans and chimpanzees (and they're almost entirely the same genes) are expressed.The genetic material that is visibly expressed?
Or the genetic material that isn’t visibly expressed?
Evolution only accounts for our "outside shell." If the outside shell isn't important then it doesn't matter whether God created man from a handful of dust, or from some precursor primate.
Is that all you were looking for?
The outside shell?
Right. So the ToE does not contradict Gen 1:27.[
Except my response was to the question asked about how are we created in GOD’s IMAGE
And that isn’t based on the outward (image) at all
It’s based on the inner essence of our being
And that inner essence (our spiritual likeness) has nothing to do with our genetic makeup
Not so much Steve, it tells us what would have had to happen to the comparative genomes.So what? The genetic evidence still says that we share a common ancestor with chimpanzees.
What did you think we “evolved” from and what do you think we are “evolving” to?Right. So the ToE does not contradict Gen 1:27.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?