Naturist Christian Fellowships - could they work here?

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, I copied this from www.themarriagebed.com - very good website, and I thought what is said below was very interesting - from an Christian ex-naturist...


Naked for Christ? Christian Nudism...


We get occasional questions about or from "Christian nudist." We think the Bible is clear that nudity is to be limited to the marriage relationship, but since no single verse says this it's not always easy to "prove" this point. The following was received from a gentleman who spent two years involved in "Christian naturism" several years ago. Having "been there" and "done that" the individual can speak to the issue more directly than we can, and he makes a strong case against nudism for Christians. The author, who wishes to remain anonymous, said he wanted to help others "so they don't make the same foolish choice I did."

I also agree with you that Christian nudism is not a good idea, but not for the reasons you give. Your reasons would be easily dismissed by someone involved with Christian nudism. The problem with addressing this topic is that the Bible really doesn't condemn it. Christian naturists can argue that the problem is not with what they are doing, but with the way society reacts to it. This is true, but how do we wish to change society? Do we want to make them all nudists, or make them all Christians?

First off, it really is not about sex (for most). There are some men who get interested for the wrong reasons, but they are soon disappointed. Where single men are welcome they outnumber the women at least 3 to 1, often more (10 to 1). And the women there are part of a couple. Many places have quotas to maintain gender balance.


*Social nudism ... becomes a wedge that drives spouses apart.*

This leads to the first big, big problem with social nudism in general: It becomes a wedge that drives spouses apart. Almost universally it is the man who becomes interested in this, and almost universally the woman is opposed. They even have a name for this. It is called "the reluctant spouse syndrome." Naturists are constantly trying to figure out how to get more women involved. The man may become obsessed with naturism and go without his spouse. This causes many family problems. Many of the women who do participate with their man do not really want to, but are dragged into it and realize they might get divorced if they don't go along. I met many naturist men who were on wife number 2 or 3, all because the previous spouse refused to get involved. This is the reason they gave me, not my own opinion. And it is very important to have a female companion. Even though it is not about sex, you do not want to be the single male. You are then an outsider. You are excluded from many clubs and events. You are treated with suspicion when allowed to participate. When you do get to participate you are with the many, many other single men who are "off to the side." Many of these men are homosexuals. Most of the couples are at the club that won't let singles in, so all the single guys wind up together where they are welcomed. So the first real problem with Christian nudism is it harms marriages. Those involved are so "into" it that they will deny this point. I speak from experience. I have heard the many, many stories of family problems. Real life stories, not theory.

The second big problem is the effect on your Christian witness and ministry. There are two kinds of Christian naturists. Those who "keep the big secret," and those who don't. Let's look at what happens to the secret naturists first.

They find they cannot trust the other members of their church. They have to make up excuses for where they were last weekend. They don't invite Church friends to their home. Their real friends are their nudist friends. After I became good friends with several Christian nudist couples I learned they were using false names at the clubs and on the Internet. When they came to trust me they told me their real names. The secret keepers have to get the kids involved in keeping the secret also. They come to see Christian brothers and sisters as potential judges. They tend not to get involved with church activities, or to cease to be involved. Some quit practicing "organized religion" and just pray to God and read the Bible for themselves. They know those narrow minded folks at that church would not understand their freedom.

And they are correct. Those who are open about their nudism find they are judged at their church. I know of one couple who were very active in youth ministries. Nudism eventually led to their quitting that church (which had a very dim view of nudism) and moving to another where they were not involved with youth (and where they kept their secret). I know of another couple who were very involved with the music ministry at their church. When their nudist beliefs became known they were told they could not be involved with any church ministries until they repented. They quit, looked for a new church for a short time, and last time I spoke to them they are practicing their religion at home only. I know of another couple who told their pastor, he disapproved so they now attend a church that is farther away. They no longer fellowship with the Christians of their own local community, but drive to where their secret is not known.


I have seen nudism cause disunity in Christian fellowship and trouble in Christian marriages.

Jesus prayed for unity in the body. I have seen nudism cause disunity in Christian fellowship and trouble in Christian marriages. Paul said to lay aside every weight or hindrance and run the race set before us. Nudism is such a hindrance. I have heard several Christians tell me how nudism ended their involvement in ministry. (Of course they didn't see it as a problem with nudism, but as a problem with narrow minded people who just didn't understand how wonderful nudism was.) I have seen nudism wreck a person's witness. You are viewed as a crack pot and nothing you say about faith will be listened to.

I could tell you other stories also. I know a woman who was very upset that her young niece, of whom she was very fond, was no longer allowed to visit them at their home when extended family found out her husband had become a nudist. I know of another woman whose sister will not visit her after she and her husband became nudists. The breaking up of family ties is not good fruit.

Remember earlier when I said it is not about sex for most nudists? For many it is. About 40% of nudists are swingers. This is something Christian nudists just have to live with. You will get invited to swing if you are part of a couple and frequent different resorts. You just say no and they leave you alone. But you will be asked. Another 40% of nudists think the 40% that swing give the whole lifestyle a bad name. These two groups are at odds with each other over the direction that nudism in America should take, but since their overall numbers are so small they feel they need to get along with each other. But the idea of acceptance is just nice talk on web sites and in magazines. The swingers, gays, pagans (nudism is often part of their skyclad religion), and Christians don't like each other, they just tolerate each other. (These numbers came from a reader survey in a Nudist publication I use to subscribe to.)

There is no Bible verse forbidding nudism. But the actual fruits of it tend to be contrary to Biblical teaching. This is why I left the life style. I am now happy, honest and open with my Christian friends at my local church, and involved in a teaching ministry. Nudism offered me "freedom" (bound to secrets), but I have found truth to be a better freedom.

Please do not use my name if you decide to use any of this writing. I have moved on and put this in the past. I only write in hopes of helping others who are being seduced by the Christian nudist web sites.
 
Upvote 0
C

crashedman

Guest
Sascha Fitzpatrick said:
Ok, I copied this from www.themarriagebed.com - very good website, and I thought what is said below was very interesting - from an Christian ex-naturist...


Naked for Christ? Christian Nudism...

<article snipped>

I am familiar with that site, as it was posted on one of the groups that I am subscribed to. Whilst I think it is a very informative site, there are a number of things where I feel that his outlook is skewed.

Myself and a few others had quizzed him as to whether he had actually visited a naturist resort and found out what it is really about. He had said 'no', rather he went by second-hand information.

Secondly, I find it worrying that as a professional counsellour, he doesn't admonish the use of sex toys and sex phone services as an alternative when a partner is away. Are these the sort of things that we should be encouraging in our society?

As a man, the sale of sex toys for women offends me just as much as the abundant availability of magazines like Playboy, Penthouse, Ralph, FHM, Vogue for Men, and Hustler.

What they are doing is encouraging a throwaway world with
the advertising of useless nick-nacks, clothes that fall apart after the 10th wearing and consigned to the Salvos shops in 6 months that are supposed to get you the girls. It's nothing but a lie. You can be clued in to all the latest fashions and have designer clothes and drive a red Ferrari and have the personal charm of a maths teachers blackboard duster, or you can have an average car and a less than average body and still be a hit.


Crashedman
 
Upvote 0
C

crashedman

Guest
crashedman said:
Sascha Fitzpatrick said:
Ok, I copied this from www.themarriagebed.com - very good website, and I thought what is said below was very interesting - from an Christian ex-naturist...


Naked for Christ? Christian Nudism...

<article snipped>

Hi,

To a certain degree I do agree with what the author has to say on this, especially the effect on his ministry is concerned. The problem is really not that much to do with the nudity itself or sex, but societal prejudices.

This is also a crucial question that I have to ask myself as a practitioner of both walks: do I want the whole world to be Christians, or nudists, or at least nude-friendly?

From my own viewpoint, I very much go for the latter. The reason why I say this is because clothing compulsiveness is very unhealthy, as it kills one's self-esteem and sense of comfort with the greatest gift that God gave us - our bodies. It is also short of a wonder why the women of the world, especially Chriostian women haven't yet done anything about it. Many have come a long way in questioning their stereotyped upbringing as to their expectations in society, but oppression and repression abiout the human form is something that they've still to come a long way in overcoming.

The second thing wrong with textilism is that it creates a need to be accepted by society, which the advertising industry has capitalised on (e.g. if you don't buy certain beauty products, or wear Country Road, Levis, Morrissey Edminson, or train in Adidas or NIKE gear, you're worthless).

Jesus taught about these things in his time about the things that the Pagans concern themselves with.

The third problem that a clothes compulsive world has is that it fuels the pornography industry. Did our Aborigines and Native American Indians need porno mags to keep themselves amused? I doubt it. This is something that the Christian movement has to re-think in its attempts to force people to cover up. It certainly doesn't ptrovide any solutions, other than the fdact that it drives people to go to places like strip clubs and adult stores even more. The whole discomfort about sex is the attempt to hide one's reproductive organs (which incidentally women's breasts are not - they are simply sweat glands and part of the excretory system). I'm not totally against erotica, but when it is used to advertise a lifestyle that is inherently family orientated, I tend to get righteously angry about it.

If we as a race were to stop acting so hostile and defensive about sex organs, then I think we can discuss sex more freely and as a result, children would have the tools to make good life choices. The currently trendy paradigm that you've got to first get a girl tanked up or doped for her to ease up on having sex with you is definitely *WRONG*, and guys who do this (regardless of their age) should be banged up in jail on rape charges.

This is the reason why children raised this way don't tend to experiment with sex behind their parent's backs, and they tend to frown upon delinquent behaviour like this. By this, I'm not saying that naturist kids are exclusively angelic, but they don't tend to have such problems with communication and self-expression when relating to the opposite sex in their teenage years like 'normal' kids do.

In the advice I gave to a rape victim on the other forum as to why I think she should stay with her Pagan spirituality is that it is *not* a good idea to wish everyone to become Christian.

As we have no doubt seen from the recent controversies over *cough* H*****g *cough*, the Christian faith has a huge share of problematic people who are spiritual opportunists and their persionalities have the potential of doing more harm than good to others. This is especially so for those who have fiery tempers and a need to scare people into doing exactly what they want, sometimes with threats of violence.

The last thing is, what value do people have in becoming Christians? Aside from scare tactics, what socially redeeming value is there? This is been my problem. I've not really found my life has changed for the better since doing so.

Becoming a Christian hasn't provided me with the wonderful abundant life that Jesus promised me that I feel like going to tell every Tom, Dick or Harry about it. I dunno.


Crashedman
 
Upvote 0

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Crashed - I don't think he advocates sex phone services - just says that if the spouse is away, it is ok to instigate phone sex between each other.

I agree to disagree with you over naturism - personally, the only person I want seeing me naked (on purpose) would be my husband - my naked body is for his enjoyment and eyes alone! :)

Sasch
 
Upvote 0

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
ps. You stated you'd rather have the world nude-friendly than all Christian. I take it by that statement, then, you would not call yourself a Christian, or if you do - you aren't living by the last statement Jesus gave his disciples (usus)

Go therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo,I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.Amen.

If THAT's not the clearest indication from God that the reason I am on earth is to be a witness of Jesus Christ and bring people into the relationship that is Christianity, then I don't know what is! :)

Just my opinion!

I don't feel pressured to buy nike, or Gap, or Country Road - I wear whatever fits best and looks best. If that means KMart, Suzanne Grae or BigW - so be it. I feel worth something REGARDLESS of what brand of clothing I wear. :)

If I was naked all day - I'd get cold! :D And in the environment I work in (Operating Theatre) there'd be a lot more issues about skin cells shedding and thereby contaminating the operating field than there is now. I am required to dress up in MORE clothes because of this - and trust me, they ain't fashionable!

http://www.fotosearch.com/IMG104/114039/

See how attractive that is? But it's a necessity!

Sasch
 
Upvote 0

Icystwolf

Well-Known Member
Jul 5, 2003
2,351
23
Sydney
✟2,596.00
Faith
Calvinist
Busk...

do you know who exactly your dealing with?

Crashedman is with the nudist group that sanctions itself so that its out of material influence which he relates to the world.

There is a whole philosophy behind this system.

My suggestion...stop flooding your thoughts in. Start thinking about it in terms of the whole Bible and it's Theology rather than the snippnets of your interpretation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
T

thejesusfish90

Guest
The last thing is, what value do people have in becoming Christians? Aside from scare tactics, what socially redeeming value is there? This is been my problem. I've not really found my life has changed for the better since doing so.

Becoming a Christian hasn't provided me with the wonderful abundant life that Jesus promised me that I feel like going to tell every Tom, Dick or Harry about it. I dunno.
Crashed, Becoming a christian isn't about gain in this world, or having a better life in this world....Its about whats after this world...In fact I would go on to saying that becoming a chrisitan more often than not entails a great deal of suffering because of your faith, and the worlds opposition to living a godly life. Rather being a christian is more about what we have to look forward to in the future...an eternity with god in his holy presence in paradise, because of his grace in sending Jesus to die for us...how great is that!!...For me this is where my joy comes from, and i suspect that im not the only one...

Your Brother in Christ

Chris
 
Upvote 0
C

crashedman

Guest
Icystwolf said:
Crashedman, have you read how Noah sinned? And how Noah's son sinned with him?

You notice I'll start blowing away your argument...

Jim,

Re-read Gen 9:18-27: Why did God not personally intervene in this matter, if he is so omnipotent? This is what I have against 'free will'. It's even worse today because of man's disocvery of substances which are more physically and pychologically addictive than alcohol.

Not being a fan of alcoholic beverages myself, I quite agree with you that the abuse of alcohol (or any other noxious substance) regardless of whether one is in a textile or nudist environment is unacceptable behaviour and a cause for the reprimand and/or restrainment of the individual.

Noah's son had done something a lot worse than the act of simply seeing his father naked.

According to some Bible scholars, Ham had also performed a sexual act on Noah whilst he was away with the fairies (dreadful pun, but I couldn't resist it!)

The following logic prompts me to ask this: if it was Ham who had done the wrong thing, then why didn't Noah deal with him directly instead of making Canaan suffer? I probably wouldn't do this if I was a grandfather.

The Bible deals with human nakedness in a variety of ways. Nakedness when being forced upon an individual (e.g. the crucifixion of Jesus, strip-searches, and the recent Iraqi prisoner controversy) is a form of humiliation.

Prophetic nudity warns about disasters that will befall people if they do not turn from their evil deeds. Both Micah and Isaiah are not publicly lambasted or arrested for doing this. Being naked while drunk is condemned, whilst celebrational nakedness is uplifted.

Taking advantage of a person's naked condition to perform revolting or violent sexual acts on them against their wishes is enough to guarantee a curse placed upon them both on their physical and sexual health.

Not giving a person clothes to wear when they are suffering from cold is selfishness, and even die-hard naturists will agree on this.

There are also non-Biblical people who are followers of Christ who have written some very positive articles on the effect of human nakedness of a non-sexual context on society.

http://home.att.net/~wdpeck/paper1.htm - this is by a bishop from the Independant Catholic church of America who has done extensive research on the subject. He is also married with a child of his own.

The Pope also made an observation on the issues of sexuality and modesty in 1981 with his book "Love & Responsibility" with this observation:

"Sexual modesty cannot in any simple way be identified with the use of clothing, nor shamelessness with the absence of clothing and total or partial nakedness. . . . Immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of the person, when its aim is to arouse concupiscence, as a result of which the person is put in the position of an object for enjoyment. . . . There are certain objective situations in which even total nudity of the body is not immodest."

This site also creates some good arguments as to why naturism is a valid lifestyle when practised with proper intentions.

http://www.naturistsociety.com/resources/205_180.htm


Crashedman
 
Upvote 0

Icystwolf

Well-Known Member
Jul 5, 2003
2,351
23
Sydney
✟2,596.00
Faith
Calvinist
crashedman said:
Jim,

Re-read Gen 9:18-27: Why did God not personally intervene in this matter, if he is so omnipotent? This is what I have against 'free will'. It's even worse today because of man's disocvery of substances which are more physically and pychologically addictive than alcohol.
If you read the context, the naked-ness was the sin, the fact that he was uncovered.

As for why God did not personally intervene, you didn't ask the correct question.

Theologically speaking, the flood wiped out nearly all of mankind, yet sin has so infused into the human heart, that even Noah sinned. Which tells us, the people reading the Bible that you can't get rid of sin physically.

But in the case of free will, your argument there is so obviously flawed. That is to say, why didn't God stop Adam from eating the apply, why didn't God intervene to stop isreal from going into idolism, why didn't God intervene when he punished the nation of isreal using another nation....

Basically you haven't understood the gist of the Bible and the esence of Christianity.

People in this day and age do sin... otherwise whats the point of Jesus dying on the cross?

Not being a fan of alcoholic beverages myself, I quite agree with you that the abuse of alcohol (or any other noxious substance) regardless of whether one is in a textile or nudist environment is unacceptable behaviour and a cause for the reprimand and/or restrainment of the individual.
I've seen alcohol abuse nearly everywhere... it's condemed throughout the Bible esspecially the New Testament.

Noah's son had done something a lot worse than the act of simply seeing his father naked.

According to some Bible scholars, Ham had also performed a sexual act on Noah whilst he was away with the fairies (dreadful pun, but I couldn't resist it!)
According to "some" scholars.

If that was the case, why is it that the translation did not use any of the adjectives use for "sex"?

Those scholars are doing it by their interpertation, rather than looking at the context...

Basically you're life of being nude, is affecting the way you read the Bible. In the case of reading that passage, you look for another explanation other than being nude...and accept that because you like being nude.

The following logic prompts me to ask this: if it was Ham who had done the wrong thing, then why didn't Noah deal with him directly instead of making Canaan suffer? I probably wouldn't do this if I was a grandfather.
You seriously need to read the Bible more.

The Bible deals with human nakedness in a variety of ways. Nakedness when being forced upon an individual (e.g. the crucifixion of Jesus, strip-searches, and the recent Iraqi prisoner controversy) is a form of humiliation.
There isn't a variety of ways.

Theres public and private nudity...thats it!

Private is when you shower or when you go wash yourself or with your partner. Public is about showing off to everyone...


Prophetic nudity warns about disasters that will befall people if they do not turn from their evil deeds. Both Micah and Isaiah are not publicly lambasted or arrested for doing this. Being naked while drunk is condemned, whilst celebrational nakedness is uplifted.

Taking advantage of a person's naked condition to perform revolting or violent sexual acts on them against their wishes is enough to guarantee a curse placed upon them both on their physical and sexual health.

Not giving a person clothes to wear when they are suffering from cold is selfishness, and even die-hard naturists will agree on this.

There are also non-Biblical people who are followers of Christ who have written some very positive articles on the effect of human nakedness of a non-sexual context on society.

http://home.att.net/~wdpeck/paper1.htm - this is by a bishop from the Independant Catholic church of America who has done extensive research on the subject. He is also married with a child of his own.

The Pope also made an observation on the issues of sexuality and modesty in 1981 with his book "Love & Responsibility" with this observation:

"Sexual modesty cannot in any simple way be identified with the use of clothing, nor shamelessness with the absence of clothing and total or partial nakedness. . . . Immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of the person, when its aim is to arouse concupiscence, as a result of which the person is put in the position of an object for enjoyment. . . . There are certain objective situations in which even total nudity of the body is not immodest."

This site also creates some good arguments as to why naturism is a valid lifestyle when practised with proper intentions.

http://www.naturistsociety.com/resources/205_180.htm


Crashedman
Oh dear catholic reasoning....

Ultimately, you can call yourself a Naturist Catholic...

You're finding reasons and distorting the whole understanding of the scriptures to prove to yourself that you can justify nudity. The Bible warns us that the persons lifestyle affects the way they interperate the scriptures.

You said it yoiurself that you find it hard to see God as omnipotent...if your reading the scriptures and make you think that way, then I'm guessing you're only reading it to hear what you want to hear, rather than a life changing experience that would bring you back in relationship back with God.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Glamgoddess

Active Member
Jan 12, 2004
37
0
39
✟15,149.00
Faith
Christian
Listen people.

If you are not for Naturism, or gong out naked in public, don't bother trying to reason or debate with Dario. He is set in his ideas. God knows I've tried get him to see my side of the coin. :doh: And I meant that in the most sincere way too. He has a fixation on nakedness. :sigh:

Right Dario? You will not stop untill every (woman) one is running about nude.
 
Upvote 0

Icystwolf

Well-Known Member
Jul 5, 2003
2,351
23
Sydney
✟2,596.00
Faith
Calvinist
As I suspected...

In anycase, if it's the obsession of nudity that is pulling you from loving and having faith in Jesus, then you know what to do.

But that obsession is also exibited with my dad, he is obsessed in earning a lot but not interested in losing...now his losing and he still thinks he is rich...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
B

Bevlina

Guest
Hang on Glamgoddess......hang on.....Dariooooooooooooooo!!

The fact is...Dario does NOT have a fixation on nakedness. He has a fixation on the purity of life and how we should lead that life. Joining a nuddie clubbie is a part of of Dario's belief that we should have no shame of our bodies in the raw. And, he is right! There's only one thing. Alot of people are too modest to take their clothes off and run around in the nuddie. I agree with Dario's way of life completely....until it comes to the part where we dispose of our clothes and show our all for all to see.
 
Upvote 0