- Mar 5, 2004
- 17,332
- 6,425
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Have you gone topless in public?I'm not sure it is.
Upvote
0
Have you gone topless in public?I'm not sure it is.
You ask questions, why do you refuse to answer them?What is your view on this post?
There is No Need to #FreeTheNipple - Kevin A. Thompson
Do you think a topless man is nudity too?
Or is there a level of dressing that is not shameful and degrading in nudity sense but not fully proper?
The questions are 1) do you believe that women should not wear bright colors and 2) do you believe that women should not expose their legs. You posted links that made those claims, I want to know if you agree with what you posted.I posted an opinion.
The questions are 1) do you believe that women should not wear bright colors and 2) do you believe that women should not expose their legs. You posted links that made those claims, I want to know if you agree with what you posted.
Then why did you ibtrodice evidence that raised them? If you knew the point was not related to the OP you shouldn't have posted them.Those are not related to the OP of toplessneess.
Those are not related to the OP of toplessneess.
You didn't answer my question either (#1349), and it did focus on toplessness.
Your reply (#1350) dealt with nude men, not topless women...
During the Ethiopian famine of 1984, I saw a topless Ethiopian woman talking to a news reporter. Her breasts were absolutely flat (no fat left) and she pinched one of her nipples to show that she had no milk for her baby.
Do you think male viewers found this arousing?
I found it tragic.
Answers to my questions please.Whats the question?
You know full well what the questions are, and I just repeated them again in post 1384.which ones.
It pretty obvious you don't know a lot about scripture. There are plenty of scriptures that speak of nakedness being shameful except between husband and wife. And then there's the one about the modesty principle and the not doing things that could cause your brother to stumble which violates the law of love. A woman's breasts are meant for her husband not everyone else.
What is your view on this post?
There is No Need to #FreeTheNipple - Kevin A. Thompson
Do you think a topless man is nudity too?
Or is there a level of dressing that is not shameful and degrading in nudity sense but not fully proper?
During the Ethiopian famine of 1984, I saw a topless Ethiopian woman talking to a news reporter. Her breasts were absolutely flat (no fat left) and she pinched one of her nipples to show that she had no milk for her baby.
Do you think male viewers found this arousing?
I found it tragic.
It keeps being claimed on this thread, "where does the bible say breasts are nudity"?
The Bible doesn't say the groin is nudity either does it. Does it say anywhere that the male groin or the female groin is nudity? I hope you are not claiming that since the Bible doesn't specifically say that it's ok to run around with out pants.
It does talk about the requirements that priests where undergarments but they also we're required to wear other special clothing as well that the general populace wasn't required to wear. There aren't an passages that say "thou shalt wear pants or underwear". Therefore according to some folks ideas then it's not specifically prohibited so we should be able to run around without groin coverage.
Exodus 28:42). What was considered nakedness? Exposing the loins and/or the thighs. Another helpful passage is Isaiah 47:2-3. This passage says: “Remove your veil, strip off the skirt, uncover the leg (thigh, KJV), cross the rivers. Your nakedness will be uncovered, your shame also will be exposed.” When one’s thigh is uncovered, they are considered naked.