probinson
Legend
- Aug 16, 2005
- 22,330
- 2,959
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
You clearly don't have the decency to apologise for your blatantly wrong claims about my posts.
I honestly have no idea what you want me to apologize for. That's why I'm asking you the question; Do you not think it's important to try the spirits? From everything I've discussed with you on this forum, I would say that you think trying the spirits is important.
So here I sit, wondering what the heck I've said that is "blatantly wrong" about your posts.
You even go as far as to deny you said what you said.
I know what I said. So does everyone else who can read.
I never said that you were the one that introduced the phrase "try the spirits" to the discussions when a testimony was presented. What's sad is, you know that, and yet you still try to insist that I did. As much as it would help your accusations if I did, it simply is not true, and I am disheartened that you would resort to such tactics in an attempt to disparage me.
So I suppose I can apologize for not being more clear, or for causing you to jump to incorrect conclusions with the way I chose to word my post, but I'm not apologizing for your wrong understanding of what I actually said.
FTR, I had decided that I would answer your question if you apologised. But that ship has now left...
Well, it looks like this is where I get to exercise my healthy dose of skepticism...
You've concocted this whole woe-is-me scenario, painted me as the bad guy, and claimed that I need to apologize for things I've said about your posts that are "blatantly wrong", yet you've absolutely refused to clarify what it is you want me to apologize for.
I suspect that is because you do think it is important to try the spirits, and if you answered that way, it would seem quite silly for me to apologize for saying so.
Last edited:
Upvote
0