lesliedellow
Member
- Sep 20, 2010
- 9,654
- 2,582
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, it does.
And I was going to point that out in my OP, but thought against it.
I just wanted to give some TEs a little support over the {non-existence of God because of chaos} arguments.
If I'm understanding you correctly, such a demonstration would essentially disprove theistic evolution.
Theistic evolution is a perfectly acceptable stance, and there is no counterdemonstration.
Theistic evolution (evolutionary creationism) can take a hike.
SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
I am torn betwix the 2......
...................................................
...................................
Why would a fossil be "great evidence for creation"?...................................................
What should we have?Creationists have none.
Why would a fossil be "great evidence for creation"?
There were no fossils at the time.
What should we have?
(Please be specific.)
I say no evidence was generated.
That is correct.Good question, since there is no evidence for creation.
Why don't you just call a spade a spade and say you think we should all be suffering from inbreeding depression like the cheetah?If your myth was true we would see a massive population bottleneck for people.
Right, no evidence for an event that should be blatantly obvious.That is correct.
There is no evidence for creation: specifically, the creation week.
Why don't you just call a spade a spade and say you think we should all be suffering from inbreeding depression like the cheetah?
Stop watering it down by calling it a "bottleneck".
It wasn't a bottleneck event, and you know it.
Ya ... so blatantly obvious that the One who committed it documented it for our learning.Right, no evidence for an event that should be blatantly obvious.
Excuse me?But we shouldn't be. You are the one making that claim.
There you go.Subduction Zone said:I know that we are evolved beings and the lack of a bottleneck is perfectly understandable.
Then you're Arab phoning it, hoping I won't catch it.Subduction Zone said:And I am not watering down anything.
You're calling a bottleneck event a "bottleneck" ... and you have no idea what you're talking about, geologist.Subduction Zone said:I am simply calling a "spade a spade" just as you requested.
Nope, we know that is not the case. You believe that your God cannot lie. For Genesis to be literally true your God would have to be a serial liar.Ya ... so blatantly obvious that the One who committed it documented it for our learning.
I don't know where you're getting this 'blatantly obvious' stuff from ... but it can take a hike.
Excuse me?
Where did I call the creation week a bottleneck event?
I'm not trying to slip out the back door now by Arab phoning "bottleneck event" to "bottleneck".
You must think I'm too stupid to catch that.
There you go.
A bottleneck what? event? recovery? extinction? what?
I think you're too smart to use the term "bottleneck event," as that would imply a large population being pared down to just two people; when you know as well as I do you're going in the wrong direction.
The population wasn't pared down to two people, it started out as one person and moved up to two.
Drop the bottleneck bologna if you want to discuss the creation week ... and drop your inbreeding depression junk along with it.
I'm not inbred depressed, and I suspect you aren't either.
Then you're Arab phoning it, hoping I won't catch it.
You're calling a bottleneck event a "bottleneck" ... and you have no idea what you're talking about, geologist.
Ya ... that's true.And you are the one claiming "inbreeding junk". Not me.
You're smart enough not to play the Inbreeding Depression card, aren't you?If your myth was true we would see a massive population bottleneck for people.
Ya ... that's true.
You don't have the guts to call a spade a spade, do you?
(That is, use the inbreeding depression argument.)
Here's what you said:
You're smart enough not to play the Inbreeding Depression card, aren't you?
A 'massive population bottleneck' without a bottleneck event ... LOL ... only on Litmus paper.
There was a massive pileup on Interstate TWZ last night.
Thank goodness nothing happened (no event took place).
I'm not gonna belabor this point any longer.The Tilt-a-Whirl, a product of intelligent design, uses chaotic motion to perform its function.
Demonstrate how God could have done the same, but didn't.
Took you three month of intense thinking to arrive at that conclusion?I'm not gonna belabor this point any longer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?