My Rock Challenge

[British Bulldog]

http://www.christianforums.com/t7598334-64/#post58859583

Why did you give me a link to a post with a quote about ID losing a court case?

We're not the one who believe in microbe to man phenomena so the charlatans etc are quite misplaced.

It always amazed me that people who base their whole lives and worldview on faith try and use the incredulity argument against evidence based theories.

We already have, and we continue to invent and research.

Strange, I wouldn't have thought turning one's back on materialism involved using computers. I'd have thought it would be more about living a simple life with as few possessions as possible. Maybe you have a different interpretation.

 

[British Bulldog]

One can employ coherency and still overstep his privileges.

A policeman can arrest a wino as well as a lawyer.

Did you report him?

 

[mzungu]

The only thing left for me to add to this debate is: "Thou shalt not bear false witness" and "Hypocrites and Pharisees"!

What ever happened to humility, love, compassion, spiritualness Sad to see a religion being turned into a political party and or a replacement for science!

I wish to bid this thread good bye before I too am banished!

 

[Greg1234]

Why did you give me a link to a post with a quote about ID losing a court case?

It always amazed me that people who base their whole lives and worldview on faith try and use the incredulity argument against evidence based theories.

Scientific community or inquiring community?

Strange, I wouldn't have thought turning one's back on materialism involved using computers. I'd have thought it would be more about living a simple life with as few possessions as possible. Maybe you have a different interpretation.

Ah but we're talking about world views.

A very fine underlying cause of reality vs atoms are The Cause and all that exist.

The first is God, the other is naturalism.

Which allows you to build things using atoms? Both do

Which allows you to advance past atoms? The first.

Which allowed you to get to atoms in the first place? The first

Which side hypocritically emulates the worldview of the other? The latter

Which side is disposable? The latter

 

[AV1611VET]

Did you report him?

No

 

[British Bulldog]

You are aware that the reason ID lost had nothing to do with evolution I presume. You do at least know that much I hope.

I decided not to reply to the rest of your post as I'd probably end up being too sarcastic.

 

[AV1611VET]

The only thing left for me to add to this debate is: "Thou shalt not bear false witness" and "Hypocrites and Pharisees"!

What ever happened to humility, love, compassion, spiritualness Sad to see a religion being turned into a political party and or a replacement for science!

I wish to bid this thread good bye before I too am banished!

-- You can't say what you want to say within the confines of acceptable protocol?

 

[mzungu]

No

Having known AV for some time now, I am sure that he did not press the button. He may be a hard nut to crack but he certainly does not resort to such actions!

 

[mzungu]

-- You can't say what you want to say within the confines of acceptable protocol?

If one takes into consideration the cultural differences between the US and other countries then the defining line between what is acceptable protocol and what is not is a grey area to say the least. But if I give real examples then I am afraid I will be breaking CF protocols.

 

[British Bulldog]

Having known AV for some time now, I am sure that he did not press the button. He may be a hard nut to crack but he certainly does not resort to such actions!

I have no reason to doubt he is telling the truth.

How long had Nathan Poe been here then? I seem to remember him having a join date sometime in the early 2000s. Banning someone after all that time seems bizarre to me.

 

[rikerjoe]

There are theistic inventors and inquirers. We would be just fine without materialism.

No, you wouldn't. You wouldn't survive a month without materialism. Even your "theistic inventors" needs materialism to do anything useful in this world.

 

[rikerjoe]

We already have, and we continue to invent and research.

Examples, please.

 

[AV1611VET]

How long had Nathan Poe been here then? I seem to remember him having a join date sometime in the early 2000s.

He joined 21 September 2002.

Banning someone after all that time seems bizarre to me.

Tenure doesn't guarantee immunity; and no one that I know of said he is gone for good.

 

[British Bulldog]

He joined 21 September 2002.

Tenure doesn't guarantee immunity; and no one that I know of said he is gone for good.

Oh right, it's a temporary ban is it? OK, that makes more sense.

 

[AV1611VET]

Oh right, it's a temporary ban is it? OK, that makes more sense.

I have no idea -- I just know that he is not currently with us under that name.

 

[Hog Red]

I guess evos need to get their [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]zu in order

 

[Greg1234]

No, you wouldn't. You wouldn't survive a month without materialism. Even your "theistic inventors" needs materialism to do anything useful in this world.

Explain to me how the belief that the universe is made up only of atoms is needed to do "anything useful."

Then I'll tell you how the belief that there is a finer cause gave you the very atoms you use today.

 

[Greg1234]

Examples, please.

See ID and medicine for now.

 

[Hog Red]

You have just betrayed your ignorance on Evolution. Evolution does not explain HOW LIFE BEGAN but HOW LIFE EVOLVED AFTER IT BEGAN. If you are going to continue to put forth false claims then remember this: "Thou shalt not bear false witness"

educate me then, how did life begin since you are all knowing. my [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]zu wants to know. evolution is the biggest hoax ever! i understand you have to believe in a lie or admit there is a God.

 

[AV1611VET]

educate me then, how did life begin...

They don't know, but they want you to believe it too -- and call it "science".