Yep, reality typically trumps fantasy.No, I call it 'stooping' when I can get someone to use his last trump card: getting him to admit he doesn't think it is real [or literal] in the first place.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yep, reality typically trumps fantasy.No, I call it 'stooping' when I can get someone to use his last trump card: getting him to admit he doesn't think it is real [or literal] in the first place.
As I said earlier, it's not something that simply defies a force that is inherent in a system. It is logically impossible. It's like saying a piece of wood is 6 inches long, but when the length is measured, it only reaches the 2-inch line. This is not a paradox, it is a contradiction. It's 2 inches because that's the line it reaches, because that's how we define length. Even God cannot create such a piece of wood without making it change size whenever it's held up to a ruler. This isn't because God's powers are limited, but because it's a logical contradiction. He also can't create a rock so heavy he is unable to control it, for the same reason.It takes Someone omnipotent to pull it off.
Your definition doesn't match your description. You say there's no history, but then you say (in the mannequin example) that the man created should have "a job, a wife, and kids." That's not maturity, that's history. He actually went out and did something rather than sitting around "maturing." Something other than aging occurred.I define Embedded Age as: maturity without history.
I know you guys really want me to stick history in there somewhere, but it's not going to happen.
Logic can take a hike.It is logically impossible.
You have a strange definition of "gullible."You guys have a level of gullibility all your own, though.
You'll believe anything that has more evidence for it, than against it
Pluto has little directly to do with evidence. It has more to do with definitions.--- like Pluto.
No, I call it 'stooping' when I can get someone to use his last trump card: getting him to admit he doesn't think it is real [or literal] in the first place.
sorry no its a failure at understanding english and twisting wordsIt's a 'paradox'.
so what? dictionaries don't define words, they list definitions that we use, most people except for you use the words to be synonymsWithout even looking --- I can tell you it is definition #4.
And did you get that?
#4
too bad you fail to understand how everyone else uses age, you just define it any ol way you want.That means that there are three other definitions --- not just the one that you are using here.I could simplify it even more, if I have to.
i understand that you keep trying to make arguments but they all are just fluff that fails at answering anything.I could use the only phrase that I think you guys truly understand: GOD DID IT.
YAY! X can take a hike!Logic can take a hike.
Logic can take a hike.
That's right ---Except when crossing the street, right AVET? Or when turining on a light switch, driving a car, cooking a meal, darning socks, taking a shower, etc., etc.
That's right ---
When applied to us, they have some merit; but when applied to God, they can take a hike.
Remember, these laws (Thermodynamics, Gravity, Logic, etc.) do not apply to God.
Yes, He can --- it's called Transcendence.Then God cannot exist in this universe![]()
Yes, He can --- it's called Transcendence.
That's right ---
When applied to us, they have some merit; but when applied to God, they can take a hike.
Remember, these laws (Thermodynamics, Gravity, Logic, etc.) do not apply to God.
That's right ---
When applied to us, they have some merit; but when applied to God, they can take a hike.
Remember, these laws (Thermodynamics, Gravity, Logic, etc.) do not apply to God.
Well, I've asked for evidence that the moon was created ex nihilo; and I've gotten 16 pages of nihilo.Indeed.. we are talking about us, and the moon, and the earth, etc. Not God. Everytime reality contradicts your dogmatic understanding of the universe, you throw God out and claim "He" says different, or you say such-and-such can "Take a Hike." It's nothing but a Cop-Out.
Well, I've asked for evidence that the moon was created ex nihilo; and I've gotten 16 pages of nihilo.
I'm going to go ahead, per my OP, and assume you guys cannot produce any.
The reason for this thread, is that I intend to QV people to this thread from now on, instead of my Apple Challenge thread.
In effect, it replaces my Apple Challenge.