My Lunar Challenge

[AV1611VET]

If the virtual particle created races away from the black hole while the original particle crosses it, then the virtual particle can't be reabsorbed and thus there is something created from nothing.

Do you know what we mean when we say God created the earth from "nothing"?

Nothing means nothing -- and that means no energy either.

If I stick my finger in a wall socket and get zapped, I don't saying I got electrocuted by nothing.

 

[Kylie]

Do you know what we mean when we say God created the earth from "nothing"?

Nothing means nothing -- and that means no energy either.

If I stick my finger in a wall socket and get zapped, I don't saying I got electrocuted by nothing.

Did you even read my post and try to understand what I was saying?

 

[AirPo]

Got board AV? had to Necro a 9 year old thread to get more attention?

For the third time no less.

 

[AirPo]

Did I not say FOR REASONS OBVIOUS?

Yes, the obvious reason is you're bored.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yes, the obvious reason is you're bored.

Isn't it ironic that a hippy beachcomber would complain about thread necroing?

 

[AirPo]

Isn't it ironic that a hippy beachcomber would complain about thread necroing?

No.

 

[AV1611VET]

No.

Is that de Nile behind you?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Did you even read my post and try to understand what I was saying?

Hawking radiation is another of those never observed Fairie Dust things.....

You want black holes and the laboratory to go together?

Accept the laboratory results..... 2:20 on the timeline

 

[AirPo]

Is that de Nile behind you?

No, it's the ocean.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, it's the ocean.

Just wondering.

 

[Kylie]

Hawking radiation is another of those never observed Fairie Dust things.....

Wow, you're behind the times. It was observed in 2010. First Observation of Hawking Radiation

Try to keep up with recent developments, will you?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Wow, you're behind the times. It was observed in 2010. First Observation of Hawking Radiation

Try to keep up with recent developments, will you?

Sigh.... seing radiation created in a lab does not equate to radiation from imaginary black holes in space....

Now had they used a black hole in the lab......

And as they said: "That’s an astounding claim and one that many physicists will want to pour over before popping any champagne corks.

And now that it’s been observed once, expect a rash of other announcements as researchers race to repeat the result."

And nothing has been heard since....... Seems it hasn't been repeated.....

So apparently you are popping your cork with no reason to at all.....

And it is laughable that people think high energy laser pulses are equivalent to normal starlight......

Whatever they need to make their fantasies become believable....

is this kind of like the experiment that produced astrophysical jets from electricity then they postulated from spinning black holes in space????