Sorn
Well-Known Member
- Jan 8, 2018
- 1,381
- 316
- 62
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Its very interesting & telling that when the passage you provided is hovered over with the mouse it shows this:How does 2 Tim 2:15 show there is “more than one message in the Bible?
15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
Your speaker on the YouTube, again just quotes verses out of context and does not address what contradicts, his interpretation of the verses he quoted. He started with: Matt. 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. 6 Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel. 7 As you go, proclaim this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’ 8 Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy,[a] drive out demons. Freely you have received; freely give.
How does this interpretation not contradict what Jesus did, going to a city in Samaria and spending days there preaching? (John 4:1-26)
Or Peter going to Samaria, just after Stephen’s stoning before Paul comes on the scene?
Matt. 10 is prior to Christianity, and it is Jesus sending naivest disciples, out to make way His coming to teach, so they were not ready to approach Gentiles and Samaritans, so Jesus tells them to stay away from then, and we can add “for now”.
The “command” in Matt. 10 is for early on in Christ’s ministry and not something now and forever more, “do not go to the Samaritans and Gentiles.”
Every verse must be researched in lite of all other verses to come up with the very best interpretation or you will just have a ton of “exceptions”.
Notice how it has the word 'dividing' in it. Yet when you quote it it has remarkably changed to this :
"a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth."
So you couldn't use the word as it was but had to change it to say something that agrees with your viewpoint.
You can't accept that the Bible may be actually be saying 'there is 1 msg for one group & another msg for another'. Learn to discern the 2 msgs.
So to you it can only be, not 'separate the word correctly' but 'treat it rightly' or harmonize it, when if that is what the author wanted to say he could have used far clearer language than 'dividing'.
As to Samaria, Samaritans were Hebrew/Israelite/Jewish descendants. Jerusalem Jews & Samaritans had several doctrinal disagreements. Samaritans had intermarried (against Mosaic law). They were despised & considered unclean (even worst then gentiles because they were Jews) by the Pharisees. Samaritans worshiped the same God, YHVH as all Jews did. They accepted Torah. But, only the 1st 5 books.
Jesus was passing by & after His encounter with the woman the people cam out and were eager to hear Him so He taught them but that does not change the fact that His primary purpose was to be there for the Jews, to reach out to them as their Messiah if they would recognize Him & accept Him which they did not. A short diversion in His preaching was not going to Jeopardize that or alter it & the Samaritans would still not be the ones to take the msg to the Gentiles, that was for Paul to do.
"and we can add “for now”. " You are adding to or changing scripture in order to fit what you want to see again.
Upvote
0