Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where is religious science taught which is based on evidence and peer reviewed?Theistic evolution (a.k.a., guided evolution) is evolution as it is taught in religious science.
Like junk science?It illustrates the nonsense and dangers of what happens when one uses adjectives to describe science.
And since no distinction is required...Not if a distinction is required.
Actually it is.And since no distinction is required...
This may have something to do with your "evolutionists" being imaginary boogiemen, created by creationist apologetic writers.Actually it is.
And another distinction I've seen academians deny now is cosmic evolution.
It's as if evolutionists don't want to have to make a distinction between different types for some reason.
Either that, or Harvard University has it depicted graphically.This may have something to do with your "evolutionists" being imaginary boogiemen, created by creationist apologetic writers.
... which it hasn't.Either that, or Harvard University has it depicted graphically.
Wow -- LOL -- okie-doke.... which it hasn't.
Which one? There are a few million at last estimateWow -- LOL -- okie-doke.
What is that picture from Harvard University that the whole Internet world can see then?
The one we're talking about.Which one?
And??? Which one is that?The one we're talking about.
Try answering my question instead of cherry picking.Like junk science?
That's because you're looking at the term from a science [class] perspective.I was taught in the Catholic education system and learnt about evolution in biology.
Despite being in a Catholic school, evolution was taught as a science subject which excludes any divine or metaphysical considerations.
Science is about "how" not "why" and therefore there is no distinction between theistic and atheistic evolution which turn out to being nonsensical terms.
That's because you're looking at the term from a science [class] perspective.
Try understanding the term from an English [class] perspective.
Theistic evolution (a.k.a., guided evolution) is evolution as it is taught in religious science.
Flat Earthism Ogg the Trogg
Geocentrism Ptolemy
Atheistic Evolution Epicurus/Lucretius
Gap Theory Origen of Alexandria / Scofield Reference Bible
Day-Age Theory Saint Augustine / William Jennings Bryan
Theistic Evolution Thomas Aquinas / Leibniz
Progressive Creation Cuvier / Agassiz
Bonus: Omphalos Gosse
Young Earth Creationism McCready Price / Henry Morris
There is no such thing as Atheistic evolution. There is only the ToE.Okay.Atheistic evolution (a.k.a., evolution) is evolution as it is taught in secular science.
It is not about guided evolution which is involves a designer. It is not taught in religious science it is a belief that God started evolution and that A&E were created by God.
Here we go again.There is no such thing as Atheistic evolution.
Here we go again.
But in English class, where they teach that adjectives modify nouns, there is.
It seems that according to your chronology,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?