- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,856
- 52,569
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
No ... it's another thread about how the educated mess with Jesus' life.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No ... it's another thread about how the educated mess with Jesus' life.Is this another thread about embedded age? If so, *yawn*
Why do scientists need to make excuses for a mistake they didn't make? Surely it's Christians who need to be apologizing?What's scientists excuse today?
I don't subscribe to Satan's, 'Yea, hath God said' tactic.Actually, all you can say is, "IT IS CLAIMED that there is a side to reality we don't see..."
Yes.And the Ganesha Chaturthi is evidence for Ganesha, by the same logic, yes?
Then don't. They're ignorant as heck anyway.Why do scientists need to make excuses for a mistake they didn't make?
For what?Bungle_Bear said:Surely it's Christianity that needs to be apologizing?
If an ignit got it right what do you call the Christian who got it wrong in the first place?Then later some ignit comes along and says, "Not so. He was actually born in 4BC", for God knows what reason?
Yes.
Only I don't see Ganesha Chaturthi quite the same way you may think I should.
And they did ... just for the educated to use against God.Except that people could write that just as easily...
I do.Why don't you view it as evidence for the existence of other gods the same way you see Christmas as evidence for Jesus?
I have a set of Boolean standards I use.Kylie said:Oh, right, you pick and choose what you want to accept as evidence.
No ... it's another thread about how the educated mess with Jesus' life.
And they did ... just for the educated to use against God.
We call that: diabolical plagiarism.
The educated today soak it up like a sponge.
Right.Indeed -- shame on the church for getting the year wrong!
Right.
As long as scientists have a church to blame, they'll persecute us to the ends of the earth.
(Oops! Did I imply the earth was flat!?)
I know one foreign lady who accepted Christ early in life.
Later, she was captured and tortured for her beliefs.
She said her captors beat her constantly while demanding she tell them how God created the earth out of nothing.
I learn just enough, so I can separate the wheat from the chaff.As do you, AV... as do you.
Neither.Who set the original "AD 1" date? Scientists or the church?
I learn just enough, so I can separate the wheat from the chaff.
That's why I'm so ignit, I can't discuss the nuances of genetics -- or any other discipline.
Once I recognize it as chaff, it's history.
Don't get me wrong.
Sometimes I might wade out a little bit further in Satan's Pond, but not too deep.
Besides, it's too crowded out there.
Too many scientists.
Now you know why the book of Revelation describes the Antichrist coming out of the sea.
It's the sea of humanity.
Neither.
It was Jesus Christ who did.
And all He had to do was show up.
Oh, I just shiver in my shoes when science comes knocking.You know enough to know what to be afraid of. Got it.
Thanks for the QED.At least four years early -- I've heard of premature births, but that's ridiculous!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?