RC, would you please explain this post to me?
I have no idea what you said.
He's trying to imply that water must have magically appeared and disappeared because the world's oceans do not contain enough water. I've fact checked him on this issue before, and here he is still regurgitating garbage... Because as we all know, garbage is all RC has.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/e...r-holds-three-times-much-water-earths-oceans/
"Earth is a jewel of the solar system, painted blue by the vast oceans that hold the majority of our planet’s water—
or so we thought. Most of Earth’s water, according to a new study, may actually be locked in a reservoir 400 miles underground."
RC still thinks that.
"So Jacobsen and his team went looking for dampness lurking deep underground by monitoring the seismic waves generated by earthquakes. Because the velocity of these waves changes depending on what kind of material they’re passing through—like, for example, if a mineral is wet or dry—measuring that speed can give geologists a map of what’s below the Earth’s surface."
"If all the ringwoodite in the transition zone is as damp as the samples that Jacobsen and his team detected, that layer would hold three times as much water as all of the Earth’s oceans combined, reducing their share from 96.5% of all known water to a relatively paltry 24.8%. In other words, the ringwoodite discovery could quadruple the amount of water found on Earth. A blue planet, indeed."
RC simply has a problem with the reality he is supposed to check. He just never checks reality before he speaks....
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...arths-oceans-located/articleshow/36493512.cms
So now people should understand the ummm, reality, where the fountains of the deep bursting forth came from.....