My Academic Challenge

[davetaff]

There is no evidence of that outside the Bible, which throws into question those parts of the Bible.

I understand that is your believe, but without evidence, there is no reason for us to accept it.

Hi Paul's thank you for your reply but if one needs evidence then one dose not believe we must believe Gods word not try to proove it right or wrong.

Love and Peace
Dave

 

[AV1611VET]

Were do you get 2348 BC from I cant find it in scripture?

It's arrived at by adding the stated genealogies in the Bible.

Bishop Usher did that in the past, and I go with his calculations.

 

[Paulos23]

Hi Paul's thank you for your reply but if one needs evidence then one dose not believe we must believe Gods word not try to proove it right or wrong.

Love and Peace
Dave

Why?

 

[davetaff]

Am I reading this correctly?

The Flood was in 2348 BC.

4000 years after the Flood would make it AD 2349.

Hi AV1611VET THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY BUT I prefer to believe Gods word against mans word we must use the creation account beginning with Noah it's the only thing that makes sense of the forth day and when Christ cured the man of blindness and he saw men as trees walking we are towards the end of the 6th day and all of what that means.

Love and peace
Dave

 

[durangodawood]

If the Bible is supposed to be regarded as a catalog of various material facts, then yeah, its wrong in a number of instances - and I feel adequately educated to be confident about this.

But that "if" there is a big IF.