Moon light - the word of God vs falsely so called science

[Kylie]

But space is not empty. Science, nasa, government who faked going to the moon, has taken full advantage of the modern light pollution that most people experience.

Most people believe the sky(raqia) above is pitch black with a moon and a few stars. 95% (estimate) of people in america do not see the raqia as God created it.

But if a person can get away from man created light pollution. The night raqia sky is full of light it is not pitch black.

which is it


View attachment 259796

View attachment 259795


Just like this (i believe) this intentional miss information given by science.

from this website: Why can't you see stars during the day? (Beginner) - Curious About Astronomy? Ask an Astronomer

Why can't you see stars during the day? (Beginner)
I'm a teacher in a daycare. Each week we have a theme for are program. Last week it was the stars in the sky. This little boy asked me "why do stars glow at night and not during the day?" I did't know what to answer so maybe you can help me answer this question for the little boy.

Stars do glow during the day, but we can't see them because of the glare of sunlight. When the sun is up, the blue color in sunlight gets scattered all over the atmosphere, turning the sky the familiar bright blue color. This blue light is much brighter than the faint light coming from the stars, so it prevents us from seeing them.

If you were standing on the Moon, for instance, where there is no atmosphere, you would see the stars both day and night.

But you also get this:

People also ask
Why are there no stars in the moon pictures?
The dim light of the stars simply does not provide enough exposure to record visible images. All manned landings happened during the lunar daytime. Thus, the stars were outshone by the sun and by sunlight reflected off the Moon's surface.
Moon landing conspiracy theories - Wikipedia

Moon landing conspiracy theories - Wikipedia

You do know that space doesn't have an atmosphere, right? There is no air in space, just here on Earth.

 

[d taylor]

You do know that space doesn't have an atmosphere, right? There is no air in space, just here on Earth.

Really what is the point of back and forth on this. You believe there is an outer space why because you believe science.

I do not believe there is an outer space why because everything (sun, moon and stars) i see is in the raqia. when i look up i am looking at the first heaven/sky. I am not looking through the first heaven into outer space.

So you can say "you know space does not have atmosphere" no i do not know that because i do not believe an outer space exist.


The highest a man has traveled up is probably 20 to 30 miles high. If that is even believable height is deceptional

 

[Kylie]

Really what is the point of back and forth on this. You believe there is an outer space why because you believe science.

I do not believe there is an outer space why because everything (sun, moon and stars) i see is in the raqia. when i look up i am looking at the first heaven/sky. I am not looking through the first heaven into outer space.

So you can say "you know space does not have atmosphere" no i do not know that because i do not believe an outer space exist.


The highest a man has traveled up is probably 20 to 30 miles high. If that is even believable height is deceptional

Wow, your denial of science is amazing. You do realise that it can be checked, right? And yet you would have us believe that there is some amazing conspiracy to hide this from us? What purpose could that serve? Why would this need to be hidden?

 

[Ophiolite]

Really what is the point of back and forth on this. You believe there is an outer space why because you believe science.

I do not believe there is an outer space why because everything (sun, moon and stars) i see is in the raqia. when i look up i am looking at the first heaven/sky. I am not looking through the first heaven into outer space.

So you can say "you know space does not have atmosphere" no i do not know that because i do not believe an outer space exist.


The highest a man has traveled up is probably 20 to 30 miles high. If that is even believable height is deceptional

You should start a new thread to let us know what life is like circa 4,000 B.C. It could be fascinating.

 

[Subduction Zone]

But space is not empty. Science, nasa, government who faked going to the moon, has taken full advantage of the modern light pollution that most people experience.

Most people believe the sky(raqia) above is pitch black with a moon and a few stars. 95% (estimate) of people in america do not see the raqia as God created it.

But if a person can get away from man created light pollution. The night raqia sky is full of light it is not pitch black.

which is it


View attachment 259796

View attachment 259795


Just like this (i believe) this intentional miss information given by science.

from this website: Why can't you see stars during the day? (Beginner) - Curious About Astronomy? Ask an Astronomer

Why can't you see stars during the day? (Beginner)
I'm a teacher in a daycare. Each week we have a theme for are program. Last week it was the stars in the sky. This little boy asked me "why do stars glow at night and not during the day?" I did't know what to answer so maybe you can help me answer this question for the little boy.

Stars do glow during the day, but we can't see them because of the glare of sunlight. When the sun is up, the blue color in sunlight gets scattered all over the atmosphere, turning the sky the familiar bright blue color. This blue light is much brighter than the faint light coming from the stars, so it prevents us from seeing them.

If you were standing on the Moon, for instance, where there is no atmosphere, you would see the stars both day and night.

But you also get this:

People also ask
Why are there no stars in the moon pictures?
The dim light of the stars simply does not provide enough exposure to record visible images. All manned landings happened during the lunar daytime. Thus, the stars were outshone by the sun and by sunlight reflected off the Moon's surface.
Moon landing conspiracy theories - Wikipedia

Moon landing conspiracy theories - Wikipedia

You really need to take some basic science classes. Only very foolish or very ignorant people believe that the moonlandings were faked. Do you understand the limitations of video at that time?

 

[Radagast]

The technology in the 50s were so primitive...it's just unimaginable, it boggles the mind how they could even get to outerspace using that trash.

Programming was so utterly bad that there's even a famous quote by the legend of structured programming edgar dijkstra, "you're doing it wrong".

Did you mean Edsger Dijkstra? And did he really say that?

And the 50's/60's was a great era for computing:

• Lisp (1958)
• Semi-Automatic Ground Environment or SAGE (1958)
• ALGOL 60 (1960)
• Burroughs Master Control Program (1961)
• FORTRAN IV (1962)
• APL (1963)
• BASIC (1964)
• Simula 67 (1960)
• SNOBOL (1967)
• BCPL (1967)

Margaret Hamilton, who helped develop the Apollo 11 software, was a pioneer of software engineering.

 

[Kate30]

You really need to take some basic science classes. Only very foolish or very ignorant people believe that the moonlandings were faked. Do you understand the limitations of video at that time?

Subduction why do you find no soil disturbance from the effects from the rocket when these craft supposedly land on the moon

 

[Radagast]

Subduction why do you find no soil disturbance from the effects from the rocket when these craft supposedly land on the moon

1. What disturbance were you expecting to find, for a rocket engine operating at 1/6 G?

2. What would you expect to happen to dust kicked up by the engines?

3. The moon doesn't have "soil," it has "regolith."

 

[Kate30]

1. What disturbance were you expecting to find, for a rocket engine operating at 1/6 G?

2. What would you expect to happen to dust kicked up by the engines?

From the rocket yes . Also the landing arms spotless as well.

 

[Radagast]

From the rocket yes . Also the landing arms spotless as well.

I asked two questions:

1. What disturbance were you expecting to find, for a rocket engine operating at 1/6 G?

2. What would you expect to happen to dust kicked up by the engines?

 

[Kate30]

Well seems rather odd that you have no soil disturbance. The astronauts certainly had no trouble kicking soil around with their boots I’m sure that engine is a whole lot more powerful than the astronauts boot. Just a observation.

 

[Radagast]

Well seems rather odd that you have no soil disturbance. The astronauts certainly had no trouble kicking soil around with their boots I’m sure that engine is a whole lot more powerful than the astronauts boot. Just a observation.

1. The moon doesn't have "soil," it has "regolith."

2. The moon has lower gravity, so the rocket used was much less powerful than one you'd use on Earth.

3. The moon has no air, so dust kicked up just drops straight back down.

4. There is indeed a depression under the Apollo 11 lander, due to dust blown away, but it's only 10 to 15 cm deep.

 

[Kate30]

Well you call it regolith if you like . Yes we all know that the rocket was far less powerful than the one used with the launch. And that the gravity on the moon is no doubt much less. But Pre moon NASA docs do say differently of what the landing on the moon would be like along with many others .And what of the +250 degree temperatures up there? So the dust just falls down all around the Luna module but not on it. Ok. That’s what one would call precision dust falling I guess.

 

[Tom 1]

I will admit writing and communicating through the written word is not a strong area for me.

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.
But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

Moon
View attachment 259757

What are your actual beliefs about the moon? Do you believe it to be lit from the inside or something of that sort? What do you think the lighter and darker patches are? I'm just asking out of curiosity.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Subduction why do you find no soil disturbance from the effects from the rocket when these craft supposedly land on the moon

If you studied the subject you would find that was not the case. You are expecting the same sort of reaction that we have here on Earth. First the force of gravity is six times higher here which would mean one would need six times the thrust here, second there is no atmosphere on the Moon. There was soil displacement You should check out Moonbase Clavius. Here is a link to this sort of charge:

Clavius: Gravity - dust

 

[d taylor]

What are your actual beliefs about the moon? Do you believe it to be lit from the inside or something of that sort? What do you think the lighter and darker patches are? I'm just asking out of curiosity.

From what i can see from photos i have taken.
Light is emitted out of the impressions on the surface (i see that) but the whole surface could easily produce light. It does not matter which direction the moon has turned, the light coming from these impressions, always goes the same direction. In other word the light never changes.

During the day i have seen when the moon is close to the sun. Where sunlight is striking the moon and that part of the moon looks (is lit different) different than the other parts that are lit.

I do not spend a lot of time on this just occasionally, i do notice when the moon is over head. I can record and take photos and the closer distance makes a difference in the photos. As compared to if the moon is lower toward the horizon and farther away.

 

[Subduction Zone]

From what i can see from photos i have taken.
Light is emitted out of the impressions on the surface (i see that) but the whole surface could easily produce light. It does not matter which direction the moon has turned, the light coming from these impressions, always goes the same direction. In other word the light never changes.

During the day i have seen when the moon is close to the sun. Where sunlight is striking the moon and that part of the moon looks (is lit different) different than the other parts that are lit.

I do not spend a lot of time on this just occasionally, i do notice when the moon is over head. I can record and take photos and the closer distance makes a difference in the photos. As compared to if the moon is lower toward the horizon and farther away.

The difference in distance from you to the Moon varies more due to irregularities in its orbit than the small distance of the radius of the Earth:

"The moon's orbit around Earth is elliptical. At perigee — its closest approach — the moon comes as close as 225,623 miles (363,104 kilometers). At apogee — the farthest away it gets — the moon is 252,088 miles (405,696 km) from Earth. On average, the distance from Earth to the moon is about 238,855 miles (384,400 km)."

How Far is the Moon?

Why would you think that the Moon is terribly different from the Earth? We were there after all. Fifty years ago today.

 

[Radagast]

From what i can see from photos i have taken.
Light is emitted out of the impressions on the surface (i see that)

What you saw was light being especially reflected off crater walls at the right angle.

 

[tas8831]

... but the whole surface could easily produce light.

Please provide your actual evidence and an explanation as to how this is so, and why it doesn't work during the phases of the moon.[/QUOTE]

 

[sjastro]

I don't usually participate in these sort of discussions but for those who think the moon is a source of its own light then explain why during a total eclipse of the Sun the sky becomes very dark and resembles a nighttime environment.