Moon light - the word of God vs falsely so called science

[Subduction Zone]

Maybe the water had fluoride?

Maybe the planets didn't align?

As a programmer myself, this is based on ONE VARIABLE. ONE VARIABLE. You mean these pathetic programmers of NASA didn't adjust for one VARIABLE??? BS, real programmers were busy working in the free market instead of fake BS NASA TV propoganda. You know, actually inventing real stuff.

You can read the struggles and battles of Commodore vs Intel for some context.

You did not pay attention. The difference in gravity is a huge "variable". It means that reaction time of the pilot would have to be on the order of a magnitude quicker to avoid a deadly failure. Also practice on the Earth where one could eject made it possible to fly with some confidence where ejection was not possible.

Tell me, have you ever driven a car on a dry country gravel road?

 

[morse86]

You did not pay attention. The difference in gravity is a huge "variable". It means that reaction time of the pilot would have to be on the order of a magnitude quicker to avoid a deadly failure. Also practice on the Earth where one could eject made it possible to fly with some confidence where ejection was not possible.

Tell me, have you ever driven a car on a dry country gravel road?

Do you understand how a computer works? The stock market has high frequency trading done by AI/computers that humans can't compete. It's "micro input" the computer would make and adjust according to realtime. Do you know how a car computer works and balances the fuel ratio? It's micro input. Heck, even plane engineers are thinking about putting it in case of certain types of failures where the "micro input" can adjust and fly/land vs human input.

That variable is can be adjusted easily BY even a 1950s computer, yes.

 

[d taylor]

Eleos literally said that the moon is a reflector, so why would you demand a model which does not allow the moon to be a reflector?

I will admit writing and communicating through the written word is not a strong area for me.

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.
But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

Moon

 

[Lost4words]

What does that have to do with producing light? Moon has phases but still produces light.

 

[Lost4words]

How do you know it's dust and rock? All you have is NASA's Telievision movie. Forget the fact they are still trying to get to the moon after losing the technology from Apollo. Forget the fact they are still trying to get through van allen radiation belts after doing so in apollo. Forget the fact that prius and tesla have decade battery life while voyager has been going almost 50 years with the same battery (and recharge).

I mean it's just ridiculous the people have become this gullible. I guess that's why the bible says many are deceived and it makes a distinction between REAL science and falsely so called $cience.

 

[A_Thinker]

What does that have to do with producing light? Moon has phases but still produces light.

Why isn't its light consistent ? Most sources of light are consistent.

 

[A_Thinker]

I will admit writing and communicating through the written word is not a strong area for me.

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.
But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

Moon
View attachment 259757

Spoons ...

 

[46AND2]

I will admit writing and communicating through the written word is not a strong area for me.

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.
But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

Moon
View attachment 259757

Um...You know there is nothing else around the moon to reflect light back to us, right?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you understand how a computer works? The stock market has high frequency trading done by AI/computers that humans can't compete. It's "micro input" the computer would make and adjust according to realtime. Do you know how a car computer works and balances the fuel ratio? It's micro input. Heck, even plane engineers are thinking about putting it in case of certain types of failures where the "micro input" can adjust and fly/land vs human input.

That variable is can be adjusted easily BY even a 1950s computer, yes.

You are mixing technology. It is not just the CPU that is necessary to make such decisions it is all of the sensors as well. I do not think that they had self piloting helicopters at that time and the LEM was much more complicated to fly.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why isn't its light consistent ? Most sources of light are consistent.

The Moon is not flat. The reflection off of a flat surface would depend upon percentage of surface reflecting only. But the Moon is a sphere.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I will admit writing and communicating through the written word is not a strong area for me.

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.
But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

Moon
View attachment 259757

I see that photography may confuse you. Our eyes tend to work on a logarithmic scale while photography is often linear. That results in only the brightest of objects showing up in a photograph while dimmer objects, such as stars when compared to the Moon, do not show up at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you understand how a computer works? The stock market has high frequency trading done by AI/computers that humans can't compete. It's "micro input" the computer would make and adjust according to realtime. Do you know how a car computer works and balances the fuel ratio? It's micro input. Heck, even plane engineers are thinking about putting it in case of certain types of failures where the "micro input" can adjust and fly/land vs human input.

That variable is can be adjusted easily BY even a 1950s computer, yes.

And besides making me doubt your knowledge of computers you also dodged a more than reasonable question. Perhaps the reason for the dodge is that you know that this sort of special effect was not possible in 1974, watch the fine dust come off of the wheels. The only environment where this could happen is in a vacuum, like the vacuum found on the Moon:

 

[Kylie]

I did not ask for a model that would not allow the moon to reflect.

Yes you did:

"Oh and also do not show any light from the sun, lighting the moon, the moon should just shine in the room as if it is a light source itself."​

I ask for this person to produce a model that shows an object (representing the moon) being lit up and reflecting light.

No you didn't.

But like is seen when i see the moon in real life. I would only want to see the light being reflected from the moon. The model should not have any of the light from the sun light, light source, lighting up any of the area around the object.

And now you are doing it again.

You are saying that you do not want to have a model in which the moon functions as a reflector.

In other words when this person is making their model and they are out in a field and they shine their light source on to the object representing the moon. Only the object should be lit up and reflecting light, non of the surrounding area where the object is located should show any light from the light source representing the sun, the only light to be shown should be the light coming from the object(moon).

The light from the sun still exists all around the moon. The reason we don't see anything being lit by it is because space is a vacuum and there is nothing there to be lit. Just the moon.

 

[d taylor]

I see that photography may confuse you. Our eyes tend to work on a logarithmic scale while photography is often linear. That results in only the brightest of objects showing up in a photograph while dimmer objects, such as stars when compared to the Moon, do not show up at all.

I only post photos because we are not out side looking in real life.

And that is why originally i stated that i would like to see this model in real life. because a photo does not represent reality very well especially light.

That is your advantage discussing this over a computer. And basically science's trickery, that really exist only on paper, computer model programs, and in the imagination of people who believe sciences lies.

 

[d taylor]

Um...You know there is nothing else around the moon to reflect light back to us, right?

I know the lie science states, that the moon is out in an non existent space vacuum.

When you or any body else has never see that in reality a moon, sun out in space or stars.

 

[d taylor]

Yes you did:

"Oh and also do not show any light from the sun, lighting the moon, the moon should just shine in the room as if it is a light source itself."​

No you didn't.



And now you are doing it again.

You are saying that you do not want to have a model in which the moon functions as a reflector.



The light from the sun still exists all around the moon. The reason we don't see anything being lit by it is because space is a vacuum and there is nothing there to be lit. Just the moon.

I know what i am asking do not tell me what i am asking

 

[Tone]

I heard the Chinese are established on the darkside...of the moon...of course...

 

[Radagast]

Prisuses don't use nuclear batteries.

Think of the mileage you would get!

 

[Kylie]

I know what i am asking do not tell me what i am asking

Well, what you write seems to be different to what you say you are writing...

 

[d taylor]

A simple fact is that i can post photos of the sun moon and stars in the raqia, where God place them.

But not a single real photo can be posted of the sun, moon and stars in, pagan sciences made up outer space.