Nothing you've said about Gentiles in Pentecost has any scriptural backing. If it doesn't say there were Gentiles there, then there weren't any Gentiles there. You cannot ASSUME otherwise. Concerning Gentiles at Pentecost, everything you said was an assumption. Standard protestant teaching incorrectly puts Gentiles everywhere in scripture, where, besides a few minor places, like with the woman at the well, the only places in scripture saved Gentiles truly exist in any numbers after Gen 11, are those few thousand (maybe) in Acts that were ALL grafted into Israel, starting with Cornelius, and the billions in the only true Gentile Church, Biblically, that started in Ac28:28 or 70AD - take your pick. As far as 2018 is concerned, I'm talking Protestant Church here. I'm still not sure that anyone that buys into the corrupt, non-Biblical Catholic doctrine is even saved. They believe in Jesus Christ, of course, but there are those non-Biblical salvation attachments that any Bible believer would be uncomfortable with.
Scripturally, it's well settled there were no Gentiles at Pentecost and the first Gentile in Acts was 8 years later. This pretty much destroys Darby's, Scofield's, and Larkin's Acts 2 dispensationalism. Not only was no Gentile church started in Acts 2, no truly Gentile Church was started until the very end of Acts. The fact that saved Gentiles during Acts were grafted into Israel and the fact that no one during Acts had a calling to be in Heaven pretty much wipes out mid-Acts dispensationalism. The Gentile church today started in Ac28:28, which is obvious to any true bible believer who rightly divides.
Those nations being Gentile nations is worthless information. Rome was Gentile but there were a lot of Jews there. Acts 2:5 is the clincher. Jews were in every country. There were ZERO Gentiles in Ac2 and ZERO Gentiles involved until Cornelius, 8 years later. Period.
Ac I could care less about Darby or Scofield, they did not write the Bible and like anyone else but Christ are subject to being wrong.
Acts 2 states their were Men from every nation.
You can clearly see the Gentiles being amazed at what was taking place.
Acts 2: 6. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? 8. And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? 9. Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10. Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, 11. Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
Notice Jews are mentioned singularly with other people.
You may not accept this but it is what it is, Jews were not in every nation nor were they the only people at Pentacost.
The Holy Ghost was poured out first on Jews, but others came to this great move of God.
The Gentiles were hearing the Jews speak in the Gentile native tongue.
Acts 2: 37. Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? 38. Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Verses 1 through 3 the Holy Ghost fell on the Jews.
Starting at verse 37 the witnesses that were onlookers repented and recieved the Holy Ghost.
The Gentile Churches were planted by Paul, but the Gospel and Holy Ghost were given by God.
There is only one Gospel, not two separated by race.
So even at the first Church founded by Peter their were Gentile people who had salvation.
If you don't believe me ask Paul here are his words:
Galatians 3: 28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
What don't you get from this statement?
Why is this hard to grasp?
God Bless You, I hope you know the Lord like I do.
You call me a protestant, I was never Catholic so I have no need to protest.
Last edited:
Upvote
0