- May 14, 2014
- 80
- 10
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
I have heard many people discuss the concept of a microchip in the hand being the mark of the beast.
I have started to really think about the whole concept, and I'm starting to question if this is just another thing that the church has gained a misunderstanding on. I look back in history and there are many things that the church has gotten wrong.
So, I look through the Scriptures on end times, and I see that there is a mark of the beast that is going to go either in the wrist or the forehead. I'm not sure where it came from, but many people automatically thought "mark of the beast" when it was suggested that the microchip is going to go in your wrist. What if I get one in my left hand? It would still function and not qualify for mark of the beast placement. What if the microchips have just been suggested to be put in the wrist for purpose of convenience on the user rather than a forced mark placement?
I guess I'm just wondering, why has it been assumed that the mark of the beast is going to be a microchip? When I think mark of the beast, I think of something like a barcode tattoo on the wrist/forehead, or a branding type mark. What are your thoughts? Why microchip?
I have started to really think about the whole concept, and I'm starting to question if this is just another thing that the church has gained a misunderstanding on. I look back in history and there are many things that the church has gotten wrong.
So, I look through the Scriptures on end times, and I see that there is a mark of the beast that is going to go either in the wrist or the forehead. I'm not sure where it came from, but many people automatically thought "mark of the beast" when it was suggested that the microchip is going to go in your wrist. What if I get one in my left hand? It would still function and not qualify for mark of the beast placement. What if the microchips have just been suggested to be put in the wrist for purpose of convenience on the user rather than a forced mark placement?
I guess I'm just wondering, why has it been assumed that the mark of the beast is going to be a microchip? When I think mark of the beast, I think of something like a barcode tattoo on the wrist/forehead, or a branding type mark. What are your thoughts? Why microchip?