Merrick Garland And Bidens DOJ Hard At Work To Stop Trump 2024, Trump Says He Received Target Letter In Federal January 6 Investigation

[RocksInMyHead]

The concerns are related to local school board meetings and not threats on the internet or by mail

The concerns are related to threats made against local school board officials. Some of those have been made in person, at school board meetings. Some of them have been communicated by vandalism. And some of them have been communicated by mail, telephone, or over the internet.

 

[Arcangl86]

The concerns are related to local school board meetings and not threats on the internet or by mail

You have a hard time dealing with the fact the parents were investigated by the FBI and labeled "Domestic Terroist", for actions taking place in "cities" at the local level across America

It's apparent you support and defend Biden and his mob boss in Merrick Garland, in their unlawful actions against concerned parents who are American citizens

Here's the memo that the DoJ issued. As you can see, there is no mention of school board meetings or domestic terrorism. Instead it is about general threats again educators and ordering that the FBI meet with state, local and tribal officials to coordinate response.

And actually, I don't particularly support Biden or AG Garland. Don't get me wrong, they are better then who came before, but I still think both of them are open to criticism. But I believe that these criticism need to be based on reality and not exaggerated talking points.

 

[Truth7t7]

some of them have been communicated by mail, telephone, or over the internet.

Please provide your source of threats made by mail or internet, with documents in support, waiting?

 

[Truth7t7]

ordering that the FBI meet with state, local and tribal officials to coordinate response.

No need or jurisdiction of the FBI over local officials, they have policing authority to charge, arrest, and prosecute at the local level if people violate the law

Merrick Garland used his office as a political weapon against concerned parents who are American Citizens, to "Silence Their Voices" its that simple

You can continue to write until your hands are cramped, it's not going to change the facts, the FBI has no jurisdiction over local school board meetings or the parents that attend them

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Please provide your source of threats made by mail or internet, with documents in support, waiting?

School Board President Says Threats Unjustified, FBI Will Be Alerted - LevittownNow.com

Mask mandates and other divisive issues created by the coronavirus pandemic and other societal realities have made it a very stressful time to be a school board member, Pennsbury board President Christine Toy-Dragoni said in laying out death and other threats made against her and fellow board...

levittownnow.com

Jennifer Jenkins, a school board official in Brevard County, Fla., said she had suffered months of threats, beginning last year when she unseated an incumbent member of her school board.

At first, Ms. Jenkins said, parents angered by the district’s transgender bathroom policy began to appear at board meetings, waving Trump flags and calling members “pedophiles.” But that soon escalated, she said, to angry groups of people shouting on the street outside her home.
Florida parents opposed to mask mandates in schools protested at a school board meeting in Brevard County, Fla., in August.

Then in July, after the district put in place a mask mandate for students, a Republican state lawmaker posted Ms. Jenkins’s cellphone number on his Facebook page, and her voice mail filled with hateful messages.

Source

School boards get death threats over race, gender, mask policies

Local school officials across the United States are being inundated with threats of violence and other hostile messages from anonymous harassers nationwide, fueled by rage over culture-war issues.

www.reuters.com

 

[Arcangl86]

No need or jurisdiction of the FBI over local officials, they have policing authority to charge, arrest, and prosecute at the local level if people violate the law

Merrick Garland used his office as a political weapon against concerned parents who are American Citizens, to "Silence Their Voices" its that simple

You can continue to write until your hands are cramped, it's not going to change the facts, the FBI has no jurisdiction over local school board meetings or the parents that attend them

Sending a threat via mail is a federal crime. Sending a threat via phone, is a federal crime. Sending a threat over the internet is, you guessed it, a federal crime. You are fixating on the actual school board meetings, but there are no references to that in the memo itself. Instead the memo speaks about threats in a more broad sense. Some of the threats the FBI can't do anything about and would be left to the local and state authorities. Some of them will involve interstate commerce or the mail, and thus will be something the FBI would deal with.

 

[Truth7t7]

Sending a threat via mail is a federal crime. Sending a threat via phone, is a federal crime. Sending a threat over the internet is, you guessed it, a federal crime. You are fixating on the actual school board meetings, but there are no references to that in the memo itself. Instead the memo speaks about threats in a more broad sense. Some of the threats the FBI can't do anything about and would be left to the local and state authorities. Some of them will involve interstate commerce or the mail, and thus will be something the FBI would deal with.

WashingtonExaminer
FBI opened multiple investigations into protesting parents, GOP lawmakers say
By
Jeremiah Poff, Education Reporter
May 12, 2022 10:19 AM

The representatives said the information shared by "brave whistle blowers" indicated that the FBI had opened investigations under a previously disclosed "threat tag" that categorized reported threats in "almost every region of the country and relating to all types of educational settings."

The letter cited three examples of incidents the FBI deemed worthy of an investigation.

In one example, the FBI interviewed a mother who had told her school board, "We're coming for you," after a tip told the FBI she was a threat due to her membership in the parent activist organization Moms for Liberty and because she owned a gun.

In another case, the FBI interviewed someone who had filed a tip alleging that a father who opposed mask mandates in schools "fit the profile of an insurrectionist" and likewise owned guns. The individual who filed the tip admitted under questioning that "they had 'no specific information or observations of ... any crime threats.'"

The final example cited by Jordan and Johnson was an FBI field office that opened an investigation into Republican elected officials in a state after a Democratic Party official filed a tip claiming that the Republicans had "incited violence" by "expressing displeasure with school districts' vaccine mandates."

 

[Gene2memE]

WashingtonExaminer
FBI opened multiple investigations into protesting parents, GOP lawmakers say
...

The FBI opened investigations into individuals because they received information from the public that these individuals might be making threats to others and inclined to cause harm. Seems normal. I would expect that such things happen every day. After-all, it's called the Federal Bureau of Investigations for a reason, right?

Are you making the case that the FBI should not investigated tips from the public? Or are you making a case that the FBI make exceptions in the interviews/investigations for parents, Republican law makers and anti-mask/anti-vax individuals? Do you think that the FBI should be free to act on information it receives and then make its own determinations? Even if the initial tip is politically motivated?


Oh, and that woman that said "We're coming for you,". Here's the full quote:

“We’re coming for you. Take it as a threat. Call the FBI. I don’t care. You’re all either going to be recalled or you’re all — we’re all coming for you. That’s what’s happening.”​

​

That's about as close to a death threat as you can get without saying it directly. If I was a member of a school board and someone with access to firearms said that to me, I'd feel fine calling in the police to ask a few questions of her.

In another case, the adult child of a member of a different school board had this sent to their home (prompting the FBI to open an investigation):

“It is too bad that your mother is an ugly communist [word meaning female prostitute]. If she doesn’t quit or resign before the end of the year, we will kill her, but first, we will kill you!”​

​

Another 22 individual death-threats were sent to members of that particular school board.

In yet another case, a school board member received threatening letters for more than a year. One evening, they came home to find their dogs had been poisoned. Guess what - the FBI opened an investigation into that as well.

 

[NxNW]

If parents were/are in violation of local/state laws they will be charged and dealt with locally

The FBI has no jurisdiction in local school board concerns, parents aren't domestic terroist

It's apparent you support Biden and his mob boss in Merrick Garland, in their unlawful actions against concerned parents who are American citizens

What mob?

What unlawful actions? Has any court made any such determination?

 

[Truth7t7]

The FBI opened investigations into individuals because they received information from the public that these individuals might be making threats to others and inclined to cause harm. Seems normal. I would expect that such things happen every day. After-all, it's called the Federal Bureau of Investigations for a reason, right?

Are you making the case that the FBI should not investigated tips from the public? Or are you making a case that the FBI make exceptions in the interviews/investigations for parents, Republican law makers and anti-mask/anti-vax individuals? Do you think that the FBI should be free to act on information it receives and then make its own determinations? Even if the initial tip is politically motivated?


Oh, and that woman that said "We're coming for you,". Here's the full quote:

“We’re coming for you. Take it as a threat. Call the FBI. I don’t care. You’re all either going to be recalled or you’re all — we’re all coming for you. That’s what’s happening.”​

​

That's about as close to a death threat as you can get without saying it directly. If I was a member of a school board and someone with access to firearms said that to me, I'd feel fine calling in the police to ask a few questions of her.

In another case, the adult child of a member of a different school board had this sent to their home (prompting the FBI to open an investigation):

“It is too bad that your mother is an ugly communist [word meaning female prostitute]. If she doesn’t quit or resign before the end of the year, we will kill her, but first, we will kill you!”​

​

Another 22 individual death-threats were sent to members of that particular school board.

In yet another case, a school board member received threatening letters for more than a year. One evening, they came home to find their dogs had been poisoned. Guess what - the FBI opened an investigation into that as well.

"Local Authorities" that are appointed by or are elected by the people in their jurisdiction

The FBI should hand over supposed claims as these to the "local authorities", and yes they were false claims made upon assumptions

The federal government in the FBI has no business in handling a local criminal claim, that a guy has a gun and could be a threat to whoever

Yes it was (Merrick Garland) Joe Bidens hand picked mob boss, who was behind the actions of the federal government and his FBI

 

[Arcangl86]

The FBI should hand over supposed claims as these to the "local authorities", and yes they were false claims made upon assumptions

Uh, they did. Somebody tipped them off, they did an initial investigation and then handed off the cases.

 

[Truth7t7]

Uh, they did. Somebody tipped them off, they did an initial investigation and then handed off the cases.

Once again, the "Federal FBI" isn't in the business of "investigating matters within Local Authorities Jurisdiction", where the local government is elected by the people within its jurisdiction, local counties, cities, etc

If a crime is reported to the federal FBI (a man has a gun and we think he's dangerous)?

It's turned "immediately" over to the local authorities "without FBI investigation", it's the local authorities responsibility to investigate, charge, and prosecute

 

[Arcangl86]

Once again, the "Federal FBI" isn't in the business of "investigating matters within Local Authorities Jurisdiction", where the local government is elected by the people within its jurisdiction, local counties, cities, etc

If a crime is reported to the federal FBI (a man has a gun and we think he's dangerous)?

It's turned "immediately" over to the local authorities "without FBI investigation", it's the local authorities responsibility to investigate, charge, and prosecute

How is the FBI supposed to know if a federal crime hasn't been committed without a preliminary investigation?