I am having the probably one of the biggest faith shakers of the my walk with the Lord yet with this verse. I've read so many articles about the different views of this discourse but I am not convince by any of them. To Preterists, Jesus return was in 70 A.D. and that the Abomination of Desolation (AoD) was Antiochus Epiphanes, the warning to the Christians to flee to the mountains as an early warning sign to flee the judgement to come on Jerusalem and whatnot rather than Jesus' final coming in which no one will be able to flee. On the surface, it seems to make sense right? Nero/Antiochus, as the Anti-Christ and the AoD, the ability to avoid this catastrophe, the coming of phony Messiahs, and "no stone left atop another". But then I look at verse 29 where Jesus says that IMMEDIATELY after the tribulation, that He will be seen coming on the clouds and that the whole EARTH will mourn and He will gather all of His saints from the corners of the WORLD, not Judea. And then he says that this generation will not pass away until these things happen! First, I've heard the Preterist argument that verse 29-31 is figurative taken from Daniel 7, Isaiah 13, and Ezekiel but the fact that he says that he will gather his elect from all corners of the earth seems to be unarguably literal as I also have heard that meaning "to preach the gospel" to all corners of the earth which frankly, I want to buy but I don't. Even the following verses about no one knowing the day or hour except the Father and the FINAL judgement throws me in for a loop! Goodness gracious this is troubling me. I can't believe that this verse can mean that Jesus return was at 70 A.D. but I also can't believe that He hasn't already returned in 70 A.D.! Please, those of you who have wrestled with the verse but have been given understanding by God, shed your light on this! I've been praying that God would give me a sufficient answer but none have been shown to me yet.
Scholars of the Greek text of Matthew’s gospel have studied the Olivet discourse in very great detail. Popular pastors and Bible teachers have done far too much talking and very little studying because they get paid for talking but not for studying. Very detailed recent commentaries on the Geek text of Matthew’s gospel include the commentaries by Donald A. Hagner (two volumes, 1993, 1995), John Nolland, 2005 (John Nolland is also the author of a three-volume commentary on Luke’s gospel, 1989, 1993, 1993), and R. T. France, 2007. Each one of these theologically conservative commentaries contains over 1,000 pages of information compiled from hundreds of published studies on all or part of Matthew’s gospel. Noland’s commentary contains 1,579 pages of information and would serve as a very good starting place for the study of Matthew’s gospel and the Olivet discourse in particular.
Upvote
0