Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why would He? should He fulfill the erroneous expectations of scientists too (Matthew 4)?Jesus didn't fulfill the erroneous expectations of a Jewish Messiah.
Truncated Scripture.Colter said:The Jews have scripture based reasons that they rejected him,
Mainly Jews and scientists would consider that a danger.Colter said:... hence the danger of calling the writings of man the Word of God.
Does that include the anonymously-written Chicago-based UB ... written circa 1924?Colter said:The written word is invariably human and limited.
Yes, and had you read the book that you disagree with, you would know what it is that you disagree with.Why would He? should He fulfill the erroneous expectation of scientists too (Matthew 4)?Truncated Scripture.
Jesus fulfilled 109 of 333 prophecies, and He will fulfill the remaining 209 at His second coming.
In addition, the Jews and scientists don't believe the New Testament is the word of God.Mainly Jews and scientists would consider that a danger.
1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.Does that include the anonymously-written Chicago-based UB ... written circa 1924?
Jesus was not forced to do anything against His will.Jesus was forced into many of the so called prophecies by his Jewish followers ...
Jesus was not forced to do anything against His will.
I understand where you're coming from here, but let's set this record straight, shall we?He wished for the cross sacrifice to pass over him so he didn't have to.
Forced as in, his followers interpreted OT prophecies to apply to Jesus. There was enough there to lead people to expect the coming of a "deliverer", and had they interpreted those teachings spiritually instead of a material kingdom with a Messiah-king to sit in David's seat, then they would have been better prepared. But the fact is he didn't, he left and has been gone 2000 years. That wasn't in the expectations of the Jewish Messiah.Jesus was not forced to do anything against His will.
The cross wasn't a sacrifice, it was an experiential requirement for the incarnation. He lived the life and experienced the death of one of his own created beings. Had the Jews accepted Jesus' original gospel, he would have simply relinquished his material body and left. But that was unlikely to happen as religious minds can be so stubborn and cruel.He wished for the cross sacrifice to pass over him so he didn't have to.
Are you bragging or complaining, Colter?Forced as in, his followers interpreted OT prophecies to apply to Jesus. There was enough there to lead people to expect the coming of a "deliverer", and had they interpreted those teachings spiritually instead of a material kingdom with a Messiah-king to sit in David's seat, then they would have been better prepared. But the fact is he didn't, he left and has been gone 2000 years. That wasn't in the expectations of the Jewish Messiah.
It was just a simple case of stumbling over their own preconceived ideas. Jesus warned us not the put the new wine into the old wineskins. Basically we were to forget what we thought we knew and start over, to trust him like unspoiled children. The Messiah of the Jews (based on their own competing expectations) will never come nor will Jesus return to smash up the world and dip people in a lake of fire, put away Satan, get him back out again etc.Are you bragging or complaining, Colter?
For the record, the Jews couldn't reconcile the Psalm 72/Isaiah 11 depiction of the Messiah with the Psalm 22/Isaiah 53 depiction of the Messiah, so they concluded that there were two Messiah's coming: one weak and the other strong.
When Jesus presented His credentials as the Psalm 22/Isaiah 53 Messiah, they said, "Away with Him!"
Again, let me point this out:
The Dispensation of Grace, a period of time between the dispensations of Law & Kingdom, was unknown even to the angels.
It started when the veil of the temple was rent in twain and will end at Armageddon.
All you're doing is using their oversight to try and make some valid point against God's timeline.
And yes, it's hard to call it an "oversight," when even the angels didn't know about it; but what's their excuse now?
Satan would love that to be true.The Messiah of the Jews (based on their own competing expectations) will never come nor will Jesus return to smash up the world and dip people in a lake of fire, put away Satan, get him back out again etc.
Satan is gone and Tyre is still there. Prophecy invalidated!Satan would love that to be true.
That would then leave 209 prophecies unfulfilled, one of which is that all Israel will be saved, when they look on Him whom they have pierced.
Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Someone once asked what keeps Satan going, even though he knows the Scriptures better than anyone; and the answer is a good one:
All he has to do is get ONE SINGLE PROPHECY to fail or be left unfulfilled (let alone 209), and he wins.
And that Israel prophecy is doosey of a prophecy.
This is wishful thinking among the worldly educated.Satan is gone and Tyre us still there. Prophecy invalidated!
Not at all. They knew Who they were killing. If they were blind they would have no sin.Jesus didn't fulfill the erroneous expectations of a Jewish Messiah. The Jews have scripture based reasons that they rejected him,
If we know Jesus is God, and He gave us His words, then right there we know they are the word of God!hence the danger of calling the writings of man the Word of God. The written word is invariably human and limited.
2 Peter: "Know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God" (1:20-21).His words would be the word of God.
That's a mans opinion and obveously wrong, the scripture books are full of contradictions and errors.2 Peter: "Know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God" (1:20-21).
How about the prophets like Isaiah that Jesus quoted? Are they just men who were wrong too? By the way if Peter was wrong, and Jesus had promised to send the spirit to him so that he would remember it to write it down, would that make Jesus wrong too?That's a mans opinion and obveously wrong, the scripture books are full of contradictions and errors.
That's a good and fair question. Jesus quoted what was true and representative of his identity and teachings. I quote truths from the Bible when it serves a purpose, I don't quote what I think is untrue.How about the prophets like Isaiah that Jesus quoted? Are they just men who were wrong too? By the way if Peter was wrong, and Jesus had promised to send the spirit to him so that he would remember it to write it down, would that make Jesus wrong too?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?