evange said:Um... what?
Obedience.
Obeying The God.
Obedience to The God that has revealed in The Qur'aan withregards to dress code.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
evange said:Um... what?
Bookofknowledge said:Obedience.
Obeying The God.
Obedience to The God that has revealed in The Qur'aan withregards to dress code.
To defend it, one has to suspend the mind and simply submitmsindiausa said:It doesn't. Athra usually defends Islam by pointing out faults in other cultures. Can't blame him; Islam is a hard religion to defend.
Montalban said:To defend it, one has to suspend the mind and simply submit
evange said:so do you think that logical thought can be considered sinful in islam because it is wrong to do anything other than submit without question?
What do the muslims think about this?
I'm basing this on the 'let's have every argument at once' style.evange said:so do you think that logical thought can be considered sinful in islam because it is wrong to do anything other than submit without question?
In light of the topic at hand (i.e. non-thinking), that would be a redundant questionevange said:What do the muslims think about this?
Montalban said:In light of the topic at hand (i.e. non-thinking), that would be a redundant question
And also if this really is from al-lah then he believes men can't control their lusts - and if this is so, there'd be 1,000s of rapes by Muslim men in western nations where there's more temptations.evange said:But if "allah" gave us that specific dress code to stop men from lusting, then we'd have to assume that there is only one way to be modest, the way perscribed in the koran. But modesty is culturally relative, thus what the koran perscribes is not universally aplicable.
whitneysyed said:I think the topic in question is invalid as lust does not equal more rapes. Yes it's more likely for a man to lust over a woman scantily clad than over a woman who is covered, plain and simple. The rape analogy is not a good one. This is not a topic non-existant in judaism or christianity and the conclusion regaurding attire and lust is essentially the same in islam and christianity. King David committed murder because of his lust, so I find the quran quite reasonable in this respect.
Montalban said:Then why aren't Muslim men assaulting more women in the west? They should be - if al-lah is to be believed - unable to control their desires.
Also, Islam assumes that men have stronger sexual desires than do women. It's quite sexist on that account too.
Yes there's countless examples from Pakistan and other great Islamic nations where women who are raped have a difficult time getting convictions - she needs 4 witnesses according to some experts in Islamic lawmsindiausa said:Because unlike in Muslim countries, men who rape women in the west are considered evil. That is why they control their lust in our countries.
Much of the idea of sex in Islam is about women serving the needs of men.msindiausa said:And yes, women mos def have sexual desires. I guess all mighty Allah forgot that when he revealled the koran to Mohammed.
Doctrine1st said:So basically there are some areas in Islam that have not quite evolved like Judeo-Christianity; who used to have the same laws and cultural inequities.
Really? Where did Jesus teach to fight non-believers and slay idolators?Doctrine1st said:So basically there are some areas in Islam that have not quite evolved like Judeo-Christianity; who used to have the same laws and cultural inequities.
Read the OT specially Numbers 31. There are many cases where God tells his followers to smite many unbelievers. In addition it's full of misoginist treatment of women. So one more time, they used to treat women basically the same, some segments of religion have evolved, and everytime you see some that haven't, it's usually fortified by holding up some book with antiquated teachings. Why is that?Montalban said:Really? Where did Jesus teach to fight non-believers and slay idolators?
Where did Jesus teach it was okay to have sex with children?
Where did Jesus demand that women obey the sexual appetites of their husbands, and also say that hell is over-populated by women?
Thanks in advance.
Doctrine1st said:So basically there are some areas in Islam that have not quite evolved like Judeo-Christianity; who used to have the same laws and cultural inequities.
I asked you where did Jesus teach these things.Doctrine1st said:Read the OT specially Numbers 31. There are many cases where God tells his followers to smite many unbelievers. In addition it's full of misoginist treatment of women. So one more time, they used to treat women basically the same, some segments of religion have evolved, and everytime you see some that haven't, it's usually fortified by holding up some book with antiquated teachings. Why is that?
It's amazing so many people quote from the OT as if it's an example for all time.evange said:islamic culture has not progressed because the koran is stoping it.
Judeo-Christian has progressed, becuase the sciptures have allowed (and possibly encouraged) it to.
The koran limits culture, whereas culture is the only limit on the Bible.
I have always been told that there is a trinity.Montalban said:I asked you where did Jesus teach these things.
Get back to me when you can answer the question I ask, not one you think I've asked.