• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Lusting

evange

Eu amo anchova
Nov 15, 2005
1,035
39
london
Visit site
✟23,932.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Doctrine1st said:
Read the OT specially Numbers 31. There are many cases where God tells his followers to smite many unbelievers. In addition it's full of misoginist treatment of women. So one more time, they used to treat women basically the same, some segments of religion have evolved, and everytime you see some that haven't, it's usually fortified by holding up some book with antiquated teachings. Why is that?


I read it. First off, it applies to a certain time and certain place only. It is the history of Isreal, not an open ended command to live by.

Secondly, God tells the Israelites to fight back in retaliation.

Thirdly, how is it misogomist treatment of women? if anything, it's the oposite. Moses was angry because the women were kept alive, instead of being treated as equally as the men, and being killed.
 
Upvote 0

evange

Eu amo anchova
Nov 15, 2005
1,035
39
london
Visit site
✟23,932.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Doctrine1st said:
I have always been told that there is a trinity.

Where the Father, Jesus, and the HS, are all one God. Where Jesus existed from the start with God as God. So if God is teaching to smite non followers, then Jesus is teaching these same things. They are after all one God.


God doesn't teach them to smite non-followers, he tells them to. There's a difference.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
evange said:
God doesn't teach them to smite non-followers, he tells them to. There's a difference.
From what I understand neither does Allah. I think the passage often cited is from a particular war, just like God does with the Midianites and a number of other people.
 
Upvote 0

evange

Eu amo anchova
Nov 15, 2005
1,035
39
london
Visit site
✟23,932.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Doctrine1st said:
From what I understand neither does Allah. I think the passage often cited is from a particular war, just like God does with the Midianites and a number of other people.

Ok, fine, post one of the war mongering verses from the koran, and explain teh context.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
evange said:
Ok, fine, post one of the war mongering verses from the koran, and explain teh context.
This is the rules of engagement, the rules of war:

[2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those who attack you, but do not aggress. GOD does not love the aggressors.

[2:191] You may kill those who wage war against you, and you may evict them whence they evicted you. Oppression is worse than murder. Do not fight them at the Sacred Masjid, unless they attack you therein. If they attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those disbelievers.

[2:192] If they refrain, then GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

Just like the Bible, I think it important to understand these are not mandates from God, but rather men justifying their actions or their right to action through their idea of God.

I for one do not believe that any God would have people after smiting the men, go back and smite the children and non virgins, however, back then this what man did. What better way to justify their actions than to invoke God.

Or you can look at it this way. If you truly think it's the Muslims duty to kill infidels, then with about 1.6 billion, there seem to be a rather large large number of Muslims not following their Koran. Or it could be that other religions are purposely misrepresenting their faith, just like I just did in the last couple of posts about the Bible.

When Christians stop doing it, I'll stop doing it. :)
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Muhammed spends much time talking of hate and war and violence.
"As for those who are slain in the cause of God, He will not allow their works to perish. ... He will admit them to the Paradise He has made known to them." (47:8)

"Let those who would exchange the life of this world for the hereafter, fight for the cause of God; whether he dies or triumphs, We shall richly reward him. ... The true believers fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for the devil. Fight then against the friends of Satan ..." (4:74,76)
"The believers who stay at home (apart from those that suffer a grave impediment) are not the equals of those who fight for the cause of God with their goods and their persons. God has given those that fight with their goods and their persons a higher rank than those who stay at home ..." (4:95,96)
"Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. ... lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way ..." (9:5)
"Those that make war against God and His apostle and spread disorder in the land shall be put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the land. They shall be held up to shame in this world and sternly punished in the hereafter: except those that repent before you reduce them ..." (5:34,35)
"Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God’s religion shall reign supreme" (8:39)
"Prophet, rouse the faithful to arms. If there are twenty steadfast men among you, they shall vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, they shall rout a thousand unbelievers, for they are devoid of understanding." (8:65)
"Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given ... and do not embrace the true Faith, until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (9:29)
"Allah's Apostle (Muhammed) said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords.'"
(Hadith, Sahih Bukhari 4:52:73)
"Allah's Apostle (Muhammed) said, 'The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'"
(Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177)
"The Prophet (Muhammed) said: 'When the slave runs away from his master, his prayer is not accepted; he is an infidel.'"
(Hadith No. Muslim 32)
"The Prophet (Muhammed) said: 'Then go to the persons who do not join the congregational prayer and order their homes to be burnt...'"
(Hadith No. Muslim 234)
"Narrated 'Abdullah: Allah's Apostle (Muhammed) said, 'The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims.'"
(Hadith, Sahih Bukhari 9:83:17)
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Doctrine1st said:
Or you can look at it this way. If you truly think it's the Muslims duty to kill infidels, then with about 1.6 billion, there seem to be a rather large large number of Muslims not following their Koran.
This is true. Most people just want to live a life in peace and also most people aren't really that well versed in the tenets of their own faith.
Doctrine1st said:
Or it could be that other religions are purposely misrepresenting their faith, just like I just did in the last couple of posts about the Bible.

When Christians stop doing it, I'll stop doing it.

That's not the same; you've taken Christian texts out of context and believe you're doing the same thing as when people cite Muhammed.

I've asked you several times to quote the words of Jesus. You don't and therefore make an error you accuse others of doing.

Jesus dd not oversee the killing of PoWs. Muhammed did. If you can contextualise an argument, you'd be on a winner. Here's how...

Killing PoWs
Primary sources for the treatment of PoWs

"And He has caused to descend from their strongholds the Jews that assisted them. And he struck terror into their hearts. Some you slaughtered and some you took prisoner"
Sura 33.25

"Bani An-Nadir and Bani Quraiza fought, so the Prophet (Muhammad) exiled Bani An-Nadir and allowed Bani Quraiza to remain at their places. He then killed their men and distributed their women, children and property among the Muslims, but some of them came to the Prophet and he granted them safety, and they embraced Islam. He exiled all the Jews from Medina. They were the Jews of Bani Qainuqa', the tribe of 'Abdullah bin Salam and the Jews of Bani Haritha and all the other Jews of Medina."
(Hadith, Sahih Bukhari 5:59:362)

Surah Muhammad
47.4 So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islam), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allah to continue in carrying out Jihad against the disbelievers till they embrace Islam (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost,
http://www.quraan.com/index.aspx?tabindex=1&tabid=27&bid=47

Secondary source for the killing of PoWs
"The members of the last surviving Jewish tribe in Medinah, Banu Qurayzah, were even less fortunate. Muhammad offered the men conversion to Islam as an alternative to death; upon their refusal, all 900 were decapitated in front of their enslaved women and children. The women were subsequently raped; Muhammad chose as his concubine one Raihana Bint Amr, whose father and husband were both slaughtered before her eyes only hours earlier."
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/February1999/0299Trifkovic.htm

There were, in the time of Muhammad, Arab tribes that were Christian. Some were pagan, and some were Jewish. One such Jewish tribe, the Banu Quarayza helped Muhammad in battle. However, "their loyalty was questioned and inevitably, after the siege, Muhammad moved against them. Realizing that they had no chance of surviving, the Banu Quarayza agreed to surrender on condition that they quit Medina empty-handed. Muhammad refused and wanted nothing less than unconditional surrender. The Jews then appealed to their ancient friendship with the Banu Aws and asked that Abuy Lubaba, an ally belonging to that tribe, be allowed to visit them. He was asked what Muhammad's intentions were; by way of reply Abu Lubaba drew his hand across his throat, indicating that they must fight to the end, as death was all that they could hope for. At last, after several weeks, the Jews surrendered on condition that their fate should be decided by their allies, the Banu Aws. The latter were inclined to show mercy but Muhammad decided that the fate of the Jews was to be decided by on of the Banu Aws. Muhammad nominated Sa'd ibn Muadh to be the judge...He pronounced, "My judgement is that the men shall be put to death, the women and children sold into slavery, and the spoil divided among the army." Muhammad adopted the verdict as his own: "Truly the judgment of Sad is the judgment of God pronounced on high from beyond the seventh heaven."
During the night trenches sufficient to contain the dead bodies of the men were dug across the market place...In the morning, (Muhammad), himself a spectator of the tragedy, commanded the male captives to be brought forth in companies of five or six at a time. Each company as it came up was made to sit down in a row on the brink of the trench... The butchery began in the morning, and lasted all day...(Muhammad) returned from this horrid spectacle to solace himself with the charms of Rihana, who's husband and all of her make relatives had just perished in the massacre"*
"And yes, a revelation came down from heaven justifying the stern punishment meted out to the Jews: sura 32.25 (see above)

*Muir, Sir W (1923) "The Life of Muhammad", p240 quoted in:
Ibn Warraq (1995) "Why I am Not a Muslim", pp95-96.

All the males of the tribe were asked to show their pubic region. Those who had not developed pubic hair were considered children and were not killed. All in all - at a most conservative figure - some 900 prisoners-of-war were put to death at that instance.

Now Sa'd Ibn Mu'ath (RA) delivered his judgment: "I enjoin that all the men of Banu Quraithah be put to death and their wives and children be treated like prisoners of war while their wealth and properties be divided among the Muslims." Following this judgment Banu Quraithah were ordered to come out of the fort and they were all brought to Al-Madinah in custody. At last, following the judgment, their men were killed and their dwellings were given to the Muslims.
From: The History of Islam, Vol.1
http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/archive/readArt.php?id=37137&lang=E
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
evange said:
Ok, fine, post one of the war mongering verses from the koran, and explain teh context.
He's not interested in context. Anyone can quote mine. I did it earlier. Then I contextualised it by showing what Muhammed did. He oversaw the butchery of PoWs -that is, people NO LONGER a threat
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
This is true. Most people just want to live a life in peace and also most people aren't really that well versed in the tenets of their own faith.
Or when they read it, they read it context.
That's not the same; you've taken Christian texts out of context and believe you're doing the same thing as when people cite Muhammed.
Not sure what you mean here. I said I am taking the OT out of context on purpose for a point; Christians likewise take the Koran out of context on purpose.

Look, the proof is in the pudding. The only people who are going around in the Muslim world like nuts are those fanatics misusing the Koran and taking advantage of it's followers in the same manner Christians have done in the past with Christians.

I've asked you several times to quote the words of Jesus. You don't and therefore make an error you accuse others of doing.
You asked once, and I provided this:

I have always been told that there is a trinity.

Where the Father, Jesus, and the HS, are all one God. Where Jesus existed from the start with God as God. So if God is teaching to smite non followers, then Jesus is teaching these same things. They are after all one God.

Jesus dd not oversee the killing of PoWs. Muhammed did. If you can contextualise an argument, you'd be on a winner. Here's how...
According to the Bible, the God of the OT which is Jesus if he is part of the trinity told them to only take virgin prisoners, and not take other POWs but to smite them all; women and children. How is that better? How is that the upper hand of morality?
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
He's not interested in context. Anyone can quote mine. I did it earlier. Then I contextualised it by showing what Muhammed did. He oversaw the butchery of PoWs -that is, people NO LONGER a threat
Rude thing to say specially since I provided verses in context just as asked, and context is what I have been harping on.

What is more funny is that is the whole point of my posts "Anyone can quote mine"
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Doctrine1st said:
Rude thing to say specially since I provided verses in context just as asked, and context is what I have been harping on.
I asked for you to cite the teachings of Jesus and you go on about OT quotes out of any context.
Doctrine1st said:
What is more funny is that is the whole point of my posts "Anyone can quote mine"
I know. That's all you've done. It's hysterical.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Doctrine1st said:
I have always been told that there is a trinity.

Where the Father, Jesus, and the HS, are all one God. Where Jesus existed from the start with God as God. So if God is teaching to smite non followers, then Jesus is teaching these same things. They are after all one God.

According to the Bible, the God of the OT which is Jesus if he is part of the trinity told them to only take virgin prisoners, and not take other POWs but to smite them all; women and children. How is that better? How is that the upper hand of morality?
This is false reasoning. I make no apology for the things in the OT and do agree that they can be compared to some extent to the Koran.

However the things Jesus taught that are for all time are in the NT. If you find any of these teachings, please forward them. At best you're trying a strawman based on misrepresenting what happened in the OT.

For instance, in the OT it says not to eat pork. We do though because Christian understanding of what happened in the OT is NOT that it's an example for all time WHEREAS the Isalmic ideas of Muhammed are that he is.

So, get back to me when you've actually researched this.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
I asked for you to cite the teachings of Jesus and you go on about OT quotes out of any context.

I know. That's all you've done. It's hysterical.
You can't extract the teachings of Yahweh from the teachings of Jesus there Marcion.

If they are of the same substance they are the same entity. Crazy idea isn't it?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Doctrine1st said:
You can't extract the teachings of Yahweh from the teachings of Jesus there Marcion.

If they are of the same substance they are the same entity. Crazy idea isn't it?
I've just explained the Christian view.

What happened in the OT was for those times. If they weren't we'd still be praying on Saturday, not eating pork, and yes, probably burning down the houses of non-believers.

However Jesus came to show us was was 'ideal' and this is in the NT. So given that you are trying to tell Chrisitans what they should be following and argue against that, your argument is straw-man at best.

The Islamic view about Muhammed though is that he still remains the example for all time... there is no "NT" of the Koran.

So you avoiding the argument by relying on straw-man seems to be the way you wish to continue.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
This is false reasoning. I make no apology for the things in the OT and do agree that they can be compared to some extent to the Koran.
All right, headway!

However the things Jesus taught that are for all time are in the NT. If you find any of these teachings, please forward them. At best you're trying a strawman based on misrepresenting what happened in the OT.
Hey, just using Christian trinity logic.

For instance, in the OT it says not to eat pork. We do though because Christian understanding of what happened in the OT is NOT that it's an example for all time WHEREAS the Isalmic ideas of Muhammed are that he is.
No it's because, and one more time, all religions pick and choose what verses they wish to emphasize depending on the occassion. This is nothing new and continues. I stated in one of these threads that Islam should evolve beyond it's codes such as Sharia law, just like Jude-Christianity did.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Montalban said:
However the things Jesus taught that are for all time are in the NT. If you find any of these teachings, please forward them. At best you're trying a strawman based on misrepresenting what happened in the OT.

Doctrine1st said:
Hey, just using Christian trinity logic.
No, you're not. Your applying your own interpretation to what Christians believe. I keep stating you're wrong, you keep up that you're right. And then you argue from that straw-man, despite the examples I gave you where the OT doesn't count.

But, you will keep doing this because it's a lot easier than actually addressing what Christians believe.

Montalban said:
For instance, in the OT it says not to eat pork. We do though because Christian understanding of what happened in the OT is NOT that it's an example for all time WHEREAS the Isalmic ideas of Muhammed are that he is.

Doctrine1st said:
No it's because, and one more time, all religions pick and choose what verses they wish to emphasize depending on the occassion. This is nothing new and continues. I stated in one of these threads that Islam should evolve beyond it's codes such as Sharia law, just like Jude-Christianity did.[/quopte]
Then you've resigned yourself to straw-man. I was willing to discuss things with you but if you're not willing to, then so be it, because you've in effect denied people of a particular faith to interpret their faith for themselves, if it's contrvenes the straw-man you wish to dissect.

You can continue this, if you wish. I will try to get back to the OP, or discuss this with people who actually can construct something more than straw-man.
:wave:
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
No, you're not. Your applying your own interpretation to what Christians believe. I keep stating you're wrong, you keep up that you're right. And then you argue from that straw-man, despite the examples I gave you where the OT doesn't count.

But, you will keep doing this because it's a lot easier than actually addressing what Christians believe.
They believe that Jesus existed as God, as part of the trinity from day one. But yet you disassiociate what God said, from what Jesus said. Not quite sure what you believe?

Then you've resigned yourself to straw-man. I was willing to discuss things with you but if you're not willing to, then so be it, because you've in effect denied people of a particular faith to interpret their faith for themselves, if it's contrvenes the straw-man you wish to dissect.

You can continue this, if you wish. I will try to get back to the OP, or discuss this with people who actually can construct something more than straw-man.
So you disaggree that religoins pick and chose what they want to believe? How many Christian denominations are there?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Doctrine1st said:
They believe that Jesus existed as God, as part of the trinity from day one. But yet you disassiociate what God said, from what Jesus said. Not quite sure what you believe?
Not sure you care.
Doctrine1st said:
So you disaggree that religoins pick and chose what they want to believe? How many Christian denominations are there?
What if Christianity did? You can't argue that Christianity should follow the 'example' of the OT, then say it can't disassociate Jesus' example from the Trinity, and then defend that Christianity picks and chooses.

You're very confused.

I've stated enough times you're working on what you think Christians believe, and what Moslems believe. You don't really care because despite several postings you just continue to do it.

If you want to construct an argument based upon the teachings of Christ (I suggested you look to the NT), you're more than welcome to do so - but no, you just want to continue to go back to the OT despite the fact I've stated several times what Christians believe on the matter; that certain examples were for that time.

I've never met any poster (outside Islam) who's so determined to cling to a straw-man in order to avoid actually bothering to construct an argument.

I don't have the patience anymore.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Montalban said:
Not sure you care.

What if Christianity did? You can't argue that Christianity should follow the 'example' of the OT, then say it can't disassociate Jesus' example from the Trinity, and then defend that Christianity picks and chooses.

You're very confused.

I've stated enough times you're working on what you think Christians believe, and what Moslems believe. You don't really care because despite several postings you just continue to do it.

If you want to construct an argument based upon the teachings of Christ (I suggested you look to the NT), you're more than welcome to do so - but no, you just want to continue to go back to the OT despite the fact I've stated several times what Christians believe on the matter; that certain examples were for that time.

I've never met any poster (outside Islam) who's so determined to cling to a straw-man in order to avoid actually bothering to construct an argument.

I don't have the patience anymore.
take care :wave:
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
As Doctine1st is determined at straw-man, I will look at the OP and try to bring this thread back.

Moslem men need to take responsibility for their own lusts.

Although not strictly speaking to do with 'lust' this article http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1528544.htm had bearing on the fact that Moslems do have problems with a different law structure here in Australia
 
Upvote 0