- Oct 28, 2006
- 24,173
- 11,262
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
She said enough to discern her trajectory, and it was clearly lopsided in interpretation.To you, I didn't think so, but to the YouTube uploader, it clearly was.
Part of the problem, is that her point hasn't been made yet when the video ends, nor has the full story in "Mark" about the woman from the long-destroyed city of Tyre been fully presented (the latter, as best I can tell).
mmmm.That seems to be the consensus position on the passage, but I don't have any particular position on that.
Sometimes, it only takes a sound bite to see where it's going.I don't think we got that far into the sermon.
Which gospels are those? I don't think I noticed a big difference.Different gospels have different perspective on the relationship of the new faith and Judiaism
The Shema essentially says---God comes first, then neighbor. There's a priority there.I don't know what "Shema" is and I am not a humanist so I don't know their philosophy about religion and politics, but as someone dedicated to secular government (religiously) I don't have any expectations that religion must be completely removed from politics. (The operation of government, yes, but that is a different issue.) My preference is that religious beliefs would not be part of human society, but I'm just going to have to stick to imagining that for now.
I leave settling that to those tied as such.
I guess I'll just wait for the Big Authority to come by who will tell me that Deontology must trump an Ethics of Care.
Upvote
0