I'd like to ask you to address the passages I referred to and then I'll respond to what you wrote above and the passage you're using.
2 Cor. 3:7-18
"Now if the ministry of death, carved in letters on stone, came with such glory that the Israelites could not gaze at Moses' face because of its glory, which was being brought to an end, will not the ministry of the Spirit have even more glory? For if there was glory in the ministry of condemnation, the ministry righteousness must far exceed it in glory.
Indeed, in this case, what once had glory has come to have no glory at all, because of the glory that surpasses it. For if what was being brought to an end came with glory, much more will what is permanent have glory.
Since we have such a hope, we are very bold, not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face so that the Israelites might not gaze at the outcome of what was being brought to an end. But their minds were hardened. For to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away.
Yes, to this day whenever Moses is read a veil lies over their hearts. But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit."
Observations:
- The ministry of death is carved in letters on stone.
- It came with glory and Israel could not gaze at Moses' face.
- It's glory was being brought to an end.
- The ministry of the Spirit has even more glory?
- There was glory in the ministry of condemnation.
- The ministry of righteousness far exceeds the ministry of condemnation.
- What once had glory has no glory at all, because of the glory that surpasses it.
- What once had glory was being brought to an end, even though it came with glory.
- The ministry of the Spirit and ministry of righteousness is permanent and has more glory.
- Moses put a veil over his face so that Israel couldn't see that the glory of the letters engraved on stone was being brought to an end.
- Their minds were hardened.
- To this day when they read the old covenant (letters engraved on stone) the veil remains.
- Only through Christ is the veil taken away.
- Whenever Moses is read a veil lies over their hearts.
- BUT in turning to the Lord, the veil is removed.
- The Lord is Spirit
- Where the Spirit of the Lord is, is also freedom.
- Once the veil is removed we behold the glory of the Lord and are being transformed into the same image.
- This comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.
It is worth noting verse 6:
"But our sufficiency is from God, (6) who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." (Emphasis mine.)
It sounds to me like you're trying to combine the 'killing letters' with the 'life-giving Spirit'? The new covenant is not of the letter but of the Spirit. The old covenant IS the letters engraved on stone (stored in the ark of the covenant). Both had glory, one was being brought to an end, the other lasts forever. The law had a beginning and an end.
"This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void. For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise." Gal. 3:17-18
The law 'began' 430 years after Abraham, and that covenant did not annul the promises God made to Abraham. Verse 19:
"Why then the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the offspring should come to whom the promise had been made," (v. 16 clearly identifies the 'offspring' as Christ).
The law was 'added', again showing a beginning point, because of transgressions. Moving on (v.21).
"Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law."
This is the same contrast we see in 2 Cor. 3. The law (letters on stone) could not give life (it's a ministry of death), but the ministry of righteousness does (letter kills, Spirit gives life). Righteousness exists apart from the law.
v. 22-24 "But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith."
The law imprisoned and held captive those who were under it. It acted as a guardian
UNTIL Christ came. It's an ending point, which is why to the Corinthian churches Paul used language like 'being brought to an end'. It started 430 years after Abraham and acted as a guardian (schoolmaster) UNTIL Christ...SO THAT we can be justified by faith in Christ.
v. 25-27 "But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ."
We are no longer under 'a guardian', the law, BECAUSE in Christ we are already sons of God through faith in what HE did. We have put on Christ.
The passage goes on to clarify that we are ONE in Christ and heirs according to promise.
So, by what you've presented, you are saying that the ministry of the Spirit is somehow combined with the ministry of death, that the letter that kills is combined with the Spirit that gives life, that what was being brought to an end is combined with that which lasts,? Would you say that even though Gal. 3 shows a beginning and an end to the law, that the law acted as a guardian imprisoning and holding captive those under it, and that we are no longer under the guardian but have put on Christ, that it was all done so that we could still be under the guardian, ministry of death, ministry of condemnation, and letter that kills, just in Christ? Do you believe that the new covenant is just the old covenant all over again?
I would love to hear your thoughts and how you would address the actual words in the passages above. I used the ESV. I'll get to the Romans 7 passage later. I've got to run for now.
In
CHRIST alone...