Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've been around Calvinism for a long long time and never heard that said.
If you wish to accurately explain, describe, debate what Calvinist believe you should probably look to the doctrines for guidance.
I do not see how it is difficult to communicate in a parable. It is actually rather easy to do. You find something in the real world that matches up with your beliefs. For example: Conditional Salvation can be demonstrated by looking at an alcoholic who desires to become sober by him checking himself into a program to be free of his addiction. In time, the alcoholic who desires strongly to become alcohol free will be sober (over enough proper treatment). The analogy here is that being addicted to alcohol is the sin that they overcome. However, in OSAS, one does not believe that becoming sober (i.e. to stop sinning) is possible in this life.
Why would I need to learn something that I believe to be unbiblical? Every Calvinist has a different view on Calvinism. I am too busy with studying God's Word amongst other things. If you want to tell me what you believe then just tell it to me all of it up front. But most people are not usually straight forward in what they believe. I have nothing to hide in what I believe. Thus, why a person can go to my profile and click on a link to my statement of faith here. Can other folks here say the same?
No one I know has ever said that. what you are doing is reinterpreting what you heard some one say (or thought you heard them say), and running it through your own filter. You don't know what you're talking about.
Okay, so you believe that salvation is based on man choosing to accepting the gospel of their own free will then?
A cursory investigation of reading testimonies of what ex Calvinists believe and what they say Calvinism is about gives me a pretty good idea what is saying at it's core. Oh, and there are different versions of Calvinism. So when I speak of one problem of Calvinism that may not agree with your Calvinism belief, that does not mean another Calvinist does not believe what I have heard them say they believed.
Actually, "pearls to the swine" is in reference to telling an unbeliever about how God has worked in your life or in sharing a deep truth with an atheist. Such a thing is too precious to do so with folk who have no appreciation for God's Word and His goodness. Also, Swines are associated with uncleanness (Which would be sin). Meaning, the swine would be in reference to a sinful person who is an unbeleiver. For the prodigal son had eaten with the pigs during his time of riotous and sinful living (away from the father). So this saying does not apply to believers who are walking uprightly with the Lord.
I am getting the strong impression that a wicked depraved person cannot hear and even accept the gospel without some kind of regeneration first. This lets me know that it is not the gospel that saves them but it is some kind of regeneration first. Am I correct?
