Rule of thumb: stop reading entirely when people talk about "the clear meaning of scripture."
99% of the time they are taking a single writer at face value (usually Paul) and making fudging every other writer to fit that writer's theology.
Why can't we read Paul's theology in the light of Jesus instead of the other way around? Jesus says in Luke 10:25-28 (NRSV) Just then a lawyer stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he said, “what must I do to inherit eternal life? He said to him, “What is written in the law? What do you read there?” He answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.” And he said to him, “You have given the right answer; do this, and you will live.”
If any Christian preacher said this they would immediately called out as a heretic. Some even think the teaching of Jesus can be disregarded completely, because it was "before the gospel was given." The "gospel" was supposedly given only to Paul by private revelation.
I am not necessarily suggesting Paul is a false preacher. Paul's writing the most heavily debated in academia in how to interpret. 2 Peter even admits Paul's letters are difficult to understand. Personally I think the traditional Protestant reading of Paul flies completely in the face of Jesus and the Old Testament as a whole.