• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Let's Talk About Hell

Status
Not open for further replies.

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Noxot, all your points were good. I really do understand the distinction. I was asking if there is a distinction in terminology for what I have seen in the Bible as eternity after our life here for us and eternity for God that you would have as a basis for needing to use different terms.

Sirach 1:2; 18:10
1:2 Who can number the sand of the sea, and the drops of rain, and the days of eternity?
18:10 As a drop of water unto the sea, and a gravelstone in comparison of the sand; so are a thousand years to the days of eternity.

Wisdom 2:22-23
2:22 As for the mysteries of God, they knew them not: neither hoped they for the wages of righteousness, nor discerned a reward for blameless souls.
2:23 For God created man to be immortal, and made him to be an image of his own eternity.

2Pet 3:18 (ABPen)
(3:18) But grow in the favor and knowledge of our Lord and deliverer Jesus Christ! To him be the glory both now and into the day of the eon. Amen. ̀

1Tim 6:12 (ABPen)
(6:12) Struggle the good struggle of the belief! Take hold of the eternal life! in which also you were called, and acknowledged the good acknowledgment offering before many witnesses.

Heb 9:14 (ESV)
(9:14) how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.

can you see differences between the verses? there seems to be.

honestly it seems that the Eternity of God has some how rained down upon creation/existence, as does His Love, His Life, His Holiness, ect. it is true "that there is one God who created and finished all things, and made all things out of nothing. He alone is able to contain the whole, but Himself cannot be contained." and so we use words to describe God but they can not really describe Him.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[ . . . ]This will be my last post concerning alcohol in this thread because it is evident you dismiss the truth that the real Jesus would not have given alcohol to man who was already drunk.[ . . . ]

Good because you apparently are incapable of dealing with the truth, there does not appear to be any truth in you, you continue to make a blatantly false accusation. Until you repent and apologize consider yourself ignored!

Barnes clearly showed that he did not see the guests drunk at the feast when he wrote:

"Well drunk" cannot be shown to mean intoxication... yet you hold to the false interpretation of BAGD and Thayer that "well drunk" means intoxication.

Please show me where Barnes was made the be all, end all authority on the Bible and NT Greek, superior even to BAGD? Even Strong's which you quoted only had the definition "drunk!"

the most wholesome wine—“saluberrimum vinum”—was that which had not been adulterated by “the addition of anything to the ‘must’ or juice.” Pliny expressly says that a good wine was one that was destitute of spirit (lib. iv. c. 13). It should not be assumed, therefore, that the “good wine” was “stronger” than the other: it is rather to be presumed that it was milder. [Milder not adulterated but still alcoholic]

The good wine does not carry the power to intoxicate... meaning that good wine that was preferred, that which was served to the governor, was not alcoholic in content... it did not have the power to intoxicate.

Barnes did NOT say the good wine did not have the power to intoxicate!

Note Barnes said of the the most wholesome wine . . . "had not been adulterated by the addition of anything to the ‘must’ or 'juice.'” "Must" is a step in the process of making alcoholic wine it is never used of plain grape juice!
Definition of MUST : the expressed juice of fruit and especially grapes before and during fermentation; also : the pulp and skins of the crushed grapes​
Lets look at the definition you posted from Strong's again.
G3184 μεθύω methuō meth-oo'-o

From another form of G3178; to drink to intoxication, that is, get drunk: - drink well, make (be) drunk (-en).​
"intoxication" and "get drunk" are joined by a comma! "drink well" is joined to "make (be) drunk(-en)" by a comma. You do NOT have any lexical definition from any source for μεθύω/methuo which does NOT mean intoxicated!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[ . . . ]So we know that the parable of Dives is a parable, the Bible states that Jesus never taught the public without using a parable.

You asked for one other parable that is not directly called a parable, I gave you 18 others.

Jesus was talking to his disciples in Luke 16, see 16:1 and 17:1. I am aware that the Pharisees happened to overhear Jesus in 16:14
the Pharisees also heard all these things: and they derided him.

Luk 16:1 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.

Luk 17:1 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!​
I call the Hell of Eternal Torment Pagan because the idea comes from Pagan Greece, not the Bible.

If "the Hell of Eternal Torment . . .comes from Pagan Greece" as you claim why did Jesus use a pagan concept to teach his disciples in Luke 16:19-31 and never say that it was not factual? You continue to ignore Jewish history which shows that the Jews before, and during, the time of Jesus believed that God had prepared a place of eternal, unending punishment of the unrighteous and they called it Gehenna and Sheol!

Previous post, from the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Jewish view of eternal, unending punishment of the unrighteous. Click Link!

Previous post citing the Talmud, the teaching of Hillel and Shammai in Israel, at the time of Jesus, teaching on eternal punishment. Click Link!


 
Upvote 0

Mikecpking

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2005
2,389
69
60
Telford,Shropshire,England
Visit site
✟25,599.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Jesus was talking to his disciples in Luke 16, see 16:1 and 17:1. I am aware that the Pharisees happened to overhear Jesus in 16:14
the Pharisees also heard all these things: and they derided him.

Luk 16:1 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.

Luk 17:1 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!



If "the Hell of Eternal Torment . . .comes from Pagan Greece" as you claim why did Jesus use a pagan concept to teach his disciples in Luke 16:19-31 and never say that it was not factual? You continue to ignore Jewish history which shows that the Jews before, and during, the time of Jesus believed that God had prepared a place of eternal, unending punishment of the unrighteous and they called it Gehenna and Sheol!

Previous post, from the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Jewish view of eternal, unending punishment of the unrighteous. Click Link!

Previous post citing the Talmud, the teaching of Hillel and Shammai in Israel, at the time of Jesus, teaching on eternal punishment. Click Link!



But you fail to realise the Jews were polluted by pagan Greek thinking by the arrival of Alexander the Great and also the exile in Babylon. And even the Jewish encyclopaedia confirms this.
Jesus was using the popular rabbinical teaching of the day to have a dig at the pharisees in Luke 16.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The parable of the pearl
The parable of the treasure
The parable of the fishing net
The parable of the unforgiving debtor
The parable of the vineyard workers
The parable of the fig tree
The parable of the two sons
The parable of the ten virgins
The parable of the two debtors
The parable of the Good Samaritan
The parable of the good friend at night
The parable of the guests
The parable of the Tower and Waging War
The parable of the Lost Coin
The parable of the Prodigal Son
The parable of the Unjust Steward
The parable of Lazarus and Dives
The parable of the Master and the Servant
The parable of the Pharisee and the Publican

None of the parables are stated in the Bible that they are parables, yet the only one you say is not a parable, because it is not directly stated, is the parable of Lazarus and Dives.
[ . . . ]

How many of these parables are introduced with the words "The kingdom of heaven is like . . . ." or something similar? Is the account of the rich man and Lazarus introduced with any comparative language? FYI the name "Dives" does not occur in scripture? I believe it is Latin for rich.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But you fail to realise the Jews were polluted by pagan Greek thinking by the arrival of Alexander the Great and also the exile in Babylon. And even the Jewish encyclopaedia confirms this.

Please show me evidence where the doctrine of Gehenna as a place of punishment of the unrighteous had any pollution by any pagan Greek thinking? I'm not interested in your unsupported opinion, assumptions/presuppositions.

Jesus was using the popular rabbinical teaching of the day to have a dig at the pharisees in Luke 16.

False since Jesus was not talking to the Pharisees but his own disciples, see 16:1 and 17:1. Please show me from scripture that Jesus was using "popular rabbinical teaching of the day?" Sounds like more irrelevant opinion, assumptions/presuppositions!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
How many of these parables are introduced with the words "The kingdom of heaven is like . . . ." or something similar? Is the account of the rich man and Lazarus introduced with any comparative language? FYI the name "Dives" does not occur in scripture? I believe it is Latin for rich.
Yes, I know his name is not Dives, but he needs a name so I used the name others gave him. I would prefer to call the man "Richard" or "Rich."
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
How many of these parables are introduced with the words "The kingdom of heaven is like . . . ." or something similar? Is the account of the rich man and Lazarus introduced with any comparative language?
“But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’”

I know the feeling.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How many of these parables are introduced with the words "The kingdom of heaven is like . . . ." or something similar? Is the account of the rich man and Lazarus introduced with any comparative language?

“But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’”

I know the feeling.

Do you actually think this addresses my post in some way?
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you actually think this addresses my post in some way?
No

The list of parables I gave was an answer to Fred's question,
Is there another parable from Christ then which is not stated in the Bible that it is a parable?

Apparently, It's a big deal that the Parable of Lazarus and Rich is not specifically called a parable. Fred asked me if there were any other parables that were not actually called parables. I checked and found 18 other parables besides Lazarus and Rich that are not specifically called parables.

The truth is obvious but you, Fred, and Studious are so hard to persuade. That's why I copied that verse, I was feeling the frustration of knowing the truth but being unable to articulate it clearly enough.
 
Upvote 0

CatholicForSure

Active Member
Feb 2, 2011
165
7
USA
✟333.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM

IV. Hell

1033 We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against him, against our neighbor or against ourselves: "He who does not love remains in death. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."610 Our Lord warns us that we shall be separated from him if we fail to meet the serious needs of the poor and the little ones who are his brethren.611 To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God's merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called "hell."

1034 Jesus often speaks of "Gehenna" of "the unquenchable fire" reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost.612 Jesus solemnly proclaims that he "will send his angels, and they will gather . . . all evil doers, and throw them into the furnace of fire,"613 and that he will pronounce the condemnation: "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire!"614

1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, "eternal fire."615 The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.

1036 The affirmations of Sacred Scripture and the teachings of the Church on the subject of hell are a call to the responsibility incumbent upon man to make use of his freedom in view of his eternal destiny. They are at the same time an urgent call to conversion: "Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life, and those who find it are few."616
Since we know neither the day nor the hour, we should follow the advice of the Lord and watch constantly so that, when the single course of our earthly life is completed, we may merit to enter with him into the marriage feast and be numbered among the blessed, and not, like the wicked and slothful servants, be ordered to depart into the eternal fire, into the outer darkness where "men will weep and gnash their teeth."617
1037 God predestines no one to go to hell;618 for this, a willful turning away from God (a mortal sin) is necessary, and persistence in it until the end. In the Eucharistic liturgy and in the daily prayers of her faithful, the Church implores the mercy of God, who does not want "any to perish, but all to come to repentance":619

Father, accept this offering
from your whole family.
Grant us your peace in this life,
save us from final damnation,
and count us among those you have chosen.620



610 1 ⇒ Jn 3:14-15.
611 Cf. ⇒ Mt 25:31-46.
612 Cf. ⇒ Mt 5:22, ⇒ 29; ⇒ 10:28; ⇒ 13:42, ⇒ 50; ⇒ Mk 9:43-48.
613 ⇒ Mt 13:41-42.
614 ⇒ Mt 25:41.
615 Cf. DS 76; 409; 411; 801; 858; 1002; 1351; 1575; Paul VI, CPG # 12.
616 ⇒ Mt 7:13-14.
617 LG 48 # 3; ⇒ Mt 22:13; cf. ⇒ Heb 9:27; ⇒ Mt 25:13, ⇒ 26, ⇒ 30, ⇒ 31 ⇒ 46.
618 Cf. Council of Orange II (529): DS 397; Council of Trent
(1547):1567.
619 ⇒ 2 Pet 3:9.
620 Roman Missal, EP I (Roman Canon) 88.

www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Mr. CatholicForSure,
You are absolutely correct. The Catholic Church teaches the Doctrine of Eternal Torment. Everyone who wants to be in the Catholic Church should believe the Doctrine.

My questions are: Is the Doctrine of Eternal Torment Correct? Can it be proven from the Bible? Should the Catholic Church teach this? Should any Church?

If the doctrine of eternal torment is well established in the bible, then we should believe it. If it is true, then the doctrine has nothing to fear from an honest investigation. I've shown that the doctrine of eternal death has more biblical support. The wages of sin is death, I don't see how Paul could have been more clear. Please clink on the link in my signature for more proof.

I understand that if you question the doctrine of eternal torment you will be at odds with your church, as I am with my church, the baptist church. The question is: Do you believe the church or do you believe Jesus and the Apostles? If you do come to believe this doctrine, please be kind to those who still believe in eternal torment. People fiercely believe this and will question your salvation, your loyalty, anything to bring you back to their position. It's necessary to remain in Christian Love with them. Disagree without being disagreeable.
 
Upvote 0

CatholicForSure

Active Member
Feb 2, 2011
165
7
USA
✟333.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Mr. CatholicForSure,
You are absolutely correct. The Catholic Church teaches the Doctrine of Eternal Torment. Everyone who wants to be in the Catholic Church should believe the Doctrine.

My questions are: Is the Doctrine of Eternal Torment Correct? Can it be proven from the Bible? Should the Catholic Church teach this? Should any Church?

If the doctrine of eternal torment is well established in the bible, then we should believe it. If it is true, then the doctrine has nothing to fear from an honest investigation. I've shown that the doctrine of eternal death has more biblical support. The wages of sin is death, I don't see how Paul could have been more clear. Please clink on the link in my signature for more proof.

I understand that if you question the doctrine of eternal torment you will be at odds with your church, as I am with my church, the baptist church. The question is: Do you believe the church or do you believe Jesus and the Apostles? If you do come to believe this doctrine, please be kind to those who still believe in eternal torment. People fiercely believe this and will question your salvation, your loyalty, anything to bring you back to their position. It's necessary to remain in Christian Love with them. Disagree without being disagreeable.



I do not see the word Torment anywhere in my post.
The eternity of hell is taught by all Christianity, execept for the rare few who embrace the neo-heretical view that denies this truth. I have noted that you offered no verses to back up your fringe POV
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I do not see the word Torment anywhere in my post.

The eternity of hell is taught by all Christianity, execept for the rare few who embrace the neo-heretical view that denies this truth.

I have noted that you offer no verses to back up your fringe POV
Posted by you:
"where they suffer the punishments of hell,"

You have noted that I offer no verses to back up my "fringe" POV? Didn't you note where I offered the verse "The wages of sin is death? Didn't you note that I asked you to check the link for more verses? Here, I will click the link for you:
Here are the scriptures I posted on another thread which refute the doctrine of eternal torment.
Matt 7:13
Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it.

This says destruction, not eternal torment.

Matthew 10:28
Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Body and Soul will be destroyed in hell. Not burned alive forever in hell.

Matthew 13:30
First gather up the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them up,
The greek word that is used is katakausai, which comes from katakaio, and it means to consume by burning, burn down. The tares are gone after they burned. The meaning is the same as in the last 2 verses, that the wicked will be destroyed. As Jesus says in verse 40,
So just as the tares are gathered up and burned with fire, so shall it be at the end of the age.
Just as the tares are destroyed by burning, the wicked people will be destroyed by burning, at the end of the age.

Luke 13:3
I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.
Here, the greek word for perish is apoleisthe, which comes from the word apollumi, and means "to utterly destroy, kill, slay, demolish. Apoleisthe is the future tense form of apollumi which means will be utterly destroyed or will be killed.
What apoleisthe does not mean is "will be tortured alive forever."

Jesus says that the end for the unrighteous will be the same as for those in the days of Noah (Matthew 17:27), "the flood came and destroyed them all" (not tortured).
and it will be the same as for Sodom (verse 29) "destroyed them" (not tortured).

John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

So either a person receives eternal life, or they perish. They die. They are not burned alive forever, they just perish.


John 8:21
Then He said again to them, “I go away, and you will seek Me, and will die in your sin; where I am going, you cannot come."
Jesus said they would die in their sin, not be burned alive forever.

Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Note: Death, not eternal torment.

1 Corinthians 3:17
If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.
Destroy, not torture alive forever.

Galations 6:8
For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption (phthoran), but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.
phthoran: From phtheiro; decay, i.e. Ruin (spontaneous or inflicted, literally or figuratively) -- corruption, destroy, perish.

The one who sows to his own flesh reaps destruction, not eternal living torment.

2 Thessalonians 1:9
These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power,
Destruction, not eternal living torment. The greek word is olethron: destruction.
From a primary ollumi (to destroy; a prolonged form); ruin, i.e. Death, punishment -- destruction.

Hebrews 10:26-27,
For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a terrifying expectation of judgment and THE FURY OF A FIRE WHICH WILL CONSUME THE ADVERSARIES
Here it says the fire consumes the adversaries. They are burned up, not eternally alive and burning, but consumed.

Hebrews 10:39
But we are not of those who shrink back to destruction, but of those who have faith to the preserving of the soul.

James 1:15b
and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.
Death, not eternal torture.

James 4:12a
There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy;
Destroy, not eternally torture.

2 Peter 2:1
But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves.
Destruction, not eternal torment.

2 Peter 3:7-9
But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
8But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. 9The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.

Peter tells what will happent to ungodly men, they will be judged and then destroyed. All ungodly men will perish unless they repent.

1 John 5:12
He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life.
How can those without life be living forever in a lake of fire?

Jude 5
Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the Lord, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

Jude 10
But these men revile the things which they do not understand; and the things which they know by instinct, like unreasoning animals, by these things they are destroyed.
Revelation 2:11b
He who overcomes will not be hurt by the second death.
The living and the dead will be judged on the last day. Those in Christ will not experience the second death. Those not in Christ will experience a second death. This second death is their destruction.

Revelation 17:8
The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss and go to destruction.

Revelation 18:8
For this reason in one day her plagues will come, pestilence and mourning and famine, and she will be burned up with fire; for the Lord God who judges her is strong.
The greek word katakauthesetai comes from katakaio and means utterly burnt up, destroyed, not eternally burned alive. (The greek is future passive indicative tense, therefore it is the word katakauthesetai).

Revelation 20:14-15
Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. 15And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.
John interprets this for us, the lake of fire is the second death. If anyones name is not in the book of life, he experiences the second death. This is exactly what it says, death. It is not eternal living torment.

Revelation 21:8
“But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death
They will undergo the second death, which means they are dead.

(all scriptures are NASB, definitions are Strong's or Liddell-Scott)
________________

Anyway, you can believe what ever you want.
I believe the bible.
Tim
 
Upvote 0

CatholicForSure

Active Member
Feb 2, 2011
165
7
USA
✟333.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I do not see the word Torment anywhere in my post.
The eternity of hell is taught by all Christianity, execept for the rare few who embrace the neo-heretical view that denies this truth. I have noted that you offered no verses to back up your fringe POV

Posted by you:
"where they suffer the punishments of hell,"

You have noted that I offer no verses to back up my "fringe" POV?



⇒ I still do not see the word Torment anywhere in my post.
⇒ Yes, I have noted that you offer no verses to back up your fringe POV. I see many misinterpreted verses, but no correctly interpreted verses to back up your fringe POV
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
⇒ I still do not see the word Torment anywhere in my post.
⇒ Yes, I have noted that you offer no verses to back up your fringe POV. I see many misinterpreted verses, but no correctly interpreted verses to back up your fringe POV

Great! then we agree there is no torment in hell. :clap:
There is eternal life for those in Christ and not for those outside of Christ.
You say there are many misinterpreted verses. I'm sure that you think there are, because you do not understand what I am saying. If you did understand it, you would not think that these verses are misinterpreted. What you are really saying is that you and I disagree. I've also stated that. Stay within the Catholic Tradition. You will certainly not lose out on eternal life just because you believe in the fiery place.

I love your sig line:
Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.

So, will those who do not eat His flesh and drink His blood have eternal life? What do you think? What did Jesus say? Will they have life?
 
Upvote 0

godisreal36

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,645
94
State of ohio, USA
✟2,178.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Praise the Lord friends in Christ. The Gates of Hell will not prevail against me. I love all my brothers and sisters, although at times i don't act like it. A war battles within, The whole Armour of God must be put on to fight the battle that rages within. I'm trying, struggling to put this Armour on, be patient with your weak brother, hes trying.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.