Absolutely. I will be happy to do the corrections. And who better than an authority on Mormonism like you, right?
Wrong. LDS believe that Jesus was God from the beginning. Both Jesus and the Holy Ghost were God before they gained a physical body. We were not speaking of members of the LDS godhead; we were speaking of potential gods, not those who already qualify. And when you say "they" - plural - that actually includes the Holy Ghost? Does Mormonism now teach that he had a physical body?
Partially wrong. Those who would be like God must obey His commandments. That does not directly translate into accepting teachings. Your statement also focuses on the LDS church, but really what the LDS are talking about is God's church as it has been throughout the earthly existence of man. If a potential god (as opposed to "those who would be like God") does not accept the tenets of the LDS church, then it follows that he probably would not necessarily obey His commandments (according to Mormonism), does it not? And it follows that in his failure to obey all the commandments, he would not then qualify to become a god? And yes, I'm focusing on the LDS church here because the whole topic here is becoming gods - which is a belief that is very peculiar to Mormonism and to this conversation, and therefore it is necessary to discuss the steps as required by the tenets of Mormonism. As for "God's church as it has been through out the earthly existence of man," only Mormonism teaches that Mormonism fits that description.
This would fall under "obey His commandments" above. Has the fourth article of faith been rescinded?
This would fall under "obey His commandments" above. At the risk of being redundant, has the fourth article of faith been rescinded?
That is traditionally done at the time of baptism, but I don't recall ever having heard that connected with a requirement for the Celestial kingdom. It certainly helps a person to become more like Him. At the risk of being even more redundant, has the fourth article of faith been rescinded? A person who has never repented, been baptized into the LDS church, and received by the proper priesthood authority the gift of the Holy Ghost could never qualify for a temple recommend, correct? And a person who has never been to the temple would never have the necessary information enabling him/her to pass through the veil, correct? And if that individual's work were done by proxy, the effect would be counted as though it had been done by the person directly, correct? So how can it be said that it be said that these ordinances are not "connected with a requirement for the Celestial kingdom," and without them, how would/could that person ever qualify for the celestial kingdom and become a god?
This is a matter of bearing fruits worthy of God and doing them with a heart filled with love. Pretty basic Bible stuff. Since our goal is to become like our Heavenly Father, wouldn't He serve with honor? Will you please cite any Bible references are made to extending or receiving callings to church members to be nursery leader, Primary teacher or chorister or teacher, or YM/YW president or Mia Maid teacher, or stake clerk, or elders' quorum secretary, or ward librarian, or high priest group leader, or family history center worker, or Relief Society visiting teacher leader? Since it's "basic Bible stuff," it shouldn't be too difficult for you.
Wrong. The LDS perform ordinances for the dead to give them the opportunity to accept them, but they are not requirements of themselves for entrance to the Celestial kingdom. I'm not certain at this moment about the necessity of the ordinance of the Endowment. Really? Elder Russell M. Nelson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles might disagree. He said this about the importance of temples and temple ordinances: “A temple is literally the house of the Lord, reserved for ordinances of eternal significance. Those ordinances include baptisms, marriages, endowments, and sealings. Ordinances of the temple are absolutely crucial. We cannot return to God’s glory without them” (“Prepare for Blessings of the Temple,” Ensign, Mar. 2002, 17–18). And Ezra Taft Benson said this: "When our Heavenly Father placed Adam and Eve on this earth, He did so with the purpose in mind of teaching them how to regain His presence. Our Father promised a Savior to redeem them from their fallen condition. He gave to them the plan of salvation and told them to teach their children faith in Jesus Christ, and repentance. Further, Adam and his posterity were commanded by God to be baptized, to receive the Holy Ghost, and to enter into the order of the Son of God. To enter into the order of the Son of God is the equivalent today of entering into the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood, which is only received in the house of the Lord." (Ensign, Aug. 1985, p. 8) Are you saying that you disagree with these two general authorities?
Wrong. LDS leaders have indicated that no blessing will be denied worthy individuals who were unable to marry during their lifetime. No matter how much our critics want to twist this around, what you suggest is not the case. You are correct that LDS leaders have said this. But what you neglected to mention is that these worthy individuals who were unable to marry during this lifetime absolutely cannot enter the highest degree of the celestial kingdom unless and until they have been sealed by proper priesthood authority to an equally worthy companion. That ordinance can be performed by proxy after the individual's mortality has expired, but it must be performed at some time, period. There will be no unmarried gods, period, according to Mormonism.
This is just repeating of one of the points you made above. Perhaps so. "Enduring to the end" is an oft-repeated mantra in Mormonism.