Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually, in the Bible. Producing seed according to its kind (or likeness) has a deeper meaning than what they outwardly look like
No. Because I told you it has nothing to do with outward appearance but inward “appearance” before The LordCare to elaborate, and provide a method by which we can determine if two different individual animals are the same kind that you are proposing?
Honest scientists (very rare to find an honest one)No. Because I told you it has nothing to do with outward appearance but inward “appearance” before The Lord
In the end, there is only going to be two like/kind groups
He’ll know the difference between the seeds
No. Because I told you it has nothing to do with outward appearance but inward “appearance” before The Lord
In the end, there is only going to be two like/kind groups
He’ll know the difference between the seeds
Does it seem worthless to you?So you claim there are kinds but can give absolutely no way of telling the difference between kinds?
Then the "kind" concept you are presenting seems to be rather worthless.
Yes, kind is worthless as a description of genus . About as useless as a description for natural phenomena as the explanations of people who claim that the earth is in a geocentric planetary system because it’s in the bible or your bible thumping flat earthers who claim that for the same reason.Does it seem worthless to you?
That is okay.
Because there is only One who looks inwardly and knows which kind belong to The Seed
You’re not understandingYes, kind is worthless as a description of genus . About as useless as a description for natural phenomena as the explanations of people who claim that the earth is in a geocentric planetary system because it’s in the bible or your flat earthers who claim that for the same reason.
it’s still an inaccurate description of natural phenomena. Which is why scientists have discarded all of them . Flat earth , separate creation, geocentric orbits. Creationists never seem to get it . IF SCIENTISTS CANT CONFIRM BY EVIDENCE THEN ITS NOT SCIENCE. Period !! They don’t care that any pseudoscience description is in any holy book .You’re not understanding
I added my input with regards to what is truly written in genesis regarding kind and gave the spiritual understanding of what that means
It has nothing to do with what the outside looks like
Does it seem worthless to you?
That is okay.
Because there is only One who looks inwardly and knows which kind belong to The Seed
I don’t know that I care about this:it’s still an inaccurate description of natural phenomena. Which is why scientists have discarded all of them . Flat earth , separate creation, geocentric orbits. Creationists never seem to get it . IF SCIENTISTS CANT CONFIRM BY EVIDENCE THEN ITS NOT SCIENCE. Period !! They don’t care that any pseudoscience description is in any holy book .
Creationists have moved the goalposts on this so much that it’s pointless. First it was, “atoms from a plant cannot be of the same substance as those of a human.” in the 1700s . (yes they started by denying Atomic Theory) This graduated into “the Devil put them fossils there” . Then it was “ micro not macro” . Now it’s using newspeak to change established scientific definitions among other pseudoscience based fabrications. Those of us who don’t accept creationist explanations look at this as some serious denial and/or delusional thinking. Personally I have a hard time taking you people seriously.
Since the ideas from creationism are an inaccurate description of natural phenomena , I simply see them as pointless and useless. Added to a real problem that the pseudoscience descriptions of nature are harmful. Global warming denial affects the whole planet not just some coal miner in Hicktown. Natural selection and common descent have been deliberately used in medical research for almost a century now. Random mutation and a process that mimics Natural selection is used in engineering
You know the story and you consider it “cool”Cool story. You haven't told me anything useful about it. All you've given me is a story, and no reason to believe that it is anything more than fantasy. You haven't clarified what you're talking about, and you haven't given the slightest bit of support. What you've given me seems to have the authority of a fanfiction.
I don’t know that I care about this:
“If the scientist can’t confirm by (physical) evidence then it’s not science?”
All this, measured against the ultimate truth and God as sovereign over all things created means simply that scientists do not have the last say and aren’t the leading expert in creation
God is
And I don’t think the scientist cares about that
To some men it might be subjective and flexiblePart of the problem here is that the "ultimate truth" is highly subjective.
Man can only go back as far as the physical evidence present for him to studyScience does not deal with magic.
Scienctist may or may not care about god(s) but that does not affect their science one way or the other.
Man not acknowledging the sovereignty of God does not change the truth of God’s sovereignty over all things created
Man would like to believe he has everything figured out
Man can only go back as far as the physical evidence present for him to study
He can back into these things
But there comes. Point where he can’t go any further and provides his theories and speculations on the possibilities of what might be true and truth
However, in the end, God is sovereign and has the final day on what is true and truth
Regardless if man did not accept or believe
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?