Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is Boloceroides daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?
Yes.
A kind is a classification of animals created by God in 4004 BC to replenish the earth.Remember, we are talking about Biblical kinds here.
i think that the most close definition of creation kind is at the family level (since many species in the same family can interbreed). and since there are only about 1000 femilies in nature we only need a place to about 2000 creatures. most of them are small.
I'm impressed.No, man doesn't count, those "kind" and "species" things is only for animal.
I'ld say "Poe's Law strikes once again", but you probably figured out also that it was sarcasm and just wanted a little cheap shot in, just... well.... because.I'm impressed.
I seriously didn't know you could figure that out.
No, it wasn't.I'ld say "Poe's Law strikes once again", but you probably figured out also that it was sarcasm and just wanted a little cheap shot in, just... well.... because.
No, it wasn't.
In all my time I've been here, I can't remember when an atheist ever exempted the human race fromLinnaeus'Satan's classification system.
And yes, I realize you were employing sarcasm, but even your sarcasm tells me you could think that up and convey it from our point of view.
And be right at the same time?It really isn't hard to create some satirical creationist position.
So you want to make a special pleading fallacy.of course. this is why i use the words "the most close definition".
A kind is a classification of animals created by God in 4004 BC to replenish the earth.
That classification is known today as "genus".
Blah blah blah, you decide.Blah blah blah, got an answer to my question?
Is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?
Blah blah blah, you decide.
I think I've given you enough information that you can decide for yourself.
If you need it again, here it is:
Kind = Genus
1. God is their common designer.
2. Created to replenish the earth.
When one knows that one is wrong one also usually recognizes a trap when one runs across them.I want to know what YOU have decided.
How ironic, you have in the past given your opinion when it isn't asked for, yet now that it IS asked for you keep silent!
1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.@AV1611VET, I'd like to hear your answer...
1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.
1 Chronicles 26:18 At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.@AV1611VET, is Relicanthus daphneae of the same Kind as Boloceroides mcmurrichi?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?