Ken Ham is debating Bill Nye

[HitchSlap]

And he's coming out with a vengeance!

Is this the cosmic equivalent of my daddy can beat up your daddy?

 

[FredHoyle]

And he's coming out with a vengeance!

Which means Ken Ham he will spout 10 lies in 20 seconds and give Bill Nye 30 seconds to refute them.
Creationist want to believe a creator exists and they don't care how many lies they have to tell to do it.

 

[AV1611VET]

Is this the cosmic equivalent of my daddy can beat up your daddy?

More like: YOU AND WHOSE ARMY?

Revelation 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
Revelation 20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
Revelation 20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

 

[HitchSlap]

More like: YOU AND WHOSE ARMY?

Just me. And reasoned logic.

 

[AV1611VET]

Creationist want to believe a creator exists and they don't care how many lies they have to tell to do it.

Haeckel Schmaeckel

 

[AV1611VET]

And reasoned logic.

Is that why we have a generation of Thalidomide children, 390 graves in L'Aquila, an oil rig at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, and six moons?

 

[HitchSlap]

Is that why we have a generation of Thalidomide children, 390 graves in L'Aquila, an oil rig at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, and six moons?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here? Is English your first language?

 

[Delphiki]

I have no idea what you're trying to say here? Is English your first language?

AV maintains that these things are the fault of science, rather than human error. I suppose he is trying to equate these things in the same sense that people often blame things like the crusades, witch burning, the KKK, genital mutilation, slavery, and misogyny on his religion.

 

[Eight Foot Manchild]

AV maintains that these things are the fault of science, rather than human error. I suppose he is trying to equate these things in the same sense that people often blame things like the crusades, witch burning, the KKK, genital mutilation, slavery, and misogyny on his religion.

And of course, even if he could substantiate his asinine non-argument, it would barely represent an infinitesimal fraction of all scientific endeavors, the benefits of which he reaps every second of every day.

 

[Delphiki]

And of course, even if he could substantiate his asinine non-argument, it would barely represent an infinitesimal fraction of all scientific endeavors, the benefits of which he reaps every second of every day.

You mean to tell me Jesus didn't give us the internet?

 

[EternalDragon]

Which means Ken Ham he will spout 10 lies in 20 seconds and give Bill Nye 30 seconds to refute them.
Creationist want to believe a creator exists and they don't care how many lies they have to tell to do it.

It usually goes the other way around. The person on the side of evolution spouts 10 imaginary scenarios with little evidence or assumed ideas about the evidence and when confronted can't refute the argument.

To you it appears the other way because you give ear service to men instead of God.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It usually goes the other way around. The person on the side of evolution spouts 10 imaginary scenarios with little evidence or assumed ideas about the evidence and when confronted can't refute the argument.

To you it appears the other way because you give ear service to men instead of God.

Prove it. I can prove that creationists like Kent Hovind spew lies left and right. I have not seen any Ken Ham debates yet.

The fact is that you do not understand basic science and try to use your ignorance as a weapon. That does not work.

 

[TLK Valentine]

It usually goes the other way around. The person on the side of evolution spouts 10 imaginary scenarios with little evidence or assumed ideas about the evidence and when confronted can't refute the argument.

To you it appears the other way because you give ear service to men instead of God.

People who claim to speak directly to God have little business accusing others of concocting imaginary scenarios.

 

[EternalDragon]

People who claim to speak directly to God have little business accusing others of concocting imaginary scenarios.

Are you insinuating that I have claimed to have spoken directly to God?
Or are you just meaning like prayer or something?

 

[Eight Foot Manchild]

It usually goes the other way around. The person on the side of evolution spouts 10 imaginary scenarios with little evidence or assumed ideas about the evidence and when confronted can't refute the argument.

I dare you to name a single one.

 

[EternalDragon]

I dare you to name a single one.

So you can try to turn it around and argue for another 50 posts about it?

I've seen quite a few youtube videos with Dawkins discussing things
with Christians and I have seen at least one video posted here even that has asked some serious questions that scientists could not answer.

 

[Black Akuma]

I have seen at least one video posted here even that has asked some serious questions that scientists could not answer.

Can you remember the video, or at least the questions? I'm morbidly curious.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So you can try to turn it around and argue for another 50 posts about it?

I've seen quite a few youtube videos with Dawkins discussing things
with Christians and I have seen at least one video posted here even that has asked some serious questions that scientists could not answer.

It depends upon what you call a "serious question". And you may be correct. The fact that there are serious questions is not an argument against science or even against atheism.

 

[EternalDragon]

It depends upon what you call a "serious question". And you may be correct. The fact that there are serious questions is not an argument against science or even against atheism.

Nor against the Christian God of the bible. You left him out.

 

[AV1611VET]

Ken Ham is debating Bill Nye

Mr. Nye is 449 short of a true Biblical debate.