Joe Biden Wins

[Postvieww]

One hour 40 minutes. I don’t have time to listen to this. Perhaps you could provide a synopsis. If evidence is out there why isn’t it being presented in court?

This is a look at the actual court filing. If you don’t have time I understand but you have evidence in front of you that you don’t have time to watch. Oh well!

 

[Postvieww]

Didn’t you hear Donald Trump yesterday? It’s just needs to be heard “correctly” by better judges. And yes, he was literally “phoning that in”.

Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.

 

[parousia70]

Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.

And the lasted judge in Pennsylvania, being a Trump appointee.
Weird.

Even weirder, Trumps lawyers are telling these judges, under oath (speaking of oaths) things like this:

“No sir, we have no evidence of voter fraud”
And
“This is not a fraud case”

Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud

Giuliani in Public: ‘It’s a Fraud.’ Giuliani in Court: ‘This Is Not a Fraud Case.’

It’s one thing to claim Judges are not accepting the evidence presented, but why do you believe the lawyers representing Trump are claiming to these judges, again, in a court of law, under oath, under penalty of perjury, they have “no evidence of fraud”?

Whats that about?

Why would Trumps own lawyers lie under oath?

 

[Isilwen]

And the lasted judge in Pennsylvania, being a Trump appointee.
Weird.

Even weirder, Trumps lawyers are telling these judges, under oath (speaking of oaths) things like this:

“No sir, we have no evidence of voter fraud”
And
“This is not a fraud case”

Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud

Giuliani in Public: ‘It’s a Fraud.’ Giuliani in Court: ‘This Is Not a Fraud Case.’

It’s one thing to claim Judges are not accepting the evidence presented, but why do you believe the lawyers representing Trump are claiming to these judges, again, in a court of law, under oath, under penalty of perjury, they have “no evidence of fraud”?

Whats that about?

Why would Trumps own lawyers lie under oath?

Trump is just bilking his followers out of their money while he makes it much harder for Biden when he takes office. He knows he lost, he just doesn't want his followers to know he knows.

 

[Archivist]

Didn’t you hear Donald Trump yesterday? It’s just needs to be heard “correctly” by better judges. And yes, he was literally “phoning that in”.

Amazing. And some people want this man to remain as our president.

 

[Archivist]

This is a look at the actual court filing. If you don’t have time I understand but you have evidence in front of you that you don’t have time to watch. Oh well!

No, I don't have evidence in front of me. If there were evidence it would be presented in court.

 

[Online.Gamer.79]

You know I volunteer in nursing homes in my spare time, been doing it since a teen, had a few of those elderly help tutor me. I know alot of vets...and every one I know consider Trump a colossal joke. Of course they also think Biden has dementia and this whole this is to get Kamala Harris into office. But all of this will be decided on Dec 14. Then we will have a winner and all the complaining world will not change it. If Biden is chosen by the electoral college then on Jan 20 at noon if Trump has not left all Biden has to do is tell the secret service to drag him out and handcuff him and throw him in jail for trespassing. Which I think many would enjoy watching. I seriously doubt fraud because Trump flooded the judiciary with republicans. He had the whole thing stacked in his favor. Which means he either lost fairly or the republican politician have had enough and are will to put up with 4 years of Biden...really its probably Harris who will be president in 4 years

 

[Archivist]

Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.

But the judges are doing their jobs. Our president, on the other hand, is not. Very sad.

 

[Postvieww]

And the lasted judge in Pennsylvania, being a Trump appointee.
Weird.

. No more weird than Roberts a Republican appointment flipping.

 

[parousia70]

. No more weird than Roberts a Republican appointment flipping.

Why do you think trumps lawyers are lying under oath, telling these judges “we have no evidence of fraud”?

what is that about?

or do you believe trumps lawyers are telling these judges the truth when they say “no sir we have no evidence of fraud?”

either they are lying under oath or telling the truth.
Which do you say it is?

 

[Postvieww]

A dozen compelling allegations of voting irregularities in 2020 election Let’s hear some well reasoned rational explanations for these issues. I won’t hold my breath.

 

[Postvieww]

Why do you think trumps lawyers are lying under oath, telling these judges “we have no evidence of fraud”?

what is that about?

or do you believe trumps lawyers are telling these judges the truth when they say “no sir we have no evidence of fraud?”

either they are lying under oath or telling the truth.
Which do you say it is?

Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on

 

[parousia70]

Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on

So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?

 

[Postvieww]

So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?

No I was just resounding to you. I haven’t heard them say that. I am sure you can provide a video clip.?

 

[Postvieww]

So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?

So you have no response to those points???

 

[Archivist]

Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on

Except no evidence of this has been presented to the courts. Where is the proof?

 

[Archivist]

A dozen compelling allegations of voting irregularities in 2020 election Let’s hear some well reasoned rational explanations for these issues. I won’t hold my breath.

If these “dozen compelling allegations” are true, why have they not been submitted as evidence?

 

[Archivist]

No I was just resounding to you. I haven’t heard them say that. I am sure you can provide a video clip.?

News reports were provided by parousia in post 523.

 

[Isilwen]

I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on

I am all for that and believe that we have had that. All you have posted is allegations. Allegations that apparently aren't holding up in Court. I think you once mentioned to me about signed affidavits. Don't really care. My ex-wife signed affidavits too and they were lies, which I pointed out and things didn't go her way. Just because they are signed mean nothing if it isn't the truth.

 

[Postvieww]

If these “dozen compelling allegations” are true, why have they not been submitted as evidence?

See you didn’t have time to look at the evidence in the court filing. They have been submitted and not yet ruled on in these cases filed by Sidney Powell. You do not want see evidence you want to close your eyes and repeat over and over again there is none,