No one is “murdering” the unborn, but that is a debate that doesn’t fit into this thread. You do realize that the Roe decision was written by a Republican justice, and approved by every Republican justice then on the court save one. I presume that you also are aware that the GOP was pro-choice until the 1980 election.Here is a ball for you to dodge. Defend the liberal position on the murder of the unborn. Biblical links to your defense would be great but I will not hold my breath. If you even respond your tap dance around this will be amusing.
Yep, I believe I said they would be judged individually and motive is part of that judgment.
Not true. Abortion is the murder of the unborn and in some vial cases it is used to justify murder after birth. At least 60 million so far. I read one stat that said the black population in the US would be double right now were it not for legalized murder Of the unborn.No one is “murdering” the unborn,
That is your opinion but I say it is relevant. Go back and read the opening op on this thread. It leaves the discussion wide open as to why churches did or did not support Biden.?but that is a debate that doesn’t fit into this thread.
So how is that relevant today? All Republicans are not conservatives just as all Democrats are not liberals. Just look at Roberts who has recently been siding with the left.You do realize that the Roe decision was written by a Republican justice, and approved by every Republican justice then on the court save one.
How is that relevant to where one stands today? That fact does not change the murder of the unborn into a righteous cause. Why is it some on this thread which is a representation of the population at large, support either directly or indirectly the murder of the unborn? A large block of Biden voters considered abortion a primary reason they voted for Biden just as the opposite was true for Trump. That fact makes it relevant to this thread. You claim no one is murdering the unborn. Just by using the terms “abortion “ “a woman’s right to choose” “ A woman should control her own body “ or any other phrases or terms used to mask the reality of what actually happens in this process does not alter the fact a life is taken. You as have others attempted to soft peddle this issue by pointing out republicans who have supported it. Some say it is not relevant to them because Republicans have not yet overturned it. The church has not yet brought the message of salvation to every human being does that mean we should give up or condemn those before us did not complete the mission? In the original op post #1 the poster said “I am shocked that there were churches that were for Biden”. I agree 100%. The maneuvers around and excuses for the support of the murder of babies by professing Christians is mind boggling to me. I still challenge anyone to make a biblical case that allows Christians either actively or passively support this evil. So far all the pontificating has been a foolish attempt to justify or just a diversion by praising the liberal give away promises to feed the hungry as such a righteous cause we can just overlook this crime against God and humanity.I presume that you also are aware that the GOP was pro-choice until the 1980 election.
I haven’t been one of those, But now that you’ve pointed out the black population would be double, I can understand why Republicans WOULD support it.You as have others attempted to soft peddle this issue by pointing out republicans who have supported it.
Sigh.Some say it is not relevant to them because Republicans have not yet overturned it.
I still challenge anyone to make a biblical case that allows Christians either actively or passively support this evil. So far all the pontificating has been a foolish attempt to justify or just a diversion by praising the liberal give away promises to feed the hungry as such a righteous cause we can just overlook this crime against God and humanity.
No, murder is a legal term that means the illegal killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Abortion does not meet any he definition.Not true. Abortion is the murder of the unborn and in some vial cases it is used to justify murder after birth. At least 60 million so far. I read one stat that said the black population in the US would be double right now were it not for legalized murder Of the unborn.
That is your opinion but I say it is relevant. Go back and read the opening op on this thread. It leaves the discussion wide open as to why churches did or did not support Biden.?
So how is that relevant today? All Republicans are not conservatives just as all Democrats are not liberals. Just look at Roberts who has recently been siding with the left.
How is that relevant to where one stands today? That fact does not change the murder of the unborn into a righteous cause. Why is it some on this thread which is a representation of the population at large, support either directly or indirectly the murder of the unborn? A large block of Biden voters considered abortion a primary reason they voted for Biden just as the opposite was true for Trump. That fact makes it relevant to this thread. You claim no one is murdering the unborn. Just by using the terms “abortion “ “a woman’s right to choose” “ A woman should control her own body “ or any other phrases or terms used to mask the reality of what actually happens in this process does not alter the fact a life is taken. You as have others attempted to soft peddle this issue by pointing out republicans who have supported it. Some say it is not relevant to them because Republicans have not yet overturned it. The church has not yet brought the message of salvation to every human being does that mean we should give up or condemn those before us did not complete the mission? In the original op post #1 the poster said “I am shocked that there were churches that were for Biden”. I agree 100%. The maneuvers around and excuses for the support of the murder of babies by professing Christians is mind boggling to me. I still challenge anyone to make a biblical case that allows Christians either actively or passively support this evil. So far all the pontificating has been a foolish attempt to justify or just a diversion by praising the liberal give away promises to feed the hungry as such a righteous cause we can just overlook this crime against God and humanity.
. Yes Parousia70 is “wonderful “ at replying with well written posts that usually fall short in scriptural significance.Example: casting liberals as saints because of social programs while casting conservatives as evil selfish capitalists. Showing no discernment when open venomous hate is expressed by MANY liberals in high positions all while painting the conservative groups who support Biblical principles, the rule of law and the US Constitution as the evil ones. I believe there is something in our Bible about calling evil good and good evil. Parousia70 is very well written and obviously well educated but I wouldn’t recommend him as a Spiritual advisor.Parousia70 has provided a wonderful reply to your post that I won’t repeat.
. Yes Parousia70 is “wonderful “ at replying with well written posts that usually fall short in scriptural significance.Example: casting liberals as saints because of social programs while casting conservatives as evil selfish capitalists. Showing no discernment when open venomous hate is expressed by MANY liberals in high positions all while painting the conservative groups who support Biblical principles, the rule of law and the US Constitution as the evil ones. I believe there is something in our Bible about calling evil good and good evil. Parousia70 is very well written and obviously well educated but I wouldn’t recommend him as a Spiritual advisor.
. Showing no discernment when open venomous hate is expressed by MANY liberals in high positions
*except of course those Biblical Principles found in Matthew 25, those principles are apparently exempt from requiring "Support" from Conservative "Groups"... (Remember just a few posts back how you argued AGAINST Groups being responsible for supporting Biblical values?)all while painting the conservative groups who support Biblical principles,
the rule of law and the US Constitution
. Try the one below. Do I need to take you through the Bible and prove the saved are referred to as saints?I don't recall him saying that liberals are "saints." Want to show me those words?
. I actually said he “cast “ them as saints or in others words portrayed or implied they were saints. He has outright called conservatives evil I guess that is tit for tat since I have called many liberals evil.What you call a liberal giveaway, Jesus calls a salvific necessity.
Every time Pelosi or Joe Scarborough open their mouths. Take your pick.If you would provide One or two examples of this I'd be happy provide my discernment of them.
. More twisting and diversion. I was not arguing against “Groups being responsible for supporting Biblical values”, I was arguing against herd salvation and pointing out from Matthew 6 that impure motives nullified any reward for said good deeds. I said individuals would be judged on these things.You imply that since Roe has not YET been overturned, supporting conservatives because of the abortion issue is as bad or worse than supporting those that definitely are honest about their support for mudering babies. On a personal note to help you understand my focus on abortion. Because of pregnancy complications my wife and I fought for the life of my daughter through doctors and prayer and my daughter had to do the same for two of her children. I know for a fact a child in the womb is a human being created by God and any argument to the contrary gets no respect from me. I stood by my new born daughter as her heart stopped and she turned blue before my eyes. I was rushed out of the room and she was revived. You see I take the lives of the unborn and newly born very seriously. Show me the liberal politicians I can support on this issue. I will be waiting for your list. No every Republican does not have perfectly pure motives but some do. I have to believe Roe can be overturned and I am confident supporting liberals rules out any possibility of that. So for me your well worded arguments on this topic ring hollow.*except of course those Biblical Principles found in Matthew 25, those principles are apparently exempt from requiring "Support" from Conservative "Groups"... (Remember just a few posts back how you argued AGAINST Groups being responsible for supporting Biblical values?)
I have to believe Roe can be overturned and I am confident supporting liberals rules out any possibility of that.
Sounds like a ringing endorsement for the right to murder babies to me. A well worded but camouflaged support of murder. You should be ashamed of yourself. Quote me some more scripture on this. Can you fit this into Matthew 25?Both of Which guarantee the Constitutional right to Privacy and Bodily Autonomy, so I'm not sure how you can paint the folks WHO SUPPORT THAT RULE OF LAW and THAT Constitution as simultaneously "unsupportive" of them?
More twisting and diversion. Do you really believe liberals spend their spare time figuring out new ways to uphold the constitution?????? If that is the case you are diluted beyond hope. Go ahead turn this around with a well worded rant and make conservatives the enemies of the constitution. I expect no less from you.It's perfectly fine by me if you don't agree with the U.S. Constitution and rule of Law on this, and are therefore seeking to amend and change them, but it's absolutely disingenuous to claim those who SUPPORT the Constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy and autonomy as "unsupportive" of the Constitution and Rule of Law.
You made the right choice in 2016. Show me a list of how you got burned and I’ll tell you who you have been listening to the last 4 years. No I am not a prophetI voted for a Republican president in 2016 and got burned by said president thinking he would be good for the country. I was wrong and won't be doing that again.
You made the right choice in 2016. Show me a list of how you got burned and I’ll tell you who you have been listening to the last 4 years. No o am not a prophet