Joe Biden Wins

[tulc]

It is fine to disagree but do it with some attempt at why? Again do you really believe JOE BIDEN out performed both Obama and Hillary????

...I didn't know either of them were in the 2020 Presidential election. What I do know is: Joe Biden out performed President Trump. I even have a link for that:
US election results 2020: Joe Biden's defeat of Donald Trump
tulc(likes links)

 

[SilverBear]

Public record open your eyes.

No such records exist. Open YOUR eyes

 

[SilverBear]

That is the claim but how many were real legitimate votes is the question.

All of them. Unless actual evidence can be provided to show they weren't legitimate.

 

[SilverBear]

No mention of the facts presented just the name calling and insults decried by many on this thread. Well I’m convinced you have a clue as to what you are talking about.

explain how the tweet of an unnamed individual constitutes statistical evidence

 

[SilverBear]

I didn’t say he made the best case I said it was his opinion ( read the post) but that is just one of the facts ignored or misrepresented by many on this forum. I have presented many other facts through links that no one as of yet has actually dealt with on the merits. Below is my quote. “ Someone most likely smarter than anyone on this forum who is not deceived by the MSM and TDS offers his opinion. “

i did in post #950....

On page 8 it accuses the Biden campaign of using visa gift cards to buy votes. However the video "evidence" shows a raffle being held after the election and to qualify for a ticket you just had to show that you had voted. Maybe someone with a high IQ can explain how it's possible to bribe someone to vote for a candidate AFTER they have already voted.

but you seem to have ignored that.

 

[Postvieww]

...so that would be "No, I can't post a link to a single court case where any of those listed "facts" have been successfully used as evidence."?
tulc(is just making sure that's what Postvieww was saying)

No postvieww is saying:

Until tulc has read at least a portion of the report and can discuss facts from the report I am not really interested in tulc’s comment on said report.

 

[SilverBear]

Really you need me to be so blunt as to explain that? Send me a private message and I’ll draw you a complete picture.
. Maybe you can explain why most of the facts never are ruled on in court. Most courts so far have not been interested in facts but use maneuvers to avoid doing their jobs. Tell me what you know about the reported shouting by Justice Roberts when they refused to even hear the Texas case.

i know it';s been show to be fake news. the "report claimed Roberts did this shouting to his colleges in chambers at the Supreme Court building...even though none of the justices have been in the building since April...

 

[Postvieww]

...I didn't know either of them were in the 2020 Presidential election. What I do know is: Joe Biden out performed President Trump. I even have a link for that:
US election results 2020: Joe Biden's defeat of Donald Trump
tulc(likes links)

Yes but that is false information!

 

[tulc]

Yes but that is false information!

...do you have a link showing President Obama and Sec. Clinton were running in the 2020 Presidential election? Because so far I'm the only one who's supplied a link in support of what they said.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)

 

[tulc]

No postvieww is saying:

Until tulc has read at least a portion of the report and can discuss facts from the report I am not really interested in tulc’s comment on said report.

so...still no link to a court case where any of it's ever been accepted as evidence? That would seem to indicate there aren't any "facts" in the "report" that need to be discussed.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

DUE TO MULTIPLE RULE VIOLATIONS

MOD HAT OFF​