It's Electricity, not Gravity.

[Doveaman]

Mainstream scientists are surprised again:

"Scientists were surprised to find that the "jellyfish" galaxy ESO 137-001 has been sprouting new stars in its gassy tentacles. "We think it's hard to strip off a molecular cloud that's already forming stars because it should be tightly bound to the galaxy by gravity. Which means either we're wrong, or this gas got stripped off and heated up, but then had to cool again so that it could condense and form stars," Alberts said. "Telling these two scenarios apart is one of the things we want to get at." -- Source

Mainstream scientists really need to keep up with the EU guys.

It's electricity, not gravity.

 

[Smithi]

Pseudoscientific nonsense. There is nobody within the EU cult remotely qualified to understand the relevant science.

 

[tas8831]

Mainstream scientists are surprised again:

"Scientists were surprised to find that the "jellyfish" galaxy ESO 137-001 has been sprouting new stars in its gassy tentacles. "We think it's hard to strip off a molecular cloud that's already forming stars because it should be tightly bound to the galaxy by gravity. Which means either we're wrong, or this gas got stripped off and heated up, but then had to cool again so that it could condense and form stars," Alberts said. "Telling these two scenarios apart is one of the things we want to get at." -- Source

Mainstream scientists really need to keep up with the EU guys.

It's electricity, not gravity.

What is your background such that you are so sure that EU is right and others wrong?

 

[Doveaman]

What is your background such that you are so sure that EU is right and others wrong?

Scientific theories are never sure.

But I do have a background in common sense.

If it doesn't look like gravity or behave like gravity, chances are it's not gravity.

 

[Smithi]

Scientific theories are never sure.

But I do have a background in common sense.

If it doesn't look like gravity or behave like gravity, chances are it's not gravity.

Rubbish. Point to the explanation in a scientific link.

 

[tas8831]

What is your background such that you are so sure that EU is right and others wrong?

Scientific theories are never sure.

But I do have a background in common sense.

If it doesn't look like gravity or behave like gravity, chances are it's not gravity.

So no relevant background at all, just a contrarian with no understanding of the science.

Got it.

 

[sjastro]

Scientific theories are never sure.

But I do have a background in common sense.

If it doesn't look like gravity or behave like gravity, chances are it's not gravity.

For someone who has a background in common sense would you like to explain what gravity looks like with a photograph or sketch?

Even Issac would struggle with this one as he didn't even know what caused gravity.

Thus far I have explained the phenomena of the heavens and of our sea by the force of gravity, but I have not yet assigned a cause to gravity. Indeed, this force arises from some cause that penetrates as far as the centers of the sun and planets without any diminution of its power to act, and that acts not in proportion to the quantity of the surfaces of the particles on which it acts (as mechanical causes are wont to do) but in proportion to the quantity of solidmatter, and whose action is extended everywhere to immense distances, always decreasing as the squares of the distances.