Is there scientific support for Racism in China?

[AV1611VET]

Really? I thought there were a lot of YEC's on here that reject science. But if you say there is only one, that is fine. Maybe he is not serious and is just making like it is a joke.

I've pointed out atheists here who have, in their own way, told science to take a hike.

The biggest area being in the area of cause-and-effect relationships.

They'll use it, if it fits their equations, but not if it fits ours.

 

[Ace777]

I didn't say he was the only who rejects science

You said: "Don't confuse one ill mannered person". When you single people out like that then it is a personal attack.

 

[Hans Blaster]

You said: "Don't confuse one ill mannered person". When you single people out like that then it is a personal attack.

You were quoting one person and painting a whole bunch with his behavior. I just wanted you to know.

 

[AV1611VET]

You were quoting one person and painting a whole bunch with his behavior.

And correctly so.

I use such principles as cause-and-effect and absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Both principles are used by academia, but only insofar as they fit their current calculations.

 

[Ace777]

I use such principles as cause-and-effect

The problem with cause and effect is that far to often we can ONLY examine the effect. We see this with gravity when Newton says it is a pull and Einstein says it is a push. Either way the math still works for making accurate predictions. Musk for example already has 5,000 satellites in orbit and is working toward 12,000. SpaceX can launch more than 50 satellites at once using its reusable Falcon 9 rocket.

So what is the result of all this vast technology? Almost constant scams where they try to trick us into giving them our money. Cable TV cost $12 a month in the beginning. NOW it cost more like $100 a month. To which I say science can take a hike because I do not not need to pay that much money to allow them to pump their propaganda into my house.

Bill Gates and microsoft continues to be the biggest scam in history. They are getting very good at it and Warren Buffet is not to far behind. Even Musk confronts Gates about short selling Tesla. Although Gates biggest scam continues to be his so called philanthropy which is his way to avoid paying taxes on his investments. Not that I blame him for his income tax evasion. As long as he thinks he can get away with it.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What is the point of this thread?

 

[Ace777]

What is the point of this thread?

This is a thread about racism and how science determines what racism is when science denies race. The example of China is used because they are 90% Hans and that would indicate extreme racism when it comes to marriage.

 

[Hans Blaster]

This is a thread about racism and how science determines what racism is when science denies race. The example of China is used because they are 90% Hans and that would indicate extreme racism when it comes to marriage.

Science is not the tool to study racism. That's why this thread is not properly located on the board.

90% Hans is more Hans than you can take. You would not survive the full Blast.

 

[Ace777]

Science is not the tool to study racism.

Science is the tool or method to study everything. Even you can use science to study the Bible. That is different from the approach they teach in Bible college. If you are thinking more along the line of sociology, that is science.

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/matthewclair/files/sociology_of_racism_clairandenis_2015.pdf

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

This is a thread about racism and how science determines what racism is when science denies race. The example of China is used because they are 90% Hans and that would indicate extreme racism when it comes to marriage.

I don't believe that's the purpose of this thread at all, but you do you.

 

[Ace777]

but you do you.

Do you have some evidence for you alternative motives or is this just an opinion?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Do you have some evidence for you alternative motives or is this just an opinion?

I have no alternative motives in this thread.

 

[Ace777]

I have no alternative motives in this thread.

If you think science is not the tool to study racism then what do you suggest? The whole point is the United Nations is calling for a "probe" on racism and the violation of human rights in China. Why do you think their approach is NOT Scientific. If that is the case what can we use other than science and the scientific methoid?

People say you can not use science to study the Bible. That is absurd, of course you can. You can also use science to study racism. According to this study people misuse science to justify racial discrimination.

https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/ideology-racism-misusing-science-justify-racial-discrimination

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

If you think science is not the tool to study racism then what do you suggest? The whole point is the United Nations is calling for a "probe" on racism and the violation of human rights in China. Why do you think their approach is NOT Scientific. If that is the case what can we use other than science and the scientific methoid?

People say you can not use science to study the Bible. That is absurd, of course you can. You can also use science to study racism. According to this study people misuse science to justify racial discrimination.

https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/ideology-racism-misusing-science-justify-racial-discrimination

I think just think this thread is absurd.

 

[Ace777]

I think just think this thread is absurd.

It is not going anywhere but it is not absurd. This looks like serious stuff to me yet you act like it is nothing. If you remember Bill and Hillary Clinton were all over China about their abuse of human rights. It is sad that you think human rights are absurd. Of course if they were YOUR rights than maybe you would be singing another tune. This is why I miss the WW2 vets because they were ready to defend the rights of others.

GENEVA (24 November 2022) – The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) today called on the Peoples’ Republic of China to immediately investigate all allegations of human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), including those of torture, ill-treatment, sexual violence, forced labour, enforced disappearances and deaths in custody.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/11/china-un-committee-elimination-racial-discrimination-calls-probe-xinjiang#:~:text=GENEVA%20(24%20November%202022)%20%E2%80%93,%2C%20ill%2Dtreatment%2C%20sexual%20violence

PRESIDENT CLINTON:
PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHINA

June 29, 1998

 

[Hans Blaster]

It is not going anywhere but it is not absurd.

Many of the things you have posted in this thread are worthy of discussion, just not here. They are not on topic for the sub-forum. because...

This looks like serious stuff to me yet you act like it is nothing. If you remember Bill and Hillary Clinton were all over China about their abuse of human rights. It is sad that you think human rights are absurd. Of course if they were YOUR rights than maybe you would be singing another tune. This is why I miss the WW2 vets because they were ready to defend the rights of others.

This is not science.

GENEVA (24 November 2022) – The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) today called on the Peoples’ Republic of China to immediately investigate all allegations of human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), including those of torture, ill-treatment, sexual violence, forced labour, enforced disappearances and deaths in custody.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/11/china-un-committee-elimination-racial-discrimination-calls-probe-xinjiang#:~:text=GENEVA%20(24%20November%202022)%20%E2%80%93,%2C%20ill%2Dtreatment%2C%20sexual%20violence

This is also not science.

PRESIDENT CLINTON:
PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHINA

June 29, 1998

And that was not science.

 

[AV1611VET]

Is there scientific support for Racism in China?

Here's a now defunct term: "Mongolian idiot."

Judge for yourself.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It is not going anywhere but it is not absurd. This looks like serious stuff to me yet you act like it is nothing. If you remember Bill and Hillary Clinton were all over China about their abuse of human rights. It is sad that you think human rights are absurd. Of course if they were YOUR rights than maybe you would be singing another tune. This is why I miss the WW2 vets because they were ready to defend the rights of others.

GENEVA (24 November 2022) – The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) today called on the Peoples’ Republic of China to immediately investigate all allegations of human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), including those of torture, ill-treatment, sexual violence, forced labour, enforced disappearances and deaths in custody.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/11/china-un-committee-elimination-racial-discrimination-calls-probe-xinjiang#:~:text=GENEVA%20(24%20November%202022)%20%E2%80%93,%2C%20ill%2Dtreatment%2C%20sexual%20violence

PRESIDENT CLINTON:
PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHINA

June 29, 1998

You type so much and yet say so little.

 

[Ace777]

You type so much and yet say so little.

I gave you TWO (2) links. Looks like you did not look at either one of them.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I gave you TWO (2) links. Looks like you did not look at either one of them.

Which have nothing to do with science!
Yes, China is a nasty country with many problems in it, but you're commentary has nothing to do with science. It's a cultural and political issue, not a scientific one.