VictorC
Jesus - that's my final answer
- Mar 25, 2008
- 5,228
- 479
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
You haven't met the burden of proof that rests within your responsibility, and I already responded to your post wherein you showed that you do understand verbal tenses, and how you violated their usage to refer to an entity in the past tense that doesn't exist presently.There is no burden of proof on my part it is on your part to prove. You have stated that is means future and present only. If that is the case then in all applications it must be the same.
Jesus based His claim to divinity on the tense of a verb. That lesson is lost on you, while the Biblical account shows that everyone in attendance had absolutely no difficulty understanding exactly what He meant. Jesus again appealed to the tense of a verb to validate the resurrection, according to Matthew 22:31-33 - and again everyone in attendance understood what Jesus meant.
Here's your argument in a nutshell.
You would claim that since yesterday is Wednesday, it follows that today is Wednesday as well, since you used the present-tense "is" to refer to an event in the past in denial of its expiration.
Yesterday was Wednesday, and your whole premise is a horrible mistake.
Last edited:
Upvote
0