Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My point being that, when I see you willing to give Canada back to its indigenous natives, I'll [briefly] consider how serious you are about Israel giving its promised land back to their space invaders.So "rich" it needs to pay off its 2nd hand TV in installments. Yes.
Your point being?
I would LOVE to see the white man pack up and go home.My point being that, when I see you willing to give Canada back to its indigenous natives, I'll [briefly] consider how serious you are about Israel giving its promised land back to their space invaders.
What white man? here? Canada? or both?I would LOVE to see the white man pack up and go home.
All.What white man? here? Canada? or both?
I'm not sure which ones you're referring to.
Okay ... I watched the first 2 minutes of this.You may reasonably deduce from this video, that I dont buy into the concept of human "races".
I agree--it's not racial, it's strictly political.Your attempts to make this issue with the Abrahamic Covenant (Israel being in her "promised land") a racial thing with the Palestinians [sic] is not cutting it with me, Dan.
No, I would not say that. I would say that there a conflicting opinions about it, conflicting opinions should be expected in anything relating to Theology. The same thing can be said for many things related to science.So you agree there are substantial reasons to
doubt it's authenticity.
in other words you are expressing your opinion and you are not prepared to establish it as being fact.You may have noticed that Jewish scholars are still Jews, And are not converting in droves... or indeed at all.
All the evidence that is presented is micro evolution, which is merely variations within a species - any evolution that leaves a finch still a finch, a bacterium still bacteria, a moth still a moth, doesn’t demonstrate that life forms can undergo the quantum leap in genetic information needed to morph into a new and higher animal.
So the Earth is flat then.Dan, I have now watched your video in its entirety.
I'd like to clarify again that my issues are not race-related at all.
My issues here are with anti-Biblical science: science that does not comport to a literal translation of the Bible.
You can call me "antiscience" or a "science hater" or whatever else you can think of; but to do so, you have to deny my heuristics:
1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own
Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.
When people scoff at my directives, which they would have to do, then I don't really take their accusations against me seriously.
Micro evolution is obviously lateral evolution, and macro evolution is vertical evolution, meaning a lower animal changing into a higher animal.
All the evidence that is presented is micro evolution, which is merely variations within a species - any evolution that leaves a finch still a finch, a bacterium still bacteria, a moth still a moth, doesn’t demonstrate that life forms can undergo the quantum leap in genetic information needed to morph into a new and higher animal.
Yet they extrapolate macro from micro evolution as if it’s proven fact.
No.So the Earth is flat then.
The same can be said about the stories of Genesis. Perhaps you should try to understand how we know that they did not happen.No.
Knowing the difference between literal and poetic is what constitutes Biblical maturity.
Indeed it can -- but Genesis has very little poetry in it -- very little.The same can be said about the stories of Genesis.
I like to think that I do know how you know.Subduction Zone said:Perhaps you should try to understand how we know that they did not happen.
Why put extra importance on poetry? It fits the form of a morality tale.Indeed it can -- but Genesis has very little poetry in it -- very little.
To find poetry, one would have to go outside of the book of Genesis, namely to the five books of poetry, to do so.I like to think that I do know how you know.
Who says DNA/RNA had to come first?:
Origins of life? Discovery could help explain how first organisms emerged on Earth:
.. conclusion:
Do you know that 'there are thought to be approximately 160,000 species of moths' - Moth - Wikipedia - whereas there are fewer than 500 species of living primates - Primate - Wikipedia - and only around 6,400 described extant species of mammals - Mammal - Wikipedia .
The problem is that Tour gets so much wrong, as shown in this video here:I stand by my statement of fact: no abiogenesis experiments or research is even remotely close to making the simplest living cell, and all the research into DNA, then when that was a dead end, the RNA world, and when that failed, RNA precursors, has, or will, produced any living cell, under perfect and controlled laboratory conditions, let alone prebiotic conditions.
Endless and tenuous speculation, exaggeration, and hyperbole is all they have, to keep that research funding money coming in, and fake out the lay public.
Professor of synthetic and organic chemistry, James Tour, exposes the actual facts:
Scientists create simple synthetic cell that grows and divides normally:
.. more work done since then:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?