- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,603
- 52,510
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
It seems to me that the shroud would be a violation of the Second Commandment.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It seems to me that the shroud would be a violation of the Second Commandment.The odds of this First Century Palestinian burial shroud—with the unique features of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection—being that of anyone but Jesus is exceedingly remote.
The Shroud was refuted. The cloth is roughly the same age as its first appearance.The shroud
The odds of this First Century Palestinian burial shroud—with the unique features of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection—being that of anyone but Jesus is exceedingly remote. Inasmuch as the image is not a forgery, and it originated from a real person living at the time of Jesus, crucified in the unique way of Jesus, and producing a burst of intense vacuum ultraviolet radiation from his decomposing body, who else would it be? Given all this, we might reasonably infer that the Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus which contains not only a relic of his crucifixion, but also his resurrection in glory. If so, it shows both the truth of the most significant event in human history as well as the accuracy of the Gospel accounts of it. The 7 Essential Modules - Credible Catholic
Even the Catholic church with their love of "relics" thought that it was likely a fraud when it was first given to them.It seems to me that the shroud would be a violation of the Second Commandment.
Sorry, I thought that you were relying on the Shroud of Turin.So do you consider it proof of God?
Sorry, I thought that you were relying on the Shroud of Turin.
Only if it is worshiped as an idol.It seems to me that the shroud would be a violation of the Second Commandment.
I would not use the word proof to describe it.So do you consider it proof of God?
Is there some point then in your promoting this item as being genuine?I would not use the word proof to describe it.
Why wouldn't the Apostles have carried it around to show others?Only if it is worshiped as an idol.
The shroud depicts Jesus as having a beard, contrary to the Bible.Is there some point then in your promoting this item as being genuine?
My reading, pro and con, makes me very dubious.
There are no successful results.
No one is close to creating DNA, RNA, or a precursor to RNA under prebiotic conditions.
In fact information theory has proven the impossibility of a random assembling of amino acids into a living cell, ever.
Organic chemistry professor James Tour exposes the facts:
Foolishness.
The Law of Biogenesis isn't a law in the conventional scientific sense like laws of motion or electromagnetism.
It's a counter to the outdated concepts that fully formed, complex animals would be generated from unliving matter like burning logs or rotting flesh.
If it could be established as being genuine it would remove the need for anyone to have faith and only a fool would refuse to accept Jesus as savior. It seems it is God's intention to provide substantial encouragement but still require some faith.Is there some point then in your promoting this item as being genuine?
My reading, pro and con, makes me very dubious.
The appearance of life on the earth was scripted, not spontaneous.We don't see spontaneous generation going on...though if life spontaneously does arrive somewhere, I don't know how we'd ever know it.
So you agree there are substantial reasons toIf it could be established as being genuine it would remove the need for anyone to have faith and only a fool would refuse to accept Jesus as savior. It seems it is God's intention to provide substantial encouragement but still require some faith.
You’ve fallen for the outrageous propaganda hook, line and sinker.
When the League of Nations/ United Nations gave that land to Israel there was a slogan that went with it - a land without people, for a people without a land.
That’s backed up by the famous skeptic Mark Twain, who wrote about his visit to that land before Israelis moved there, and described it as a sparsely populated desert land.
Only after Israel moved there and terraformed the desert and invented things like drip irrigation, and made the area habitable, did the Arabs start moving in and tried to claim it as theirs.
The Israelis had no problem letting Arabs move there, but in 1948 as soon as Israel officially became a nation, six surrounding Arab nations attacked them to destroy them, and they ordered the Arabs to leave the area until Israel was wiped out, thus becoming so-called refugees, which the Arabs are still using after decades, for political reasons, as part of the false accusations and propaganda against Israel.
And ignore all the facts that refute my wishful thinking? No thankyou.Think what you want.
Wow. You are very good at twisting half-truths to fit your fantasies.They did assume there was junk DNA as an evolutionary leftover or a viral insertion they named endogenous retro viruses or ERVs, before finally figuring out those segments of DNA are involved in the growth and development of the fetus, and then are deactivated, but don’t let actual facts interfere with your shpiel.
So "rich" it needs to pay off its 2nd hand TV in installments. Yes.That's pretty rich, considering your national anthem starts out: "O Canada! Our home and native land!"
You may have noticed that Jewish scholars are still Jews, And are not converting in droves... or indeed at all.Can you show me the exact wording you are talking about, general answers are not helpful as evidence. I would be shocked that over all these years no one would have raised your objection about the coins, there were Jewish scholars reviewing everything that claimed to support that Jesus was God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?