Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can you show me the exact wording you are talking about, general answers are not helpful as evidence. I would be shocked that over all these years no one would have raised your objection about the coins, there were Jewish scholars reviewing everything that claimed to support that Jesus was God.Jewish holy law
They play games with radiometric dating, to get the age that they want something to be.
C14 is particularly unreliable due to the degradation of the earths magnetic field.
Can you show me the exact wording you are talking about, general answers are not helpful as evidence. I would be shocked that over all these years no one would have raised your objection about the coins, there were Jewish scholars reviewing everything that claimed to support that Jesus was God.
No, it isn't.
Because it's the study of how organic chemistry increases in complexity and about mechanisms for the beginning of replicators.
These are factual avenues of research with measurable results.
Hachimoji DNA:There are no successful results.
No one is close to creating DNA, RNA, or a precursor to RNA under prebiotic conditions.
.. is a synthetic nucleic acid analog that uses four synthetic nucleotides in addition to the four present in the natural nucleic acids, DNA and RNA. This leads to four allowed base pairs: two unnatural base pairs formed by the synthetic nucleobases in addition to the two normal pairs. Hachimoji bases have been demonstrated in both DNA and RNA analogs, using deoxyribose and ribose respectively as the backbone sugar.
Benefits of such a nucleic acid system may include an enhanced ability to store data, as well as insights into what may be possible in the search for extraterrestrial life.
The hachimoji DNA system produced one type of catalytic RNA (ribozyme or aptamer) in vitro.
No one is even remotely close to making functional DNA under any conceivable PREBIOTIC CONDITIONS.
'Division and growth of synthetic vesicles' puts that one to rest.
(Ie: @Ponderous Curmudgeon was right about the false dichotomy).
News article here:
.. and then:
Scientists create simple synthetic cell that grows and divides normally:That’s laughable. Do you not understand that no one is even close to making a living cell under ideal laboratory conditions, let alone prebiotic conditions?
.. more work done since then:Scientists at JCVI constructed the first cell with a synthetic genome in 2010. They didn't build that cell completely from scratch. Instead, they started with cells from a very simple type of bacteria called a mycoplasma. They destroyed the DNA in those cells and replaced it with DNA that was designed on a computer and synthesized in a lab. This was the first organism in the history of life on Earth to have an entirely synthetic genome. They called it JCVI-syn1.0.
Since then, scientists have been working to strip that organism down to its minimum genetic components. The super-simple cell they created five years ago, dubbed JCVI-syn3.0, was perhaps too minimalist. The researchers have now added 19 genes back to this cell, including the seven needed for normal cell division, to create the new variant, JCVI-syn3A. This variant has fewer than 500 genes. To put that number in perspective, the E. coli bacteria that live in your gut have about 4,000 genes. A human cell has around 30,000.
Who says DNA/RNA had to come first?:No one is even remotely close to making functional DNA under any conceivable PREBIOTIC CONDITIONS.
.. conclusion:The widely accepted view among scientists is that RNA, found in all living cells, would have likely represented the first molecules of life, hypothesizing an "RNA-first" view of the origin of living systems from non-living molecules. Blaber's results indicate that the set of amino acids produced by simple chemical processes contains the requisite information to produce complex folded proteins, which supports an opposing "protein-first" view.
Another prevailing view holds that a high-temperature (thermophile) environment, such as deep-ocean thermal vents, may have been the breeding ground for the origin of life.
"Rather than a curious niche that life evolved into, the halophile environment now may take center stage as the likely location for key aspects of abiogenesis," he said. "Likewise, the role of the formation of proteins takes on additional importance in the earliest steps in the beginnings of life on Earth."
It appears that you do not even understand what Pasteur demonstrated with his "Law of Biogenesis". Most creationists do not either. All he proved is that in a limited time modern day bacteria do not form in a solution of sterilized and sealed broth. He did not disprove abiogenesis.Abiogenesis research is spontaneous generation of life, all over again, and is just as bogus.
Are you talking about the video where he was caught lying so badly that he apologized to Nobel laureate Jack Szostak?No one is even remotely close to making functional DNA under any conceivable PREBIOTIC CONDITIONS.
I suggest you watch the video by synthetic organic Professor James Tour.
James Tour:Organic chemistry professor James Tour exposes the facts:
Basically a materials scientist who rejects ID:He is a Professor of Chemistry, Professor of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, and Professor of Computer Science at Rice University in Houston, Texas.
..Tour's work is primarily focused on carbon materials chemistry and nanotechnology.
So I prefer to be free of that ID label. As a modern-day scientist, I do not know how to prove intelligent design using my most sophisticated analytical tools— the canonical tools are, by their own admission, inadequate to answer the intelligent design question. I cannot lay the issue at the doorstep of a benevolent creator or even an impersonal intelligent designer. All I can presently say is that my chemical tools do not permit my assessment of intelligent design.
We need ta see that one!Are you talking about the video where he was caught lying so badly that he apologized to Nobel laureate Jack Szostak?
There is no video of the apology itself, but the fact of it is supported by both sides. His video was rather awful. I will have to see if I can find the video of another chemist who demonstrates how Tour lied.We need ta see that one!
Here is a video where Tour's lies and errors are explained by Dr. Gary Hurd:We need ta see that one!
Amino acids aren't a precursor to RNA?There are no successful results.
No one is close to creating DNA, RNA, or a precursor to RNA under prebiotic conditions.
In fact information theory has proven the impossibility of a random assembling of amino acids into a living cell, ever.
Organic chemistry professor James Tour exposes the facts:
Good one! Thanks for that .. cleared up a few questions I had, too.Here is a video where Tour's lies and errors are explained by Dr. Gary Hurd:
Gary Hurd | Center for Inquiry
The shroud
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?