Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What I find interesting about this, is that you don't see too many single pastors or elders. That could be simply because most people marry but I get the vibe that in most churches they would not want a single pastor. First, they say a single pastor could not relate to all the married couples and families. Second, they say the potential for single women in the church wanting to date the pastor could lead to problems.
However, if we believe Paul then a single pastor should not be an issue. If he feels called to remain single to have more time for the ministry, what's wrong with that? Even if he's not married, he still knows what the Bible says about marriage and can lean on married elders to help out when he needs to deal with a marriage related issue. As for the single pastor dating, it depends on whether he wants to or not. If he feels called to remain single, then it's not an issue. If he doesn't then he will just have to handle it in a mature way.
In my church I've noticed the college and career group is always led by a young couple. I suppose the elders think a young couple can model marriage for these young adults but were single not that long ago that they forgot what it's like. They probably also worry about a single leader dating from within the group. No matter how you look at it though, I see a bias against singles ministering unless it's to children or maybe high school. In many of our churches I suspect Paul would not have been hired to be the pastor!
Something seems off there...
I have often wondered if this is an action un-Christian-like in nature when they avoid such things? Yes, I have noticed that married couples would even lead singles groups, sadly. It's weird. Hypocritical even (if that's the right word?)
Did this kind of thing exist in the old days? Like 1940s?
I think this is why you'll rarely ever seen actual unattached people meeting in churches, and just hitting the online dating apps or just out and about in public. Usually finding those to marry that are matched up when it comes to interests and character as opposed to Christian-likedness.
It is ironic, as I had people tell me "the best place to meet someone is in church"'...now it's simply avoided altogether, even discouraged by the actual church staff.
You could say they are the enablers of single people matching up with people that aren't matched up with them in Christian beliefs.
IF they want people to marry other actual CHRISTIAN behaving singles, they better encourage singles groups. But that's never going to happen.
The church isn't enabling anyone to pursue unbelievers. Those who knowingly date unsaved prospects are willfully sinning and entered the relationship of their own volition.
There are significant reasons why pairing in today's culture is harder than it was before:
Yours in His Service,
- Women entered the workforce and aren't dependent on men for financial sustenance.
- The rising divorce rate made some reluctant to marry.
- Men and women are more selective than before.
- Global connection expanded the dating pool.
- Church attendance is lower.
- Men and women no longer view the church as a source for friendships or companions. They look elsewhere.
~Bella
Ditto on that last bullet point. Agreed on not even a FRIENDSHIP is considered... It's sad that it's that way, as in the "good ol days", church was all about community and actual fellowship. It mostly centered around church functions outside of just the Sunday gathering. Just think of the Norman Rockwell moment. lol
Now, it's mostly families that hit the church for an hour on Sunday, and scurry home, not even mingling afterwards.
People see dating anyone in church as dating a co-worker. A social taboo. So what's a Christian single to do if they aren't meeting singles in church? It's become ironic almost.
So why is it that people prefer to keep their social circles separate? I recall a woman turning me down because we were in the same "circles", but...I wouldn't let that stop me. She said, "Too much drama" and I said, "I'm drama free! lol" It was weird, as I hadn' t been in touch with our friends for a good long while.
It's like people prefer to meet as COMPLETE strangers for the purpose of romantic coupling...with no building of famliarity whatsoever. I mean, do I have to start hitting on women in grocery or bookstores like my parents did? lol
TIM,
I suspect that's a Protestant thing. I was raised in the Catholic church and we didn't spend our free time with church members. I didn't have friends at church save those I knew from school. Nor did my mother and her siblings when they were younger.
My grandparents vetted their connections and created a social club with like-minded parents. They had outings and their children played together. They were never told they had to befriend everyone and nor were we. We excel in communication and making new acquaintances in spite of our upbringing.
Sunday is probably the lone day of rest families have. Most are working during the week and running errands on the weekend. They don't have the luxury of hanging around chit-chatting when chores, homework, and dinner duties await them at home.
I view church as a place of worship. There's nothing wrong with wanting to make friends or marry. But you can obsess over it too. The cultural shift is more likely to affect introverts more than others.
They don't want to deal with the baggage or fallout of failed connections. I kept my social life separate from work and home. They're constants and I didn't want the drama. Endings can be messy and I value my peace of mind.
We're all strangers at some point. You don't know co-workers, schoolmates, etc. That's a part of life. A desire for familiarity is fine but it isn't a necessity for most. The world won't conform to our whims. We adapt or go without.
Yours in His Service,
~Bella
Ditto on that last bullet point. Agreed on not even a FRIENDSHIP is considered... It's sad that it's that way, as in the "good ol days", church was all about community and actual fellowship. It mostly centered around church functions outside of just the Sunday gathering. Just think of the Norman Rockwell moment. lol
Now, it's mostly families that hit the church for an hour on Sunday, and scurry home, not even mingling afterwards.
OTOH, where I live...people who work together have wound up dating and have gotten married.
It seems people are just coming up with reasons NOT to date anyone, it's rather sad.
So I'm like "WEll, you say that NOW...but, you may be whistling a different tune should someone you click with walks into your life. ;-)
Yes, I agree. Indeed, in my opinion (and I believe I am in The Spirit in saying this), the present model of church unity (that’s a contradiction in terms!) and worship services as necessary for spiritual development and fellowship have been absolute disasters. To come to that conclusion all we need to do is review some of the current products.
As a Systems Analyst I went into organisations to evaluate their current systems and recommend and make improvements. Some of that required the application of Business Analysis skills too, assessing whether or not their current systems were helping them achieve their business goals or not.
If I was called into the current church system to rate it for efficiency and productivity, I would give it a poor mark!
We need to return the church to its fellowship roots. Not only will there be a vast improvement to Christian outcomes, but society would benefit too.
I don’t believe that God is impressed by our so-called worship services anywhere near as much as we think He is.
There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind that the advent of church factions and the dependence on a worship service and other formal meetings, as necessary to promote spiritual development and Christlike character within its members, have been dismal failures.
TIM,
You live in a small town. I live in a city with millions of residents. There's no comparison between the two.
Sad to whom?
Being single doesn't entitle anyone to consideration or accommodation for their singleness. You can't force churchgoers to consider someone because they're lonely and want to marry. God doesn't twist our arms.
Yours in His Service,
~Bella
Oftentimes fellowship involves study or another form of learning and most people have enough on their plate. I don't need another class! Connecting with Christians pursuing similar aims has been helpful. We support and encourage one another and feel comfortable sharing openly. Sometimes the right ones aren't in your backyard. That's been my experience.
Yours in His Service,
~Bella
I believe the purpose of the worship service is to corporately worship God and preach the word. While fellowship can and does happen there, that is not the primary focus. Fellowship should mostly happen outside of the worship service.
So I just listened to a guy on YouTube going over a study that said 50% of singles have no desire to marry and even stranger this 50% are not even looking for a date!
dayhiker,
Christian singles are more likely to define themselves by their singleness than unbelievers. They worry more and experience frequent periods of despondency. Singles attach more meaning to marriage and feel a sense of emptiness when the need is unmet.
You're more likely to encounter kid gloving in Christian circles. The elephant in the room is frequently ignored and you won't hear uncomfortable truths that may help you solve the problem. They don't want hurt anyone's feelings.
On the forum I frequented the atmosphere was different. We weren't enablers. If you presented a dilemma we responded accordingly. Sometimes that meant addressing poor behavior or tell the person they're tripping themselves up.
We didn't speak from supposition. We were in relationships or had recent experiences to draw from. That's important. When I see people weighing in with no experience with the opposite sex or who haven't reached first base in years I'm leery.
Yours in His Service,
~Bella
Haven't reached first? What if we haven't left the on deck circle?
I know. I was joking. I do rarely date though. I'm afraid I'm just too used to being alone. I can't come up with many things I want to do with another person. Hours of conversation is not my thing. I think I'd like more of an activity partner or someone to sit and watch movies with. Beyond that I do a lot of quiet things by myself. I would need to meet someone quiet and somewhat independent. Otherwise I don't think we'd click.NUAG,
It is perfectly okay to share your experiences or lack thereof.
But there's a difference between recalling something that happened recently and an event which occurred eight years ago as if it were today. The dating market isn't stagnant and changes over time. What holds true in the past may be no longer relevant.
Yours in His Servant,
~Bella
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?