Is not Voting a sin even if there are not Good Candidates?

[yeshuaslavejeff]

That means if Trump does win, those Christians will have tied the Church to everything he does in office...or even out of office, since they have made the claim that Trumps values are Christian values. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1474449713049-1'); });

TRUMP or anyone else, any party.
Those whose 'kingdom' / system is the world system
have a big problem with SCRIPTURE and YHWH'S KINGDOM.

 

[RDKirk]

Source please.



So what? They are both a pair of crooked degenerates. Would you prefer to be eaten by a lion or a shark?

Here is the problem: People (especially Christians) will admit at one point that they are choosing "the lesser of two evils."

But then, after having chosen an evil they will begin to rationalize in their minds--and then to the world--that their choice was not an evil at all, but was really a good after all...righteous in the sight of God, and therefore something to be pursued in the future. People do this all the time.

No, when we are placed in a position that forces us to choose the lesser of two evils, we must always remember that we chose an evil, and in the future try to make sure we don't fall into that particular position again.

 

[Inkfingers]

No, when we are placed in a position that forces us to choose the lesser of two evils, we must always remember that we chose an evil, and in the future try to make sure we don't fall into that particular position again.

I think this is an important point; whichever one wins, it will be an evil, and people do tend to try to justify their choice afterwards (I know I certainly have done so in the past).

It's strange that people are treating this as if they must choose one or the other, but they don't explain why. We are not really here for damage limitation, are we, no matter how tempting it is for us all to act that way. Damage limitation might actually be the worst thing to do because it prolongues the pain and makes it harder for people to realise the consequences of their actions.

 

[bhsmte]

I love these; "is this a sin threads".

Hilarious!

 

[smaneck]

no assaults by trump, that is a red herring.

News Flash! If you touch a woman in sexual manner without her explicit permission, that is a sexual assault.

but hillary has broken dozens of federal laws and swept it under the carpet.

Au contraire. Congress has spend millions of taxpayer dollars on their crusades of bogus charges against her and in the end came up empty.

but what disturbs me more is where they got the info.

And you are not expressing the same outrage about Trump asking the Russians to hack her emails (which they apparently obliged?"